Turkey’s Presence in the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence in the Context of Turkey’s Soft Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2022.014Słowa kluczowe
Istanbul Convention, Turkey, soft power, Turkey’s soft powerAbstrakt
The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, commonly known as the Istanbul Convention, and in Poland also as the anti-violence convention, was opened for signature in Istanbul on May 11, 2011. Turkey was one of the first countries to sign and ratify the document. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, then as Prime Minister-in-Office, was one of the great advocates of Ankara ratifying the Convention. However, the politician, already as president, “celebrated” the Republic’s decade-long presence in the Convention by signing a decree in March 2021 annulling Turkey’s ratification of the document. The text aims to analyse Turkey’s involvement in the preparation and subsequent adoption of the Istanbul Convention in the context of building Turkish soft power on the Old Continent. The text structure is as follows: the first part will define the concept of soft power and analyse the evolution of Turkish soft power. Then, the Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence will be described, and the next part will chronologically describe the presence of the Republic in the Convention. The last part analyses Turkey’s activities related to the preparation and adoption of the Istanbul Convention in the context of building Turkish soft power in Europe.
Bibliografia
Address by H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey on the Occasion of Handover of the Presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 11 May 2011, İstanbul. (2011). Retrieved August 8, 2021 from: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/address-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-the-republic-of-turkey-on-the-occasion-of-handover-of-the-presidency-of-the-committee-of-ministers-of-the-council-of-europe_-11-may-2011_-istanbul.en.mfa.
Ağırseven, N., & Örki, A. (2017). Evaluating Turkish TV Series as Soft Power Instruments. OPUS – International Journal of Society Researches, 7(13), 836–853. DOI: 10.26466/opus.353287.
Altan-Olcay, Ö., & Oder, B.E. (2021, June 2). Why Turkey΄s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention Is a Global Problem. Retrieved September 6, 2021 from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/why-turkeys-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-is-a-global-problem/.
Amnesty International. (2021, July 1). Turkey’s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention Rallies the Fight for Women’s Rights across the World. Retrieved August 9, 2021 from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/07/turkeys-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-rallies-the-fight-for-womens-rights-across-the-world-2/.
Anaz, N., & Özcan, C.C. (2016). Geography of Turkish Soap Operas: Tourism, Soft Power and Alternative Narratives. In: I. Egresi (ed.). Alternative Tourism in Turkey: Role, Potential Development and Sustainability (pp. 247–257). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47537-0_15.
Baranowska, G. (2013). Wpływ Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka na ustawodawstwo w Turcji. Uwagi w świetle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka dotyczącego wolności wyznania. In: E. Karska (ed.). Wpływ Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka na systemy ochrony praw człowieka oraz międzynarodowe prawo karne i humanitarne (pp. 339–355). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Mówią Wieki”.
Burek, W., & Sękowska-Kozłowska, K. (2020). Pięć lat obowiązywania Konwencji Rady Europy o zapobieganiu i zwalczaniu przemocy wobec kobiet i przemocy domowej w Polsce: stan gry. Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego, 18, 245–270. DOI: 10.26106/438f-sv51.
Buyuk, H.F. (2020, August 10). Istanbul Convention’s Fate Splits Turkish President’s Supporters. Retrieved September 11, 2021 from: https://balkaninsight.com/2020/08/10/istanbul-conventions-fate-splits-turkish-presidents-supporters/.
Buyuk, H.F. (2021, June 23). Report: Poland, Turkey Undermining Women’s and LGBT Rights. Retrieved August 8, 2021 from: https://balkaninsight.com/2021/06/23/report-poland-turkey-undermining-womens-and-lgbt-rights/.
Çevik, S.B. (2019). Reassessing Turkey’s Soft Power: The Rules of Attraction. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 44(1), 50–71. DOI: 10.1177/0304375419853751.
