Reproduction of Artworks in the Lippmannian-Frankfurtian Debates During Advanced Technology Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2021.033Słowa kluczowe
propaganda, persuasion, manipulation, reproduction, artworkAbstrakt
The development of technology leads to mechanical reproduction of artworks. This tendency brings the paradox whether mechanical reproduction of artworks enlightens or blinds society. Optimistic perspective of Walter Benjamin and Lippmannian school on reproducibility faces pessimistic view of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Thus, the main aim of this paper is to compare W. Lippmann, W. Benjamin, T. Adorno and M. Horkheimer’s views and summarize by checking suitability of two schools’ perspectives in advanced technological century.
Bibliografia
Adorno, T.W. (1991). On the Fetish Character in Music and the Regression of Listening. In: T.W. Adorno, The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture (pp. 26–52). London: Routledge.
Beight, D.C. (2015). Walter Lippmann Saw the Future in Social Media. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/7609521/Walter_Lippmann_Saw_the_Future_in_Social_Media.
Benjamin, W. (1935). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. New York: Schocken Books.
Bernays, E. (1928). Propaganda. USA: Horace Liveright.
Biberstein, T. (2019, September 18). We Dance Together, We Fight Together. Retrieved from https://crisisandcommunitas.com/?inter_art=we-dance-together-we-fight-together.
Correia, J.C. (2010). Politics, Technology and the Media: The Originality of Walter Benjamin. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265685084_Politics_technology_and_the_media_the_originality_of_Walter_Benjamin. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.5182.0803.
Fiske, S.T. (2005). Social Cognition and the Normality of Prejudgment. In: J.F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L.A. Rudman (Eds.), On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport (pp. 36–53). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
Gumbrecht, H., & Marrinan, M. (Eds.) (2003). Mapping Benjamin: The Work of Art in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(1), 107–112. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (1947). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kaes, A., Jay, M., & Dimendberg, E. (Eds.) (1995). The Weimar Republic Sourcebook. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kutner, D. (2017). Aura, Technology, and Society: Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin on the Revolutionary Potential of Art. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/33117627/Aura_Technology_and_Society_Theodor_Adorno_and_Walter_Benjamin_on_the_Revolutionary_Potential_of_Art?auto=download.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
Meek, A. (2011). Trauma and Media: Theories, Histories, and Images. New York, London: Routledge.
Meredith, S. (2018, March 21). Here’s Everything You Need to Know about the Cambridge Analytica Scandal. Retrieved from: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/21/facebook-cambridge-analytica-scandal-everything-you-need-to-know.html.
Miller, J.H. (1992). Illustration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raunig, G. (2011). Creative Industries as Mass Deception. In: G. Raunig, G. Ray, & U. Wuggenig (Eds.), Critique of Creativity: Precarity, Subjectivity and Resistance in the ‘Creative Industries’ (pp. 191–203). London: Mayfly.
Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland Jr., W.P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. DOI: 10.1177/0093650205279209.
Slothuus, R., & De Vreese, C.H. (2010). Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645. DOI: 10.1017/s002238161000006x.
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., De Vreese, C., Matthes, J., ... & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.
Wanless, A., & Berk, M. (2017). Participatory Propaganda: The Engagement of Audiences in the Spread of Persuasive Communications. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329281610_Participatory_Propaganda_The_Engagement_of_Audiences_in_the_Spread_of_Persuasive_Communications.
Yilmaz, N., & Kilicoglu, G. (2018) Türkiye’nin Orta Asya’daki Yumuşak Gücü Ve Kamu Diplomasisi Uygulamalarinin Analizi. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, 119, 141–184. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tda/issue/59374/852064.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 Azer Binnatli
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu respektuje prawo do prywatności i ochrony danych osobowych autorów.
Dane autorów nie są wykorzystywane w celach handlowych i marketingowych. Redaktorzy i recenzenci są zobowiązani do zachowania w poufności wszelkich informacji związanych ze złożonymi do redakcji tekstami.
Autor, zgłaszając swój tekst wyraża zgodę na wszystkie warunki i zapisy umowy licencyjnej (określającej prawa autorskie) z Uniwersytetem Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 408
Liczba cytowań: 0
