Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do stopki
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Strona domowa
  • Aktualny numer
  • Archiwum
  • Ogłoszenia
  • O czasopiśmie
    • O czasopiśmie
    • Przesyłanie tekstów
    • Proces recenzji
    • Zespół redakcyjny
    • Rada Naukowa
    • Redaktorzy tematyczni
    • Zespół Recenzentów (2024-2025)
    • Standardy etyczne
    • Opłaty
    • Indeksowanie
    • Polityka prywatności
    • Kontakt
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Historia i Polityka

Polarization in the U.S.: Trump’s First-Term Policies and Democratic Responses: Lessons for a Trump 2.0 Era
  • Strona domowa
  • /
  • Polarization in the U.S.: Trump’s First-Term Policies and Democratic Responses: Lessons for a Trump 2.0 Era
  1. Strona domowa /
  2. Archiwum /
  3. Nr 56 (63) (2026) /
  4. Papers

Polarization in the U.S.: Trump’s First-Term Policies and Democratic Responses: Lessons for a Trump 2.0 Era

Autor

  • Andrzej Demczuk Maria Curie Skłodowska University, Institute of International Relations https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-1212

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2026.011

Słowa kluczowe

polarization, the U.S., democracy, Donald Trump, Democratic Party

Abstrakt

The main goal of this study is to examine President Trump’s first-term policies and Democratic responses to them, to assess whether polarization in the U.S. was driven more by one party or whether both parties contributed to the escalation. To do so, the author is going to apply Jennifer McCoy and Murat Somer’s theory of pernicious polarization which argues that democracy can be most threatened when political leaders intensify divisions instead of constructively resolving underlying grievances. The theory focuses on what actions opposing political actors take, in this case, Democrats. Do they also employ divisive tactics or not? This analysis serves as a basis for evaluating how Republicans and Democrats might behave during the second-term presidency of Donald Trump, whether they will learn from the past lessons and seek to de-escalate tensions or continue partisan fights.

Bibliografia

ABC7. (2018, June 19). Nancy Pelosi to President Trump on Family Separation: ‘Stop This Inhumane, Barbaric Policy’. ABC7. Retrieved from: https://abc7.com/immigration-children-separated-from-parents-center-in-texas-reform/3617844/.

Arbatli, E., & Rosenberg, D. (2021). United We Stand, Divided We Rule: How Political Polarization Erodes Democracy. Democratization, 28(2), 285–307. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2020.1818068.

Baptist, N.K., & Clark, K.A. (2024). Unmasking the Authoritarian Mob Boss: A Critical Analysis of Donald Trump’s Political Leadership. Social Sciences, 13(8), 397. DOI: 10.3390/socsci13080397.

Bowman, B., Kamisar, B., & Marquez, A. (2025, March 16). Democratic Party Hits New Polling Low, While Its Voters Want to Fight Trump Harder. NBC News. Retrieved from: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/democratic-party-hits-new-polling-low-voters-want-fight-trump-harder-rcna196161.

CBS New York. (2019, July 19). Democratic Senators Visit Detention Centers along Southern Border. CBS News. Retrieved from: https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/democratic-senators-visit-detention-centers-along-southern-border/.

Chu, J. (2021). H.R.1333 – NO BAN Act. Congress.gov. Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1333.

Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (2019). Introduction. In: T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 1–13). Brookings Institution Press.

Diamond, L. (1990). Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 1(3), 48–60. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1990.0047.

Diamond, L. (2024, October 22). How to End the Democratic Recession: The Fight against Autocracy Needs a New Playbook. Foreign Affairs, 103(6), 126–140. Retrieved from and cited after: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/how-end-democratic-recession-autocracy-larry-diamond.

DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755.

Drezner, D.W. (2020). Immature Leadership: Donald Trump and the American Presidency. International Affairs, 96(2), 383–400. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiaa009.

Firozi, P. (2017, January 24). President Trump Tweets to Congratulate Fox on Its Inauguration Ratings. The Hill. Retrieved from: https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/315995-president-trump-tweets-to-congratulate-fox-on-its-inauguration-ratings/.