Cumhurbaşkanlığı’ndan İstanbul Sözleşmesi’ne dair ilk açıklama. (2021, March 21). Retrieved July 6, 2021 from: https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/son-dakika-cumhurbaskanligindan-istanbul-sozlesmesine-dair-ilk-aciklama-1822262.
Debatten um die Istanbul-Konvention. Kirchliche Proteste und Kritik. (2019, August). Nachrichtendienst Östliche Kirchen, pp. 11. Retrieved July 10, 2021 from: https://www.noek.info/bilder/dossier/N%C3%96K_dossier_istanbul-konvention.pdf.
Erdoğan’dan „İstanbul Sözleşmesi’” açıklaması (2021, July 1). Retrieved July 31, 2021 from: https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/erdogandan-istanbul-sozlesmesi-aciklamasi-1848937.
Fazeli, M. (2021). Reasons for Turkey’s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention, Its Consequences. Retrieved July 21, 2021 from: https://www.scfr.ir/en/politics/132023/reasons-for-turkeys-withdrawal-from-istanbul-convention-its-consequences/.
Grzyb, M. (2014). Kobietobójstwo – kryminologiczna charakterystyka zjawiska. Archiwum Kryminologii, 36, 75–107. DOI: 10.7420/AK2014C.
Historical Background. (n.d.). Council of Europe. Retrieved August 6, 2021 from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/historical-background.
İstanbul Sözleşmesi 2011 yılında bakın nasıl kabul edilmşti: Hepiniz oradaydınız. (2021, March 20). Retrieved August 8, 2021 from: https://odatv4.com/siyaset/istanbul-sozlesmesi-2011-yilinda-bakin-nasil-kabul-edilmisti-hepiniz-oradaydiniz-20032113-204075.
İstanbul Sözleşmesi: Sebep olan, hazırlayan, adını veren, ilk imzalayan Türkiye’ydi. (2021, March 20). Retrieved August 10, 2021 from: https://serbestiyet.com/haberler/istanbul-sozlesmesi-sebep-olan-hazirlayan-adini-veren-ilk-imzalayan-turkiyeydi-54507/.
Kepenek, E. (2020, July 22). ‘All Four Political Parties Agreed on İstanbul Convention When It Wwas first signed'. Retrieved August 9, 2021 from: https://bianet.org/english/male-violence/227869-all-four-political-parties-agreed-on-istanbul-convention-when-it-was-first-signed.
KONDA. İstanbul Sözleşmesi, Ağustos 2020 (2020). pp. 31. Retrieved August 1, 2021 from: https://bianet.org/system/uploads/1/files/attachments/000/003/181/original/Barometre_111_IstanbulSozlesmesi_%282%29.pdf?1599040170.
Łoś, R. (2018). Siła współczesnych państw. Ujęcie teoretyczne. Przegląd Politologiczny, 23(2), 31–44. DOI: 10.14746/pp.2018.23.2.2.
Mastrodonato, L. (2021, May 11). No One Needs the Istanbul Convention More Than Turkey, but Erdoğan Turns a Blind Eye. LifeGate. Retrieved July 10, 2021 from: https://www.lifegate.com/turkey-istanbul-convention-womens-rights.
Nye, J.S. (2007). Soft Power. Jak osiągnąć sukces w polityce światowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Ociepka, B. (2013). Miękka siła i dyplomacja publiczna Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Öztürk, A.E. (2020). The Ambivalence of Turkish Soft Power in Southeast Europe. Border Crossing, 10(2), 111–128. Retrieved January 31, 2021 from: https://journals.tplondon.com/bc/article/view/1050. DOI: 10.33182/bc.v10i2.1050.
Pierwsze sprawozdanie ogólne z działalności GREVIO obejmujące okres od września 2015 r. do maja 2019 r. (2021, February). Sekretariat mechanizmu monitorowania Konwencji Rady Europy o zapobieganiu i zwalczaniu przemocy wobec kobiet i przemocy domowej, pp. 78. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from: https://rm.coe.int/first-grevio-report-of-activities-polish/1680a1f12a.
