Elephant in the Room: How to Assess the Vote-weighting System in the Council of the EU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2024.029Słowa kluczowe
voting power, Council of the European Union, EU institutional reform, QMV, weighted voting, power indices, blocking coalitionAbstrakt
The article emphasises the complementarity of research based on voting power theory with the analysis of the structure of blocking. Combining both methods enables a more comprehensive assessment of the vote weighting system in the Council of the EU, in particular the impact of changes in the voting system on the position of individual Member States and the power balance in this institution. I make two contributions to the existing literature. Firstly, the study develops a non-random voting model, dedicated to QMV in the Council, which abandons the assumption that each coalition of players is equally likely and takes into account the role of the European Commission as an agenda-setter. This not only allows us to exclude many coalitions that are only theoretically possible, but also to analyse the blocking structure from the perspective of different states or coalitions in the Council. Secondly, it shows that the application of blocking structure analysis provides novel insights into the Council’s voting system. Unlike the a priori voting power approach, such analysis does not focus on distribution of winning power in the Council, but on the Member States’ ability to build minimal blocking coalitions. Hence, it complements the application of mathematical indices of voting power in the assessment of the voting system in this institution.
Bibliografia
Albert, M. (2004). The Voting Power Approach: Unresolved Ambiguities. European Union
Politics, 5(1), 139-146. DOI: 10.1177/1465116504040449.
Albert, M. (2003). The Voting Power Approach: Measurement without Theory. European Union Politics, 4(3), 351-366. DOI: 10.1177/14651165030043.
Álvarez-Mozos, M., Hellman, Z., & Winter, E. (2013). Spectrum Value for Coalitional Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 82,132–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2013.06.011.
Banzhaf, J.F. (1965). Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19(2), 317–343.
Barr, J., & Passarelli, F. (2009). Who Has the Power in the EU? Mathematical Social Sciences, 57(3),339–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.12.007.
Barry, B. (1980a). Is It Better to Be Powerful or Lucky?: Part I. Political Studies, 28(2),183–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb01244.x.
Barry, B. (1980b). Is It Better to Be Powerful or Lucky?: Part II. Political Studies, 28(3), 338–352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb00473.x.
Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, Ch. (2020). EU Actors under Pressure: Politicisation and Depoliticisation as Strategic Responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2020.1713193.
Bunse, S., Magnette, P., & Nicolaïdis, K. (2005, November). Is the Commission the Small Member States’ Best Friend? SIEPS Report No. 9. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. Retrieved from: https://www.sieps.se/en/publications/2005/is-the-commission-the-small-member-states-best-friend-20059/Sieps-2005-9.pdf?.
Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, (O.J. UE, C 202, 7.06.2016).
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, (O.J. UE, C 202, 7.06.2016).
Cameron, D.R. (2004). The Stalemate in the Constitutional IGC over the Definition of a QualifiedMajority. European Union Politics, 5(3), 373–391. DOI:10.1177/1465116504045158.
Coleman, J.S. (1971). Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act. In: B. Liebermann (Ed.). Social Choice (pp.269–300). New York: Gordon and Breach.
Czaputowicz, J., & Kleinowski, M. (2018). The Voting Systems in the Council of the EU and the Bundesrat – What Do They Tell Us about European Federalism? Perspectives on Federalism, 10(1), 174–199. DOI: 10.2478/pof-2018-0009.
Eurostat. (2022). Usually Resident Population on 1 January [Last Update on October 7, 2022]. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_urespop/default/table?lang=en.
Felsenthal, D., & Machover, M. (1998). The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Gábor, J. (2020). Impact of Brexit on Voting Power in Council of the European Union. Open Political Science, 3(1), 192–197. DOI: 10.1515/openps-2020-0016.
Garrett, G., & Tsebelis, G. (1999a). Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the European Union? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(3), 291–308. DOI: 10.1177/0951692899011003001.
Garrett, G., & Tsebelis, G. (1999b). More Reasons to Resist the Temptation of Power Indices to the European Union. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(3), 331–333. DOI:10.1177/0951692899011003004.
Grech, Ph.D. (2021). Power in the Council of the EU: Organizing Theory, a New Index, and Brexit.Social Choice and Welfare, 56, 223–258. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-020-01273-z.
Hix, S., Frantescu, D., & Hagemann, S. (2022, September). VoteWatch Europe European Parliament and EU Council Voting Data. Retrieved from: https://simonhix.com/projects/.
Hobolt, S.B., & Rodon, T. (2020). Domestic Contestation of the European Union.Journal of European Public Policy, 27(2), 161–167. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2019.1701066.
Hosli, M.O., & Machover, M. (2004). The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council: A Reply to Moberg (2002). Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(3), 497–521. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00516.x.
Ion, O.A. (2023). Assessing the Fairness of the EU Council Qualified Majority Voting. A Voting Power Critical Perspective of the Liberal Intergovernmentalist Accounts. European Journal of Government and Economics, 12(1), 39–57.DOI: 10.17979/ejge.2023.12.1.9335.
