A bibliographic analysis of postgraduate theses using the health belief model in the field of midwifery in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21784/IwP.2025.019Keywords
health belief model, midwifery, postgraduate, thesisAbstract
Introduction. Midwifery is a universal healthcare discipline that holistically addresses the physiological, psychological, and social needs of women and their families. The Health Belief Model (HBM) is the oldest and most frequently used theoretical model used to explain the factors that shape individuals’ health behaviours, their search for medical care, and symptom management.
Objective. The objective of this study is to examine postgraduate theses in the field of midwifery in Turkey that use the Health Belief Model (HBM) through bibliometric analysis.
Material and Method. This research was conducted retrospectively and descriptively. In order to access theses, the Higher Education Institution National Thesis Centre search engine was searched using the keywords ‘Health Belief Model’ and ‘midwifery’ in both Turkish and English. As a result of the scans conducted, seven postgraduate thesis studies utilising the Health Belief Model in the field of midwifery, which are accessible and meet the inclusion criteria, were examined within the scope of the research up to the year 2026. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS 26 software, and descriptive statistical methods were employed in their evaluation.
Findings. The vast majority of theses were master’s theses (86.7%), while doctoral theses accounted for 13.3%. The studies were conducted between 2017 and 2026, with the highest number of theses completed in 2019. A significant portion of the theses were conducted at Istanbul University and Manisa Celal Bayar University. When examining the research designs, it was observed that the majority of the studies were descriptive in nature, although semi-experimental and experimental studies also played an important role. While the sample groups consisted mainly of healthy women, it was determined that the majority of the studies focused on early diagnosis and screening.
Conclusion. The model was used effectively in all theses examined within the scope of the research, yielding positive results. In recent years, studies using the Health Belief Model in the field of midwifery have been increasing; however, there is still a need for experimental, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, particularly at the doctoral level.
References
1. Özkan H., Çakıl M., Kanbur A. Prenatal midwifery care with theories. YOBU Journal of Health Sciences Faculty. 2023;4(3):359–371.
2. Yılmaz A.N., Altıparmak S. Menstrual health management in women and the educational role of midwives. In: Health & Science 2025: Midwifery-III. 2025;47.
3. Okuyan Y.Ç., Oran N.T., Can H.Ö. Theses based on theory and models conducted in midwifery practice areas. Life Sciences. 2019;14(1):20–29.
4. Eri T.S., Berg M., Dahl B., et al. Models for midwifery care: A mapping review. European Journal of Midwifery. 2020;4:30.
5. Gözüm S., Çapık C. A guide for improving health behaviors: the health belief model. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal. 2014;7(3):230–237.
6. Fang L., Zhang Q., Zhou N., et al. Influencing factors and mechanisms promoting proactive health behavior intention: an integration of the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Public Health. 2025;13:1629046.
7. Green E.C., Murphy E.M., Gryboski K. The health belief model. In: The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology. Wiley; 2020:211–214.
8. Alyafei A., Easton-Carr R. The health belief model of behavior change. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island 2024.
9. Say C. The role and responsibilities of midwives in protecting and strengthening women’s health in special groups. Istanbul Esenyurt University Journal of Health Sciences. 2025;3(3):1–4.
10. Alpay S., Şahin E. Use of motivational interviewing technique in graduate theses in obstetrics and gynecology nursing and midwifery in Türkiye. Journal of Women’s Health Nursing. 2024;10(2):104–118.
11. Kahwa E., Dodd A., Conklin J.L., et al. A bibliometric analysis of nursing and midwifery research in the Caribbean. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2022;54(2):226–233.
12. Akan D.D. Examination of doctoral theses based on the health belief model in the field of nursing in Türkiye: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Health Academicians. 2023;10(2):183–189.
13. Öztürk T., Emek F.K. Bibliometric analysis of the use of Watson’s Human Caring Model in graduate theses: An example from the field of women’s health and obstetrics nursing in Türkiye. Gevher Nesibe Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2025;10(3):238–246.
14. Motamedi N., Sheikhshoaei F., Ghazimirsaeid J., et al. Bibliometric analysis and topic modeling of information systems in maternal health publications. International Journal of Information Science & Management. 2023;21(2).
15. Richa F.T., Argaheni N.B., Mufidah A. Workload of midwives: A bibliometric analysis. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research. 2024;8(2):30–41.
16. Aksoy Y.E., Ataş A.N., Yılmaz S. Content analysis of graduate theses conducted in the field of midwifery. Journal of Higher Education and Science. 2022;12(2):285–293.
17. Özbek H., Ertekin Pınar Ş. The importance of doctoral education in the midwifery profession. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences. 2020;5(1).
18. Akyıldız D., Karaçam Z. Features of graduate thesis conducted in midwifery area in Turkey: A descriptive study. Black Sea Journal of Health Science. 2020;3(3):73–81.
19. Serhatlıoğlu S.G., Dolgun G. The overview of postgraduate thesis within the department of midwifery site (2004–2017) in Turkey. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine. 2019;2(2):44–48.
20. Dilcen H.Y., Kantek F. Bibliometric analysis of master’s theses in the field of midwifery. Gumushane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;9(4):357–364.
21. Yücel U., Ekşioğlu A., Demirelöz M., et al. Examination of the graduate education profile in midwifery in Türkiye. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2013;10(1):1342–1354.
22. Nelson J.P., Sacks J.L. Faculty advisement on theses and dissertations: Tips for organizing the process. Nurse Educator. 2007;32(5):195–196.
23. Aygün O., Gökdemir Ö., Bulut Ü., et al. Evaluation of women’s beliefs about pap smear screening using the health belief model scale. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. 2020;83(4):421–426.
24. Erbil N., Bölükbaş N. Beliefs, attitudes, and behavior of Turkish women about breast cancer and breast self-examination according to a Turkish version of the Champion Health Belief Model Scale. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2012;13(11):5823–5828.
25. Gözüm S., Karayurt Ö., Aydın İ. Results of the Turkish adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale in breast cancer screening. Journal of Nursing Research and Development. 2004;6(1):71–85.
26. Avcı İ.A., Yıldırım O.O. Health belief scale for urinary incontinence and kegel exercise: A reliability and validity study. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing. 2023;50(5):406–412.
27. Çelik B.Y., Gölbaşı Z. Development and the validity and reliability study of the birth health belief scale. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2023;13(4):823–828.
28. Kaçar S.F., Kolaç N. A scale development study: health belief scale for protection from urinary tract infection according to the health belief model. Fenerbahce University Journal of Health Sciences. 2024;4(2):293–304.
29. Ghaffari M., Esfahani S.N., Rakhshanderou S., Koukamari P.H. Evaluation of health belief model-based intervention on breast cancer screening behaviors among health volunteers. Journal of Cancer Education. 2019;34(5):904–912.
30. Karaçam Z., Eroğlu K. Nursing and midwifery: similarities and differences in duties, authorities and responsibilities. Mersin University Medical Faculty Lokman Hekim Journal of History of Medicine and Folk Medicine. 2019;9(2):211–227.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 37
Number of citations: 0