Klasyczne podejścia do interpretacji praktyk poznawczych podmiotu w polityce: od czasów antycznych do średniowiecza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2014.002Keywords
knowledge, political entity, the state, freedom, bigotry, proces poznawczy, podmiot polityczny, państwo, wolność, fanatyzmAbstract
The importance of research on theoretical understanding of the problem of cognitive practices in political science and traditional explanations of cognitive practices as a basic mechanism for explaining policy are presented in the article. The ways cognition was understood by thinkers
in antiquity and the Middle Ages are explained. The article also presents the understanding of political institutions and processes and the place of a person as the primary subject of knowledge.
References
Aristotel, Polityka / Aristotel ;[per. z davn'ohrets. ta peredm. O. Kyslyuka], Kyiv, 2000, s. 239.
Berdyaev N. A., O fanatyzme, ortodoksyy y ystyne, http://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/fanatizm.html
Zhyl'son Э., Fylosof y teolohyya, http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000169/
Mykhaylov F. T., Zahadka chelovecheskoho Ya., http://lib.sibnet.ru/book/2776
Novyy Zavit, Kyiv: Ukrayins'ke Bibliyne Tovarystvo 2003, s. 318.
Platon, Derzhava / Platon, [per. D. Koval'], Kyiv: Osnovy 2000., s. 355.
Toma Akvins'kyy, Komentari do Aristotelevoyi «Polityky» / Toma Akvins'kyy ; [per. z latyny O. Kyslyuka], Kyiv: Osnovy 2003, s. 795.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Nicolaus Copernicus University fully respects the right to privacy and protection of personal data of all authors. The authors’ personal data is not used for commercial and/or marketing purposes.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 461
Number of citations: 0