Kleinowski, M. (2018). The impact of Brexit on the voting power in the Council of the
European Union. Przegląd Europejski, 4, 95–117. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.3456.
Kleinowski, M. (2023). Analysis of the Structure of Blocking as an Alternative to the Application of the Power Index Approach. Athenaeum. Polish Political Science Studies, 78, 159-182. DOI: 10.15804/athena.2023.78.09.
Laloux, T., & Delreux, T. (2021).The Origins of EU Legislation: Agenda-Setting, Intra-Institutional Decision-Making or Interinstitutional Negotiations? West European Politics, 44(7), 1555–1576. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2020.1836861.
Laruelle, A., & Valenciano, F. (2005). Assessing Success and Decisiveness in Voting Situations. Social Choice and Welfare, 24(1), 171–197. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0298-7.
Laruelle, A., &Valenciano, F. (2008). Voting and Collective DecisionMaking: Bargaining and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laursen, F. (Ed.). (2008). The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Lindner, I. (2008). The Power of a Collectivity to Act in Weighted Voting Games with Many Small Voters. Social Choice and Welfare, 30(4), 581–601. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-007-0256-x.
List, Ch. (2003). The voting power approach: a theory of measurement. A response to Max Albert. London LSE Research Online. Retrieved from: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/700/1/List-EUPolitics.pdf.
Mercik, J., & Ramsey, D.M. (2017). The Effect of Brexit on the Balance of Power in the European Union Council: An Approach Based on Pre-coalitions. In: J. Mercik, N.T. Nguyen, R. Kowalczyk (Eds.). Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII (pp. 87–107). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_7.
Moberg, A. (2002). The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 259–282. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00354.
Moberg, A. (2007). Is the Double Majority Really Double? The Second Round in the Debate of the Voting Rules in the EU Constitutional Treaty. Working Paper, 23. Madrid: Real Institution Elcano.Retrieved from:https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/work-document/is-the-double-majority-really-double-the-second-round-in-the-debate-of-the-voting-rules-in-the-eu-constitutional-treaty/.
Moberg, A. (2014). The Weight of Nations: Four Papers on the Institutional Negotiations in the EU 1996–2007. Malmö. Retrieved from: https://jagielloniancompromise.eu/download/weight_of_nations.pdf.
Owen, G. (2013). Game Theory (4thEd.).Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Passarelli, F., & Barr, J. (2007). Preferences, the Agenda Setter, and the Distribution of Power in the EU. Social Choice and Welfare, 28(1), 41–60. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-006-0155-6.
Phinnemore, D. (2013). The Treaty of Lisbon: Origins and Negotiation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137367877.
Pircher, B., & Farjam, M. (2021). Oppositional voting in the Council of the EU between 2010
and 2019: Evidence for differentiated politicisation. European Union Politics, 22(3), 472–494. DOI: 10.1177/14651165211004754.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Report of the Franco-German Working Group on the EU Institutional Reform. (2023, September 18).Sailing on High Seas: Reforming and Enlarging the EU for the 21st Century. Paris–Berlin. Retrieved from: https://ue.delegfrance.org/IMG/pdf/franco-german_report_eureforms.pdf?11549/0625e1cce880436361f09496a2d3101c6f963b29.
Roos, Ch. (2019). Opposition or Consensus in the Justice and Home Affairs Council? The How and Why of Increasing Member State Contestation over EU Policy. Journal of European Integration, 41(5), 569–586.DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2018.1537269.
Shapley, L.S., & Shubik, M. (1954). A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System. American Political Science Review, 48(3), 787–792. DOI:10.2307/1951053.
Sozański, T. (2010). The Blocking Power in Voting Systems. In: M.A. Cichocki, & K. Życzkowski (Eds.). Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union (pp. 75–92). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Sozański, T. (2014). The Conception of Blocking Power as a Key to the Understanding of the History of Designing Voting Systems for the EU Council. Decyzje, 22, 5–46. DOI: 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.32.
Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision-Making before and after Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139005357.
Trzaskowski, R. (2005). Dynamika reformy systemu podejmowania decyzji w Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza.
van Gruisen, Ph., & Crombez, Ch. (2019). National Parliamentary Control and Voting in the Council of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 981–1000. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12316.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Marcin Kleinowski
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu respektuje prawo do prywatności i ochrony danych osobowych autorów.
Dane autorów nie są wykorzystywane w celach handlowych i marketingowych. Redaktorzy i recenzenci są zobowiązani do zachowania w poufności wszelkich informacji związanych ze złożonymi do redakcji tekstami.
Autor, zgłaszając swój tekst wyraża zgodę na wszystkie warunki i zapisy umowy licencyjnej (określającej prawa autorskie) z Uniwersytetem Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 276
Liczba cytowań: 0
