The Importance of the Idea of “Destroying of the World” in Shaping the Philosophy of Nature of Jan Jonston in His Work A History of the Constancy of Nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2022.015Abstract
In this article, I would like to outline (very selectively) Jan Jonston’s (Johannes Jonstonus) 1603–1675 views on the history of nature and man and briefly present his profile. While reconstructing these philosophical and methodological issues, it is also worth recalling some issues connected with the biography of this scholar and the reception of his works.
Jonston was a naturalist, a physician and a philosopher. Today he is little known and forgotten, and, as a consequence, his philosophy of nature and philosophy of man, his vision of the world, and therefore in a certain sense his Cosmology, have been forgotten and marginalized. His philosophy and methodology of science have also languished in obscurity.
Jonston belonged to Descartes’ generation, however, his views on nature and science were closer to British than continental philosophy and related to ideas formulated by Francis Bacon and later continued by Robert Boyle. Arguably, Jonston’s position was shaped during his studies at universities in Britain. These inspirations from the methodology of the sciences deserve to be the subject of a separate discussion, but due to the limited nature of the work, they will be omitted here.
In his work An History of the Constancy of Nature, Jonston formulates his philosophy of nature. This natural philosophy is shaped in confrontation with the views of the Chiliasts concerning the nature of man and indirectly of nature as a whole. The views of the Chiliasts stemmed from a specific interpretation of the Bible that spoke of the “ageing” of the human world, culture, and consequently of nature. Owing to the fact that the idea of chiliasts encompasses natural and anthropological phenomena, and that, in addition, it has a historical character, Jonston, in his counter-arguments, had to refer both to empirics and to history: biblical and natural. Thus, he participated not only in the creation of modern philosophy of nature, but also modern ‘natural history’ and modern methodology, postulating the mathematization of knowledge about nature.
References
Bacon Francis. 1955. Novum Organum, przeł. Jan Wikarjak. Warszawa: PWN.
Bilikiewicz Tadeusz. 1931. Jan Jonston (1603–1675). Żywot i działalność lekarska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Kasy im. Mianowskiego.
Bilikiewicz Tadeusz. 1933. „Henryk Martini i Jan Jonston. Fragment z dziejów kultury lekarskiej polskiego Leszna”. Archiwum Historji i Filozofji Medycyny oraz Historji Nauk Przyrodniczych 13 (Poznań).
Bircham Peter. 2007. A History of Ornithology. London: Collins.
Brzeziński Tadeusz (red.). 1995. Historia medycyny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL.
Chansigaud Valérie. 2007. The History of Ornithology. London: New Holand.
Czapla Julia. 2016. „Między autorem a drukarzem. Dobór ilustracji Historia naturalis Jana Jonstona”. Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów UJ. Nauki Społeczne 14(3): 9–23.
Descartes. 2001. Zasady filozofii, przeł. Izydora Dąmbska. Kęty: ANTYK.
Dworzaczkowa Jolanta. 2003. Szkoła w Lesznie do 1656 roku. Nauczyciele i programy. Leszno: Leszczyńskie Towarzystwo Kulturalne.
Eliade Mircea. 2007. Kowale i alchemicy, przeł. Andrzej Leder. Warszawa: Aletheia.
Hall Alfred Rupert. 1966. Rewolucja naukowa 1500–1800, przeł. Tadeusz Zembrzuski. Warszawa: PAX.
Jonston Jan. 1644. Idea Universae Medicinae practicae, Libris VIII absoluta. Amsterodami.
Jonston Jan. 1650. Historiae naturalis de avibus libri VI. Francofurti.Jonston Jan. 1960. O stałości natury, przeł. Maria Stokowska. Warszawa: PWN.
Kazibut Radosław. 2015. „Filozoficzna myśl Roberta Boyle’a a stanowisko chrześcijańskiego teizmu naturalistycznego”. Studia Philosophiae Christianae 51(4) 97-121..
Kowzan Jacek. 2010. „Jan Jonston. Między dawną a nową historią naturalną”. W: Człowiek wobec natury – humanizm wobec nauk przyrodniczych red. Jan Sokolski, 129–146. Warszawa: Neriton.
Koyré Aleksander. 1998. Od zamkniętego świata do nieskończonego wszechświata, przeł. Ola i Wojciech Kubińscy. Gdańsk: Biblioteka Filozofii i Historii Filozofii.
Kuczkowski Jan. 1974. „Wkład Jana Jonstona do nauki europejskiej”. W: Jan Jonston (1603–1675) red. Zdzisław Smoluchowski, 55–63. Leszno: Leszczyńskie Towarzystwo Kulturalne.
Linné Carl. 1749. Oeconomia Naturae. Uppsala.
Matuszewski Adam. 2011. „Popularyzacja nauki europejskiej w twórczości Jana Jonstona”. Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki 56(3–4): 57–76.
Myślicki Ignacy. 1922. Jonston i De Spinoza. Varsaviae: Bibliotheca Universitatis Liberea Polonae.
Pietrzak Zbigniew. 2018. „Historia naturalna a wiedza o naturze”. W: Rozum, człowiek, historia, red. Jakub Szczepański 183–202. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Pietrzak Zbigniew. 2019. „John Locke’s Historical Method and Natural Histories in Modern Natural Sciences”. Ruch Filozoficzny 75(4): 61–82.
Smoluchowski Zdzisław (red.). 1974. Jan Jonston 1603–1675. Leszno: Leszczyńskie Towarzystwo Kulturalne.
Stresemann Erwin. 1975. Ornithology. From Aristotle to the Present, przeł. H. J. i C. Epstien. London: Harvard University Press. Oryginalnie: Die Entwicklung der Ornithologie von Aristoteles bis zur Gegenwart, Berlin 1951.
Strużyńska Katarzyna. 2016. „«Curiositas» jako kategoria kultury barokowej (XVII–XVIII wiek)”. Meluzyna: Dawna Literatura i Kultura 1(4): 35–51.
Świderski Bronisław. 1935. Dr Jan Jonston – wybitny uczony dawnego Leszna. Leszno.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zbigniew Pietrzak
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 372
Number of citations: 0