Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Ruch Filozoficzny

Galileo on the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities (II). The Problem of the Ontological Status of Sensations
  • Home
  • /
  • Galileo on the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities (II). The Problem of the Ontological Status of Sensations
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 78 No. 2 (2022) /
  4. Articles

Galileo on the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities (II). The Problem of the Ontological Status of Sensations

Authors

  • Bartosz Żukowski Uniwersytet Łódzki https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1502-8677

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2022.013

Abstract

The article is a continuation of the paper in which a theoretical analysis of Galileo’s principal argument for the distinction between primary and secondary qualities was provided. It focuses on the problem of the ontological status of secondary qualities/sensations. I discuss three main interpretative approaches to the issue, considered in the light of the findings obtained in the first paper. In the first part of the article, I address the mentalist interpretation of Galileo’s secondary qualities. Additionally, I explore the mechanistic rationale behind his account, in virtue of which it may be called ‘the dustbin theory of the sensorium’. In the second part, I examine the arguments for the materialist reading of the secondary qualities and, by contrasting it with the results obtained in the first article, the theoretical problems inherent in it. In the third part of the paper, I discuss the hermeneutical advantages and theoretical disadvantages of interpreting Galileo’s secondary qualities in Aristotelian terms. I conclude the study by indicating the textual basis and historical significance of the interpretative difficulties discussed.

References

Ablondi Fred. 2016. Reading Nature’s Book: Galileo and the Birth of Modern Philosophy. New York: Peter Lang.

Ben-Yami Hanoch. 2015. Descartes’ Philosophical Revolution: A Reassessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burtt Edwin A. 1932. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science. London: Kegan, Trench, Trubner, 2nd rev. ed.

Butts Robert E. 1978. „Some Tactics in Galileo’s Propaganda for the Mathematization of Scientific Experience”. W: New Perspectives on Galileo, red. Robert E. Butts, Joseph C. Pitt, 59–85. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Buyse Filip. 2015. „The Distinction between Primary Properties and Secondary Qualities in Galileo Galilei’s Natural Philosophy”. Cahiers du Séminaire québécois en philosophie modern / Working Papers of the Quebec Seminar in Early Modern Philosophy 1: 20–45.

Descartes René. 2001. Zasady filozofii, przeł. Izydora Dąmbska. Kęty: Antyk.

Drake Stillman. 1967. „Galileo Galilei”. W: The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, red. Paul Edwards, t. 3, 262–267. New York: Macmillan.

Drake Stillman. 1978. Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Fischer Eugen. 2009. „Philosophical Pictures and Secondary Qualities”. Synthese 171(1): 77–110.

Galilei Galileo. 1623. Il Saggiatore. Roma: Giacomo Mascardi.

Galilei Galileo. 1960. The Assayer. W: The Controversy on the Comets of 1618, przeł. Stillman Drake, C. D. O’Malley, 151–336. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Galilei Galileo. 2008. „From The Assayer (1623)”. W: Galileo Galilei, The Essential Galileo, red. i przeł. Maurice A. Finocchiaro, 179–189. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Galilei Galileo. 2009. Waga probiercza, przeł. Agnieszka Maciąg, Tadeusz Sierotowicz. Kraków–Tarnów: Biblos.

Galilei Galileo. 2012. „From The Assayer”, przeł. Mark Davie. W: Galileo Galilei, Selected Writings, przeł. William R. Shea, Mark Davie, 115–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gilbert Neal W. 1963. „Galileo and the School of Padua”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 1(2): 223–231.

Hacker Peter M. S. 1986. „Are Secondary Qualities Relative?”. Mind. New Series 95(378): 180–197.

Heilbron John L. 2010. Galileo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Locke John. 1955. Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, przeł. Bolesław J. Gawecki, t. 1. Kraków: PWN.

LoLordo Antonia. 2011. „Gassendi and the Seventeenth-Century Atomists on Primary and Secondary Qualities”. W: Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, red. Lawrence Nolan, 62–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martinez Julio A. 1974. „Galileo on Primary and Secondary Qualities”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 10(2): 160–169.

Mittelstrass Jürgen. 1967. „Remarks on Nominalistic Roots of Modern Science”. Organon 4: 39–46.

Nolan Lawrence, John Whipple. 2006. „The Dustbin Theory of Mind: A Cartesian Legacy?”. W: Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, red. Daniel Garber, Steven Nadler, t. 3, 33–55. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

O’Toole Frederick J. 1974. „Qualities and Powers in the Corpuscular Philosophy of Robert Boyle”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12(3): 295–315.

Pasnau Robert. 2011. Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Pasnau Robert. 2011. „Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary”. W: Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, red. Lawrence Nolan, 41–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Piccolino Marco, Nicholas J. Wade. 2014. Galileo’s Visions: Piercing the Spheres of the Heavens by Eye and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Randall John H. 1940. „The Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padua”. Journal of the History of Ideas 1(2): 177–206.

Rickless Samuel C. 2018. „Qualities”. W: The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy, red. Dan Kaufmann, 60–86. London: Routledge.

Rotter Krzysztof. 1992. „Fizyka Galileusza a arystotelizm. Przyczynek do roli krytyki w rozwoju wiedzy”. Nowa Krytyka 2: 31–51.

Żukowski Bartosz. 2022. „Galileusz i rozróżnienie między jakościami pierwotnymi a wtórnymi (I). Argument superesencjalistyczny”. Ruch Filozoficzny 78(1): 25–49.

Ruch Filozoficzny

Downloads

  • pdf (Język Polski)

Published

2022-12-14

How to Cite

1.
ŻUKOWSKI, Bartosz. Galileo on the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities (II). The Problem of the Ontological Status of Sensations. Ruch Filozoficzny. Online. 14 December 2022. Vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 33-54. [Accessed 4 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/RF.2022.013.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 78 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Bartosz Żukowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 437
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop