Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
    • Українська

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • About journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Council
    • Board of Reviewers
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Peer Review Process
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Article Processing Charges and Submission Charges
    • Privacy Statement
    • Abstract and Index Services
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski
  • Українська
Records Group. The problem of fonds in the American archival studies
  • Home
  • /
  • Records Group. The problem of fonds in the American archival studies
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 8(10) (2017) /
  4. STUDIES

Records Group. The problem of fonds in the American archival studies

Authors

  • Bartosz Nowożycki Naczelna Dyrekcja Archiwów Państwowych w Warszawie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/AKZ.2017.005

Keywords

archival theory, archival fonds, record group, American archival studies, National Archives in Washington

Abstract

The term record group means a group of fonds (records) and it is a type of archival fonds rarely described in Polish archival literature. Most often it is associated with the complex archival fonds, due to its comlicated structure and blurred borderlines – an effect of administrative system varying from the Polish one. The post-war attempts to modify and broaden the meaning of the complex fonds caused its resemblance to the term record group. Irena Radtke in her paper given during the 6th Archival Methods Conference in Warsaw in 1970 proposed, that the complex fonds should be one comprising records of foreign provenance that are an effect of passive succession. Bohdan Ryszewski, addressing Radtke’s idea, noticed that passive succession might be a source of complications. However, this conceptualization of the definition of the complex fonds did not correspond with the American understanding of it as an above-fonds structure.
Bogdan Kroll has touched the core of the problem; he noticed that an archival construction comprising materials of various provenances cannot be seen neither as an archival fonds, nor as a complex fonds. He saw a discrepancy between the structure and partition of archival holdings and archival theory; thus Kroll proposed abandoning the term complex fonds and implementation of the term archival complex. The archival complex was supposed to be archival materials of various origins merged (in or outside of an archive) into fonds, or parts of archival fonds of different institutions having the same characteristic – function. The complex was supposed to make up a separate entity in logic structure of archival holdings, comprising of all archival fonds and/or their pieces being parts of the main fonds of the complex. The problem of lack of above-fonds forms in the Polish archival theory has been also noticed by Józef Siemieński, who has formulated the term of higher-order fonds. According to his idea the higher-order fonds was a fonds of archival fonds created by various authorities and agencies (in one system) that constituted separate hierarchy. In this article the Author used translation of the term record group into Polish grupa zespołów (akt). The term was defined in 1941 by Solon Justus Buck, in charge of the National Archives in Washington. The term record group was understood as a unit of logical division of archival holdings, set up in arbitrary way, which size and character was convenient for its processing and providing access to, while respecting the principle of provenance.

Author Biography

Bartosz Nowożycki, Naczelna Dyrekcja Archiwów Państwowych w Warszawie

Bartosz Nowożycki received an M.A. in history from the University of Warsaw in 2007 and a Ph.D. in archival science from Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun in 2016. He is senior specialist in the department of archival sciences at the Head Office of the State Archives in Warsaw, Poland. Nowożycki was visiting archivist at the Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences of America (2010–2011) and the Jozef Pilsudski Institute of America (2011–2016), both in New York. Nowożycki is author or co-author of eight books and over thirty articles. His research interests focus on modern history and archival theory and practice.

References

Archival Principles Selections From the Writings of Waldo Gifford Leland, oprac. T. R. Schellenberg, "National Archives Staff Information Papers” 1955, no. 20.

Archives, personal papers, and manuscripts: A cataloging manual far archival repositories, historical societies, and manuscript libraries, oprac. S. L. Hensen, Chicago 1989.

Bearman D. A., Lytle R. H., The Power of Principle of Provenance, “Archivaria” 1985-1986, no. 21.

Berner R. C., Archival Theory and Practice In the United States: A Historical Analysis, Seattle - Londyn 1983.

Berner R., Perspective on the Record Group Concept, “Georgia Archive” 1976, vol. 4, no. 1.

Cook T., The Concept of the Archival Fonds In the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions, “Archivaria” 1993, no. 35.

Cox R. J., Dollar Ch., Hirsch R., Wosh P. J., Founding Brothers: Leland Buck and Cappon and the Formation of the Archives Profession, “The American Archivist” 2011 supplement, vol. 74.

Eastwood T., Jenkinson's Writings on Some Enduring Archival Themes, "The American Archivist” 2004, vol. 67, no. 1.

Evans M. J., Authority Control: An Alternative to the Records Group Concept, "The American Archivist” 1986, vol. 49, no. 3.

Fenyo M. D., The Record Group Concept: A Critique, "The American Archivist” 1966, vol. 29, no. 2.

Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology, red. R. Pearce-Moses, Chicago 2005.

Gilliland-Swetland L. J., The Provenance of a Profession: The Permanence of the Public Archives and Historical Manuscripts Traditions in American Archival History, [w:] American archival studies: readings in theory and practice, red. R. C. Jimerson, Chicago 2000.

Holmes O. W.., Archival Arrangement - Five Different Operations at Five Different Levels, [w:] Modern Archives Reader: Basic Readings on Archival Theory and Practice, red. M. F. Daniels, T. Walch, Waszyngton 1984.

Jenkinson H., A Manual of Archival Administration, Londyn 1966.

Konarski K., Nowożytna archiwistyka i jej zadania, Warszawa 1929.

Konarski K., Podstawowe zasady archiwistyki, "Archeion” 1951, t. 19/20.

Kroll B., Porządkowanie najnowszych archiwaliów, "Archeion” 1984, t. 27.

Manteuffel T., Dziedziczenia registratura ich porządkowanie, "Archeion” 1927, t. 1.

Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives; oprac. S. Muller, J. Feith i R. Fruin, Chicago 2003.

Nowożycki B., Instytucje archiwalne przechowujące dokumenty rząd federalnego USA do 1934 r., "Archiwista Polski” 2014, nr 1.

Objaśnienia do ankiety archiwalnej, "Archeion” 1934, t. 12.

Przelaskowski P., Program prac wewnętrznych w archiwach nowożytnych, Warszawa 1935.

Rabe Barritt M., Comming to America: Dutch Archivistiek and American Archival Practice, "Archival Issues” 1993, vol. 18, no. 1.

Radtke I., Pojęcie zespołu w praktyce archiwalnej, "Archeion” 1971, t. 46.

Ross R. A., The National Archives: The Formative Years, 1934-1949, [w:] Guardian of Heritage: Essays on the History of the National Archives, Waszyngton 1985.

Ryszewski B., Z zagadnień zespołu archiwalnego, "Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici”, Historia 1973, t. 8.

Schellenberg T. R., Modern Archives Principles & Practices, Chicago 2003.

Schellenberg T.R., The Management of Archives, Chicago 1964.

Scott P.J., The Record Group Concept: A Case for Abandonment, "The American Archivist” 1966, vol. 29, no. 4.

Siemieński J, Przewodnik po archiwach polskich, t. 1: Archiwa dawnej Rzeczypospolitej, Warszawa 1933.

Seventh Annual Report of the Archivist of the United States. For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1941, Waszyngton 1942.

The Control of Records at the Record Group Level, “Staff Information Circular”1950, no. 15.

Thomassen T., New Respect for the Old Order: The Context of the Dutch Manual, "The American Archivist” 2003, vol. 66, no. 2.

Tschan R., A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal, "The American Archivist” 2002, vol. 65, no. 2.

Vincent C., A case study. The Records Group: A Concept in Evolution, “Archivaria” 1976/1977, no. 3.

Downloads

  • PDF (Język Polski)

Published

2017-12-11

How to Cite

1.
NOWOŻYCKI, Bartosz. Records Group. The problem of fonds in the American archival studies. Archiwa – Kancelarie – Zbiory. Online. 11 December 2017. No. 8(10), pp. 129-146. [Accessed 6 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/AKZ.2017.005.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 8(10) (2017)

Section

STUDIES

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 569
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

archival theory, archival fonds, record group, American archival studies, National Archives in Washington
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

 

 


© 2021 Akademicka Platforma Czasopism Sklep wydawnictwa