Fredericks, B. (2020, July 22). Rep. Ilhan Omar Slams ‘Hateful’ US Travel Ban on Terror-Plagued Countries. New York Post. Retrieved from: https://nypost.com/2020/07/22/rep-ilhan-omar-rips-trumps-travel-ban-on-muslim-majority-countries/.

Galston, W.A. (2018, June 18). As Trump’s Zero-Tolerance Immigration Policy Backfires, Republicans Are in Jeopardy. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/trumps-zero-tolerance-immigration-policy-puts-republicans-in-jeopardy/.

Gaudiano, N. (2018, August 16). ‘The Press Is Not the Enemy of the People’, Senate Declares in Resolution. USA Today. Retrieved from: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/08/16/press-not-enemy-people-senate-declares-resolution-trump-comments/1011896002/.

Gerstein, J., & Rainey, R. (2020, June 18). Supreme Court Rejects Trump Effort to End DACA. Politico. Retrieved from: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/18/supreme-court-daca-decision-328255.

González, R.J. (2018). Cruel and Unusual. Anthropology Today, 34(5), 3–4. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8322.12457.

Grynbaum, M.M. (2018, November 13). CNN Sues Trump Administration for Barring Jim Acosta from White House. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/business/media/cnn-jim-acosta-trump-lawsuit.html.

Kim, S.M., & Romm, T. (2017, January 29). Schumer: Democrats Will Try to Undo Trump Ban. Politico. Retrieved from: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/senate-schumer-legislation-immigrants-refugees-234334.

Leeper, T.J. (2014). The Informational Basis for Mass Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 27–46. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nft045.

McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234–271. DOI: 10.1177/0002716218818782.

Milačić, F. (2021, March). The Negative Impact of Polarization on Democracy. Friedrich–Ebert-Stiftung Analysis. Vienna: FES Regional Office for Cooperation and Peace in Europe. Retrieved from: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/wien/18175.pdf.

Montanaro, D. (2025, March 18). Democrats Aren’t Unified in Their Response to President Trump’s Executive Actions. NPR. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5331244/democrats-arent-unified-in-their-response-to-president-trumps-executive-actionsNPR.

NILC [National Immigration Law Center]. (2017, November 28). Dream Act 2017: Summary and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from: https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DreamAct2017-summary-and-facts.pdf.

Novoa, G., Echelbarger, M., Gelman, A., & Gelman, S.A. (2023). Generically Partisan: Polarization in Political Communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(47), e2309361120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309361120.

Pain, P., & Masullo Chen, G. (2019). The President Is In: Public Opinion and the Presidential Use of Twitter. Social media + Society, 5(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305119855143.

Padala, A., & Conrad, L. (2021). Political Polarization during 2017–2021. Journal of Student Research, 10(3), 1–12. DOI: 10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.1817.

Pelosi, N. (2017, February 5). Pelosi Statement on Nationwide Ruling against Refugee & Muslim Ban. Retrieved from: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/pelosi-statement-on-nationwide-ruling-against-refugee-muslim-ban.

Pew Research Center. (2019, January 16). Most Border Wall Opponents, Supporters Say Shutdown Concessions Are Unacceptable: Partisan Divide on Whether Shutdown Is ‘Very Serious’ Problem. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/01/16/most-border-wall-opponents-supporters-say-shutdown-concessions-are-unacceptable/.

Pinto, J.F. (2024). Democratic and Populist Leadership: Between Democracy and Autocracy. In: A. Akande (Ed.), Leadership and Politics: New Perspectives in Business, Government and Society (pp. 489–507). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-56415-4_20.

Quealy, K. (2021, January 19). The Complete List of Trump’s Twitter Insults (2015–2021). The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/19/upshot/trump-complete-insult-list.html#.

Rustow, D.A. (1990). Democracy: A Global Revolution?. Foreign Affairs, 69(4), 75–91. DOI: 10.2307/20044497.

