Selected Problems of Assessment in Teaching Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2024.06Słowa kluczowe
teaching of the philosophy, assessment, history of philosophy, systematic philosophy, epistemologyAbstrakt
The present paper discusses selected issues of evaluation in the teaching of philosophy. It deals with the issue under consideration on a general level since we do not differentiate between high school and college study performance assessment. Critical reflection focuses on the proper mode of evaluation in teaching the history of philosophy as and in the disciplines of systematic philosophy. In doing so, the close interrelation between the history of philosophy and its disciplines is considered. Three basic evaluative approaches are distinguished. These vary depending on whether the assessment is of the history of philosophy, logic, or other philosophical disciplines. The question of whether a philosopher or a philosophy teacher not directly involved in discussing philosophical issues is better as an evaluator is also investigated. Furthermore, the paper also articulates the reasons for preferring the first option.
Bibliografia
Benčič Stanislav. 2007. "Affective filter and "feedback" in the teaching process at universities“ („Afektívny filter a "feedback" v procese výučby na vysokých školách“). In Interakcia učiteľa a študenta v procese vysokoškolskej výučby, 30-39, Trnava: Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave
Berka Karel. Mleziva Miroslav. 1962. What is logic? (Co je logika)?. NPL.
Bílá Magdaléna. Kačmárová Alena. Vaňková Ingrida. 2016. „What is behind the compiling of a dictionary for a bilingual user?“ In Evolving nature of the English language : studies in theoretical and applied linguistics. 201-209. Peter Lang.
Brons Lajos L. „What is Real?“, Organon F 30 (2) (2023):182-220
Burjan Vladimír. 1992. „Evaluation and assessment in mathematics teaching, current world trends (Part 1) „ („Evaluácia a hodnotenie vo vyučovaní matematiky, súčasné svetové trendy (1. časť)“). Pokroky matematiky, fyziky a astronomie 37 (3), 166-171.
Cajthaml Martin, „Von Hildebrand's Concept of Value“, Quaestiones Disputatae 10 (1) (2019): 164-191
Carminati Celso J. 2017. „Training and didactic teaching of philosophy“. Comunicazione Filosofica 39: 167-176.
Dupkala Rudolf. 2011. Insights into the history of ethical thinking.( Pohľady do dejín etického myslela). Prešovská Univerzita.
Fernández Darraz Maria C. 2015. "Women's political rights in Chile: The androcentric construction in the discourse of school history manuals". ("Direitos políticos das mulheres no Chile: A construção androcêntrica no discurso de manuais escolares de história"). Argos 32 (62): 35-56.
Gluchman Vasil, „The place of humanity in the ethics of social consequences“, Filozofia 60 (8) (2005): 613-623
Hosťovecký Marián. Zaťková Tímea. 2011. „Supporting the development of digital competences of pupils and teachers“. In ICETA 2011 : 9th IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, 75-78, Óbuda University.
Chabada Michal. „Human Nature and the Norm: A Metaethical View on the Theory of Natural Law according to Thomas Aquinas“, Studia Theologica 24 (1) (2022): 41-59.
Joaquin Jeremiah Joven. Boyles Robert J. M. 2017. "Teaching Syllogistic Logic via a Retooled Venn Diagrammatical Technique". Teaching Philosophy 40 (2): 161-180.
Kohan Walter O. 2009. „Challenges to think about... the teaching of Philosophy“. Cuestiones de Filosofia 11.
Kondrla Peter et al. „Philosophy of Education in Postmetaphysical Thinking“, Journal of Education Culture and Society 13 (2) (2022): 19-30.
Maco Róbert. 2015. „What is the Philosophy?“ („Čo je filozofia?“). In Metafilozofické skúmania, 9-39. KO&KA.
Mikušiak Marek. 2017. „Language and method of metaphilosophy“. („Jazyk a metóda metafilozofie“). Filozofia 72 (4): 312-324.
Mota Vladimir de Oliva. 2009. „O ensino de filosofia“. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação 2 (3): 35-46.
Nemec Rastislav. Blaščíková Andrea. 2021. "Two perspectives on the issue of prudence (prudentia): Thomas Aquinas and William of Ockham". Konštantínove listy 14 (2): 51-60.
