Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Body Composition in Athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/mbs-2013-0033Keywords
digit ratio, 2D, 4D ratio, body composition, athletesAbstract
In the course of previous studies it has been established that finger length ratio (2D:4D) can be used as a marker of prenatal androgens exposition. Its low level is connected with a high prenatal and postnatal testosterone level. 2D:4D ratio proves helpful during the evaluation of athletes' predisposition to practice certain disciplines.
The study included a group of athletes - 72 men and 60 women - aged between 18 and 36. Physiotherapy and dietetics students (140) from the Toruń University Collegium Medicum and tourism and recreation students (63) from the Bydgoszcz University were the control group.
Body height and the length of 2nd and 4th finger of right hand were measured in each subject, as well as body composition with the method of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (SBIA).
The study concerned the dependence between the digit ratio (2D:4D) and a series of selected features and body composition indicators in athletes of both sexes, as well as the comparison of 2D:4D ratio in athletes and less physically active subjects. In studied female athletes a significant correlation was found between finger length ratio 2D:4D and total and active body mass, and BMI. 2D:4D ratio was not significantly lower when compared to the women who were not athletes. Hormone dependent 2D:4D ratio was finitely predictive in male athletes.
References
Voracek M, Loibl LM. Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research, 1998-2008. Psych Report, 2009; 104: 922-956.
Manning JT. The Finger Ratio. Sex, Behaviour and Disease Revealed in the Fingers. Farber & Farber, 2008.
Pokrywka L, Rachon D, Suchecka-Rachon K. The second to fourth digit ration in elite and non-elite female athletes. Am J Hum Biol, 2005; 17 (6): 796-800.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20449]
Voracek M. Special issue preamble: Digit ratio (2D:4D) and individual differences research. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011; 51: 367-370.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.018]
Bescos R, Esteve M, Portia J. Prenatal programming f sporting success: Associations of digit ratio (2D:4D), a putative marker for prenatal androgen action, with word ranking in female fencers. J Sports Sci, 2009; 27: 625-632.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802707029]
Longman D, Stock JT, Wells JCK. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and rowing ergometer performance in males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2001; 144 (3): 337-341.
Manning JT. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length and performance in skiing. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2002; 42 (4): 446-450.
Manning JT, Taylor RP. Second to fourth digit ratio and male in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evol. Hum Behav, 2001; 22 (1): 61-69.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00063-5]
Manning JT. Digit ratio. A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health. Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London, 2002.
Paul SN, Kato BS, Hunkin JL. The big finger: the second to fourth digit ratio is a predictor of sporting ability in women. Br J Sports Med, 2006; 40 (12): 981-983.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.027193]
Peeters MW, Claessens AL. The left hand second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) does not discriminate worldclass female gymnasts from age matched sedentary girls. PloS one, 2012; 7(6): e40270.
Peeters MW, Van Aken K, Claessens AL. The left hand second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) is not related to any physical fitness component in adolescent girls. PloS one, 2013; 8 (4): e59766.
Tester N, Campbell A. Sporting achievement: what is the contribution of digit ratio? J Pers, 2007: 75 (4): 663-677. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00452.x]
Voracek M, Reimer B, Ertl C. Digit ratio (2D:4D), lateral preferences and performance in fencing. Per Motor Skills, 2006; 103: 427-446.
Malinowski A, Bożiłow W. Podstawy Antropometrii. Wyd. Nauk. PWN. Warszawa-Łódź, 1997.
Čabrić M, Krakowiak H, Janczak R. Badania zależności między typem budowy ciała a składem ciała u młodych kobiet. Postępy Rehabilitacji, 2002; 2, 1: 1-5.
Čabrić M, Krakowiak H, Krakowiak A. 2010. Traits of body musculature in students of medicine and physical education. Medical and Biological Sciences, 2010; 24/1: 19-24
Forbes GB. Human Body Composition and Activity. London: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
Pace N, Rathbun EN. Studies on Body Composition. III. The Body Water and Chemically Combined Nitrogen Content in Relation to Fat Content. J Biol Chem, 1945; 158: 685-691.
Čabrić M, Krakowiak H, Sokołowska E, Krakowiak A. The 2D:4D ratio versus features of body composition and body constitution in young women and men. Med Biol Sci, 2012; 26/4: 23-29.
Danborno B, Adebisi SS, Adelaiye AB. Sexual Dimorphism and Relationship betweem Chest, Hip and Waist Circumference with 2D, 4D and 2D:4D in Nigerians. The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology, 2008; 1, 2.
Manning JT, Henzi P, Venkatramana P. Second to fourth digit ratio: ethnic differences and family sitze in English, Indian and South African populations. Ann Hum Biol, 2003; 30, 579-588.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0301446032000112689]
Bennett M, Manning JT, Cook CJ. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in elite players. J Sports Sci, 2010; 28 (13): 1415-1421.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.510143]
Manning JT, Hill MR. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sprinting speed in boys. Am J Hum Biol, 2008: 21: 210-213.
Voracek M, Manning JT, Dressler SG. Repeatability and Error of Digit Ratio (2D:4D). Measurements Made by Expert. Am J Hum Biol, 2007; 19: 142-146. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20581]
Neave N, Laing S, Fink BM. Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Pro Royal Society of London, 2003; Series B 270: 2167-2172.
Putz DA, Gaulin SJC, Sporter RJ. Sex hormones and finger length. What does 2D:4D indicate? Evol Hum Behav, 2004; 25, 182-199. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.005]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 875
Number of citations: 0
