The favorite and the taboo in memories concerning forced resettlement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LL.4.2021.002Keywords
memory narratives, migrations, forced resettlement, UkraineAbstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the favorite (popular) and the taboo (rarely verbalized) themes and motives in memories concerning forced relocation from flood zones resulting from the construction of hydroelectric power plants in Ukraine. Common topics include the idealization of the forsaken place, stories about helping one another, the emphasis on the loss of home, land, community, graves and cemeteries, as well as descriptions of meetings of migrants from the same. Unpopular topics concern the resettlement achievements as well as the migrants’ priorities and new opportunities. The topic selection is influenced by the chosen strategy of self-presentation, the narrator’s personal experience, and current moods in society as well as in the local community. The assessment of resettlement also depends on the respondents age. That event appears to have been the most difficult for people who were middle-aged and older at the time, who were actually forced to demolish their houses and build new ones in a new place, and become accustomed to new conditions. In the stories of people who were children during the resettlement, the emphasis is somewhat shifted towards stories about meetings former villagers, reflections on the meaning of erecting hydroelectric power plants and the ensuing ecological aftermath. The material analyzed in the article constitutes oral recollections of forced migration, recorded during 2012–2019 in places of mass resettlement from flooded villages.
References
Godyń, M. (2015). Opowieść o utraconej wsi Maniowy. Studium z antropologii pamięci. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.
Hajduk-Nijakowska, J. (2020). Badanie opowieści wspomnieniowych o tragedii żydowskiej w czasie ІІ wojny światowej. Literatura Ludowa, 64(2), 35-49.
Halicka, B. (2015). Polski Dziki Zachód. Przymusowe migracje і kulturowe oswajanie Nadodrza 1945–1948. Kraków: Universitas.
Horbniak, T. (2004). Bakota. Zatoplena dolia. Khmelnyckyj: Podillia.
Horbniak, T. (2018). Stezhkamy Bakoty. Kam'janec-Podilskyj: Aksioma.
Horbniak, T. (2020). Abetka bakotianyna. Kam'janec-Podilskyj: Aksioma.
Horbovyj, O. (2015). Problema Dniprovykh poroghiv ta Dniproghes (1927–1932): Stratehija adaptaciji. Naukovi zapysky z ukrajinskoji istoriji, 37, 95-102.
Horbovyj, O. (2016). Problema Dniprovykh poroghiv ta Dniproghes (1920–1970-ti rr.): Strateghija transformaciji. Ghileja, 107, 54-57.
Horbovyj, O. (2020). Kompleksna transformacija ukrajinskoho Prydniprov'ja u konteksti hidroenerhetychnogho osvojennia Dnipra (kin. XIX st. – 1980-ti rr.) [avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata istoricheskikh nauk]. Perejaslav.
Huk, B. (red.) (1997). Propam'jatna knyha 1947. Varshava: Tyrsa.
Ivashchenko, V. (2017). Stvorennia muzeju zatoplenykh sil Kanivskoho vodoskhovyshcha [internet-stranica „Staryj Dnipro”]. Rezhym dostupa: http://olddnieper.org.ua/news/item/95-stvorennia-muzeiu-zatoplenykh-sil-pereiaslavshchyny
Koval-Fuchylo, I. (2016). Koncept domu v opovidшakh pro prymusove pereselennшa. W: B. Halczak (red.) Łemkowie, Bojkowie, Rusini: Historia, współczesność, kultura materialna i duchowa. T. 6: 147–158. Słupsk-Warszawa: Tyrsa.
Koval-Fuchylo, I. (2018). Pam'jat pro Holokost u spohadakh ukrajinciv-pereselenciv operaciji «Visla». Slov'janskyj svit, 17, 92-102.
Koval-Fuchylo, I. (2020a). Pam'jat pro zatoplennja: tvorchist Dovzhenka i usni naratyvy. Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 156(6), 1445-1453. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2020.06.1445
Koval-Fuchylo, I. (2020b). Utrachennoje mesto v vospomynanijah o prinuditelnom pereselenii i v socialnyh praktikah. Folklorystyka. chasopys Udruzhenja folklorysta Srbiјe, 5(1), 73-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.18485/folk.2020.5.1.3
Koval-Fuchylo, I. (red.) (2012). Holosinnia. Kyjiv: IMFE NAN Ukrajiny.
Kuzmenko-Lisovenko, K. (2018). Zatoplena Prydniprovska cyvilizacija. Istorija. Ludski doli. Kyjiv: «Interkontynental-Ukrajina».
Lesyk, M. (2007). Cybli – moje ridne selo na Perejaslavshсhyni (Spohady). Perejaslav-Khmelnyckyj: SKD.
Mykhniak, M. (2020). Buly nad Dniprom Trakhtemyriv i Monastyrok. Dokumenty, spohady, svitlyny. Kyjiv: Ukrajinskyj priorytet.
Mykhniak, M. (red.) (2018). Zatoplenyj raj: Andrushi u spohadakh ta dokumentakh. Kyjiv: Ukrajinskyj priorytet.
Mykhniak, M., Zuber, S. (2019). Nam Pidsinne teper tilky snytsia. Selo u spoghadakh ta dokumentakh. Kyjiv: Ukrajinskyj priorytet.
Prymaka-Oniszk, A. (2017). Bieżeństwo 1915. Zapomniani uchodźcy. Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne.
Shevchuk, T. (2009). „Dyke pole” istoriji i „chyste pole” folkloru: Ukrajinski dumy v istorychnomu ta mifolohichnomu vymirakh. Materialy do ukrajinsjkoji etnologhiji, 8, 206-211.
Sorokova, S. (2015). Ne letiat lastivky u Zarubynci: Istoryko-krajeznavchyj narys. Perejaslav-Khmelnyckyj: FOP Lukashevych O. M.
Wylegała, A. (2014) Przesiedlenia a pamięć. Studium (nie)pamięci społecznej na przykładzie ukraińskiej Galicji і polskich “Ziem Odzyskanych”. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.
Downloads
The publisher's shop:
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. The authors give the publisher (Polish Ethnological Society) non-exclusive license to use the work in the following fields:a) recording of a Work / subject of a related copyright;
b) reproduction (multiplication) Work / subject of a related copyright in print and digital technique (ebook, audiobook);
c) marketing of units of reproduced Work / subject of a related copyright;
d) introduction of Work / object of related copyright to computer memory;
e) dissemination of the work in an electronic version in the formula of open access under the Creative Commons license (CC BY - ND 3.0).
2. The authors give the publisher the license free of charge.
3. The use of the work by publisher in the above mentioned aspects is not limited in time, quantitatively nor territorially.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 784
Number of citations: 0