Nikolova Nikoleta. „The relationship between learning goas and assessment in secondary school philosophy“, Filosofya – Philosophy 28 (1) (2019): 75-85.
Petrufová Joppová. Michaela „Spinozian consequentialism of ethics of social consequences“, Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8 (1-2) (2018): 41-50.
Petrusek Miloslav, „Stalin's Version of Marxism as Its "Orthodox" Model. History of the AUCP(b) after Seventy-five Years: A Chapter from Historical Sociology“, Historická sociologie 1 (2013): 33-54.
Polačko Jozef. 2019. „Ethics as a subject at university in relation to the challenges of today's post-fact era „ („Etika ako predmet na vysokej škole vo vzťahu k výzvam dnešnej post-faktickej doby“) In Vysokoškolská edukácia pre digitálnu spoločnosť a v informačnej spoločnosti, 49-65. Technická univerzita v Košiciach.
Polačko Jozef. 2020. „The Ethics of Social Networking“. Revue internationale des scienes humaines et naturelles 2020 (1): 107-130.
De Regt Henk W. Koster Edwin. 2021. „The Hows and Whys of Philosophy of Science Teaching: A Comparative Analysis“ European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (4): 1-16.
Sucharek Pavol. 2016. "The total picture. Praise of thought" („Totálny obraz. Chvála myslenia“). Filozofia 71 (6): 487-493.
Suvák Vladislav. 2016. „Socratic Therapeia: Plato's Charmides 153a-158d“. Filozofia 71 (5): 357-368.
Špůr Josef. 2002. Introduction to the systematic philosophy – the epistemology. (Úvod do systematické filosofie – gnoseologie). Plzeň: Aleš Čěněk.
Šuch Juraj. 2022. Selected chapters from didactics of philosophy. Vybrané kapitoly z didaktiky filozofie. Banská Bystrica: Belianum.
Taggart Gabel. Zenor Jen. 2022. „Evaluation as a moral practice: The case of virtue ethics“. Evaluation and Program Planning 94: 102140.
Tkáčová Hedviga et al. 2023. „Individual (Non) Resilience of University Students to Digital Media Manipulation after COVID-19 (Case Study of Slovak Initiatives)“. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 (2).
Torregroza, Enver J. 2007. „Teaching philosophy: the how is that“. Cuestiones de Filosofia 9: 171-180.
Trubavina Iryna et al. 2021. „Content substantiation of the regional advanced training educational program “Kaizen Technology”. SHS Web of Conferences (104).
Vanzo Alberto. 2015. „Introduction to "Teaching Early Modern Philosophy". Metaphilosophy 46 (3): 321-325.
Vargas Ivan D. C. Patarroyo Lizeth X. C. 2018. „Philosophy: a look at emerging trends in teaching and assessment“ „Filosofía: una mirada a las tendencias emergentes en enseñanza y evaluación“. Cultura científica 16: 88-112.
Varghese David. 2002. „Courses on Indian philosophy: An evaluation“. Journal of Dharma 27 (4): 488-503.
Velasco Patrícia del Nero. 2011. „Notes on the Teaching of Philosophy as a Philosophical Problem „ „Notas sobre o Ensino de Filosofia como Problema Filosófico“. Dialogia 13: 27-34.
Zippel Nicola. 2022. „A reflection on the historical and theoretical assumptions of teaching philosophy“. Comunicazione Filosofica 49: 6-20.
Zozuľak Ján. 2021. „Philosophical, anthropological and axiological aspects of Constantine's definition of philosophy“. Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 11 (1-2): 14-22.
Žarnovičanová Ružena. Zaťková Tímea. 2008. "Innovations in the pedagogical-psychological dimension of university teacher training". „Inovácie v pedagogicko-psychologickej dimenzii prípravy vysokoškolských učiteľov“. In Pedagogická spôsobilosť učiteľov vysokých škôl, 150-155. Trenčín: Trenčianska Univerzita Alexandra Dubčeka.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Marián Ambrozy
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 390
Liczba cytowań: 0