Sanders, B. (2018, June 26). Sanders Statement on Muslim Ban Ruling. Retrieved from: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-statement-on-muslim-ban-ruling/.

Savage, Ch. (2020, June 5). Appeals Court Blocks White House from Suspending Reporter’s Press Pass. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/us/politics/brian-karem-press-pass-white-house.html.

Schmidt, M.S. (2025, April 7). In Trump’s Second Term, Retribution Comes in Many Forms. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/07/us/politics/trump-biden-law-firms-revenge.html.

Schmitter, Ph.C., & Karl, T.L. (1991). What Democracy Is… and Is Not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1991.0033.

Seimel, A. (2024). Elite Polarization – The Boon and Bane of Democracy: Evidence from Thirty Democracies. Electoral Studies, 90, 102801. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102801.

Shear, M.D., Haberman, M., & Qiu, L. (2020, May 11). Trump White House Orders Staff to Wear Masks as Trump Misrepresents Testing Record. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/us/politics/white-house-masks-trump-coronavirus.html.

Somer, M., McCoy, J.L., & Luke, R.E. (2023). Pernicious Polarization, Autocratization and Opposition Strategies. In: A. Lührmann, & W. Merkel (Eds.), Resilience of Democracy: Responses to Illiberal and Authoritarian Challenges (pp. 61–80). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003363507-4.

Stolberg, S.G. (2019, June 18). Ocasio-Cortez Calls Migrant Detention Centers ‘Concentration Camps’, Eliciting Backlash. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/us/politics/ocasio-cortez-cheney-detention-centers.html.

Tlaib, R. [@RashidaTlaib]. (2020, January 10). This is straight up racism [Post]. X. Retrieved from: https://x.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1215762318908428289.

Trump, D. [@realDonaldTrump]. (2017, February 17). The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People! [Post]. X. Retrieved from: https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/832708293516632065.

Vanderbilt University. (2024, February 14). Latest Vanderbilt Unity Index Shows the U.S. Continuing Its Trend toward Increased Political Polarization. Retrieved from: https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2024/02/14/latest-vanderbilt-unity-index-shows-the-u-s-continuing-its-trend-toward-increased-political-polarization/.

Yourish, K., & Lee, J.C. (2019, January 28). The Demise of the White House Press Briefing under Trump. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/22/us/politics/white-house-press-briefing.html.

Historia i Polityka

Pobrania

  • pdf (English)

Opublikowane

24-03-2026

Jak cytować

1.
DEMCZUK, Andrzej. Polarization in the U.S.: Trump’s First-Term Policies and Democratic Responses: Lessons for a Trump 2.0 Era. Historia i Polityka [online]. 24 marzec 2026, nr 56 (63), s. 25–40. [udostępniono 26.3.2026]. DOI 10.12775/HiP.2026.011.
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polski)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Pobierz cytowania
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numer

Nr 56 (63) (2026)

Dział

Papers

Licencja

Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Andrzej Demczuk

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu respektuje prawo do prywatności i ochrony danych osobowych autorów.
Dane autorów nie są wykorzystywane w celach handlowych i marketingowych. Redaktorzy i recenzenci są zobowiązani do zachowania w poufności wszelkich informacji związanych ze złożonymi do redakcji tekstami.

Autor, zgłaszając swój tekst wyraża zgodę na wszystkie warunki i zapisy umowy licencyjnej (określającej prawa autorskie) z Uniwersytetem Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 12
Liczba cytowań: 0

Wyszukiwanie

Wyszukiwanie

Przeglądaj

  • Indeks autorów
  • Lista archiwalnych numerów

Użytkownik

Użytkownik

Aktualny numer

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informacje

  • dla czytelników
  • dla autorów
  • dla bibliotekarzy

Newsletter

Zapisz się Wypisz się

Język / Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tagi

Szukaj przy pomocy tagu:

polarization, the U.S., democracy, Donald Trump, Democratic Party

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

W górę

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partnerzy platformy czasopism

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu Deklaracja dostępności Sklep wydawnictwa