Survey: Half of AKP Voters against Withdrawal from İstanbul Convention. (2020, July 27). Bianet. Retrieved September 2, 2021 from: https://bianet.org/english/women/228087-survey-half-of-akp-voters-against-withdrawal-from-istanbul-convention.
Statement by H.E. Ahmet Davutoğli, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey Regarding the Assumption of the Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers, 10 November 2010. (2010). Retrieved September 1, 2021 from: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/statement-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-the-republic-of-turkey-regarding-the-assumption-of-the-chairma.en.mfa.
Szyszlak, E. (2020, October 16). Tureckie zmagania z konwencją stambulską. Retrieved August 10, 2021 from: http://przemianyustrojowe.pl/eseje/tureckie-zmagania-z-konwencj-stambulsk.
The Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Turkey. Report. (2021, April 21). Parliamentary Assembly. Council of Europe, pp. 18. Retrieved September 2, 2021 from: https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/2050294/doc.+15272.pdf.
Turkey’s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention: A Retrogressive Step Back in the Protection of Women’s Human Rights Enshrined in the CEDAW Convention. (2021, July 1). Retrieved September 6, 2021 from: https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/turkey-s-withdrawal-istanbul-convention-retrogressive-step-back-protection-women-s.
Turkey’s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention: A Victory for the ‘Anti-Gender Agenda’?. (2021, April 12). Retrieved July 10, 2021 from: https://www.cyis.org/post/turkey-s-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-a-victory-for-the-anti-gender-agenda.
Turkey’s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention: Is It Justified?. (2021, April 15). Retrieved August 5, 2021 from: https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2021/04/ayushi-singh-turkey-istabul-convention/.
Türkiye İstanbul Sözleşmesi’nden Ayrıldı. (2021, March 20). Retrieved August 9, 2021 from: https://www.amerikaninsesi.com/a/turkiye-istanbul-sozlesmesinden-ayrildi/5821927.html.
UN Women’s Rights Committee Urges Turkey to Reconsider Withdrawal from Istanbul Convention as Decision Takes Effect. (2021, July 1). Retrieved July 30, 2021 from: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=27242&LangID=E.
Woźnica, R. (2019). Soft power w polityce Turcji wobec Bałkanów. In: D. Gibas-Krzak (ed.). Bałkańska szachownica: geopolityczne i geostrategiczne studia o Bałkanach w XX i XXI wieku (pp. 197–218). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Wódka, J. (2012). Nowy wymiar tureckich aspiracji mocarstwowych. Soft power Turcji. In: R Bania, & K. Zdulski (eds.). Bezpieczeństwo narodowe i międzynarodowe w regionie Bliskiego Wschodu i Północnej Afryki (MENA) u progu XXI wieku (pp. 37–54). Łódź: Katedra Bliskiego Wschodu i Północnej Afryki. Retrieved July 17, 2021 from: https://www.academia.edu/10996923/Nowy_wymiar_tureckich_aspiracji_mocarstwowych_Soft_power_Turcji.
Wódka, J. (2019). Polityka zagraniczna średniej potęgi. Turcja jako studium przypadku. Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Zestawienie – Przemoc domowa. (2020, February). European Court of Human Rights, pp. 15. Retrieved August 4, 2021 from: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Domestic_violence_POL.pdf.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Elżbieta Szyszlak
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu respektuje prawo do prywatności i ochrony danych osobowych autorów.
Dane autorów nie są wykorzystywane w celach handlowych i marketingowych. Redaktorzy i recenzenci są zobowiązani do zachowania w poufności wszelkich informacji związanych ze złożonymi do redakcji tekstami.
Autor, zgłaszając swój tekst wyraża zgodę na wszystkie warunki i zapisy umowy licencyjnej (określającej prawa autorskie) z Uniwersytetem Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 271
Liczba cytowań: 0