An athological and axiological attempt at justifying ethical choices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2014.017Keywords
Justification of ethics, ethics, ethical choices, medieval vision of the world, axiology, agathology, hierarchy of values, encounter, Thomas Aquinas, Jacek Filek, Max Scheler, Józef TischnerAbstract
In the author’s view contemporary ethical thought, particularly in the area of professional ethics, is focused on how to formulate an action and how to assess correctness of their implementation, whereas little attention is given to reflection on justification of ethical behaviour.
It seems that contemporary moral philosophers, including business ethicists, are convinced that the reason for being ethical has always been obvious and, therefore, it is not necessary to explain it. According to them the ethicists’ aim is to formulate the most appropriate and optimal ways to implement these recommendations. However, close observation of contemporary world proves that in economic, social and intellectual life, most misunderstandings result from different views on what forms the fundaments.
In the Medieval Ages Europeans’ views on reality and on how to live a good life were unified and alike. We can find descriptions of links between a vision of cosmic order (established by God) and the rules of life in some of the works by Bonaventure and Aquinas. This coherent view of the world was questioned in modern times. As a result, thinking about cosmos and about man went in separate ways. Descriptions of ethical confusion, resulting from such a state of affairs, can be found in the works of John Donne and Blaise Pascal.
In the following part of the article, the author describes modern attempts at finding a new way to justify ethical choices. The main focus is on a presentation of two 20th century concepts, namely, axiological (by Max Scheler) and agathological (by Józef Tischner).References
Arystoteles, O niebie, przeł. P. Siwek, PWN, Warszawa 1980.
Buczyńska-Garewicz H., Scheler a filozofia wartości, w: M. Scheler, Resentyment a moralność, przeł. J. Garewicz, Czytelnik, Warszawa 1997.
Delsol Ch., Przekraczanie, profanowanie, czyli granice jako problem ponowoczesności, przeł. E. Mukoid, w: Pytając o człowieka. Myśl filozoficzna Józefa Tischnera, red. W. Zuziak, Znak, Kraków 2002.
Etyka biznesu w działaniu. Doświadczenia i perspektywy, red. W. Gasparski, J. Dietel, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2001.
Filek J., Filozofia jako etyka. Eseje filozoficzno-etyczne, Znak, Kraków 2001.
Hazard P., Kryzys świadomości europejskiej 1680–1715, przeł. J. Lalewicz i A. Siemek, PIW, Warszawa 1974.
Jackson J., Biznes i moralność, przeł. R. Pucek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1999.
Levinas E., Całość i nieskończoność, przeł. M. Kowalska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1998.
MacIntyre A., Dziedzictwo cnoty. Studium z teorii moralności, przeł. A. Chmielewski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1996.
Mandeville B. de, Bajka o pszczołach, przeł. A. Glinczanka, PWN, Warszawa 1957.
Monteskiusz, O duchu praw, przeł. T. Boy-Żeleński, Zielona Sowa, Warszawa 2003.
Platon, Timajos, w: Platon, Dialogi, t. 2, przeł. W. Witwicki, ANTYK, Kęty 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 440
Number of citations: 0