The Minamata Convention on Mercury – a new era of regulation and accountability for the global reduction of mercury emissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPOS.2016.025Keywords
Chemical pollution, environmental treaties, régime evaluation, mercury emissionsAbstract
Minamata Convention on mercury is the answer to the threat of global emissions of mercury and its impact on human health and the environment. On 19th January 2013, at the fifth session of the International Negotiating Conference in Geneva (INC5), which comprised representatives of 140 governments belonging to the United Nations, the final version of the Convention aimed at reducing environmental pollution by mercury was determined. Formal acceptance of the Convention took place on October 10th 2013, during the Diplomatic Conference in Minamata, Japan. It was agreed, that mercury is a substance of worldwide interest due to its spread in the atmosphere over long distances, persistence in the environment after the result of human activity, the ability to bioaccumulation in ecosystems and significantly harmful effect on human health and the environment. This newly established, legally binding instrument provides comprehensive solutions to reduce emissions of mercury to the atmosphere, reduce the demand for mercury in products and industrial processes, reduce international trade of mercury, as well as the handling of wastes containing mercury, the use of methods of storage of mercury. It also regulates issues relating to the sites contaminated by this metal and the adoption of guidelines on the use of BAT /BEP in such cases. Existing measures limited to the geographical area of the European Union proved to be insufficient to solve the global mercury problem. The new rules, once implemented, will have a potential impact on the different industrial sectors, such as municipal waste with the largest sources of Hg (batteries) of hazardous dental waste (amalgams), industrial (pesticides, paints), non-ferrous metals. The aim of this article is to emphasize the importance and significance of the Convention which applies a coherent community strategy concerning mercury in the short and long term, which will also allow for further verification of the problem and the effectiveness of the policy.References
AMAP/UNEP, Technical Background Report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme/ UNEP Chemicals Branch, 2008.
Chand D., Jaffe D., Prestbo E. et al., Reactive and particulate mercury in the Asian marine boundary layer, “Atmos. Environ.” 2008 (42).
Cyran M., Effect of environmental exposure to Mercury on the functioning of the human body, “Medycyna Środowiskowa” 2013, No. 3.
ENAP, The Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Sources, Emissions and Transport, Geneva 2008.
European Commission, Questions & Answers on the Mercury Strategy (MEMO/05/03, 31 January 2005).
Fain X., Ferrari C. P., Dommergue A. et al., Mercury in the snow and firn at Summit Station, Central Greenland, an implications for the study of past atmospheric mercury levels, “Atmos. Chem. Phys.” 2008 (8).
Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, Emissions, Releases and Environmental Transport, UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland 2013.
Goyer R.A., Toxic effect of heavy metals, In: Casarett and Donll’s Toxicology, The Basic Science of Poisoning, M.O. Amadur, J. Donll, C.D. Klaassen (eds.), Pergamon Press 1991.
Grandejean P., Landrigan P.J., Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals, “Lancet” 2006 (368).
Guruswamy L.D., Papps I., Storey D.J., The Development and Impact of an EEC Directive: The Control of Discharges of Mercury to the Aquatic Environment, “Journal of Common Market Studies” 1983 (1).
Health sector involvement in the implementation of the Minamata Convention: assessment and prevention of mercury exposure, Report of a meeting Bonn, Germany 4–25 June 2015, World Health Organization 2016.
Houeto P., Sandouk P., Baud F.J., Levillain P., Elemental mercury vapor toxicity: treatment and levels in plasma and urine, “Hum. Exp. Toxicol.” 1994 (13).
Hujoel P. et al., Mercury Exposure from Dental Filling Placement During Pregnancy and Low Birth Weight Risk, “American Journal of Epidemiology” 2005, No. 161.
Kryteria zdrowotne środowiska. Rtęć, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Medycyny Pracy w Łodzi, Warszawa 1983.
Pirrone N., Costa P., Pacyna J.M., Ferrara R., Atmospheric mercury emissions from anthropogenic and natural sources in the Mediterranean region, “Atmospheric Environment” 2001 (35).
Smith J., The Minamata Effect: A new régime for the Global treaty Governance of chemical pollutants, In: International Environmental Law: Contemporary Concerns and Challenges in 2014, V. Sancin, M. Kovič Dine (ed.), Ljubljana 2014.
Study on EU Implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Final Report, Jarvis A. (ed.), U. K. 2015.
Thiomersal and Vaccines: Questions and Answers, World Health Organization 2006.
Use and Release of Mercury in the United States, U.S. EPA, 2002.
Wang Q., Kim D., Dionysiou D.D., Sorial G.A., Timberlake D., Sources and remediation for mercury contamination in aquatic systems – a literature review, “J. Environmental Pollution” 2004 (131).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The journal offers the access to its contents in Open Access system on the principles of non-exclusive licence Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0).Stats
Number of views and downloads: 403
Number of citations: 0