Embodied Thoughts Concepts and compositionality without language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2008.004Keywords
embodied thoughts, concepts, compositionality without language, analogy, analogical inferenceAbstract
This paper first and foremost aims at defending what we believe to be a step in that direction of the proper view of thinking, a view we call the spatial-motor view. In order to do so, however, we have found it essential to start by addressing the conceptual confusion just alluded to. Accordingly, the paper proceeds in two steps. First a conceptual step, in which we reconsider some of the traditional categories brought into play when thinking about thinking. Then an empirical step, in which we offer empirical evidence for one of the views conceptually isolated during -he first part of the work. Future version of this collaborative work will include a speculative step in which we spin out an evolutionary and developmental scenario whose function is to justify the spatial-motor view by showing how it fits into current evolutionary and developmental theories.References
Allen, C. & Bekoff, M. (1997). Species of Mind. The Philosophy and Biology of Cognitive Ethology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Application Challenges to Computational Geometry. The Computational Geometry Impact Task Force Report, B. Chazelle et al., Advances in Discrete and Computational Geometry, Contemporary Mathematics, 223, AMS, Providence (1999), 407-463.
Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
Barsalou, L.W., Simmons, W.K., Barbey, A., & Wilson, C.D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91.
Berlucchi G. and Aglioti S. (1997) The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends Neurosci., 20:560-564.
Bermudez, J.L.(2003) Thinking Without Words. Oxford University Press.
Brooks, R. A.,,,Intelligence Without Representation”, Artificial Intelligence Journal (47), 1991, pp. 139-159.
Carroll, L, „What the Tortoise Said to Achilles” Mind 4, No. 14 (April 1895): 278-280. Clark, A. (1997). Being There. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Cummins, R. (1996) Systematicity. The Journal of Philosophy, 93: 591-614.
Dennett, D.C. (1995) The Role of Language in Intelligence in „What is Intelligence?”,The Darwin College Lectures, ed. Jean Khalfa, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.
Dretske F. (1981), Knowledge and Flow of Information, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. Forkman B. (2000) Domestic hens have declarative representations. Animal Cognition 3: 135-137.
Gallistel CR (1990) The Organization of Learning, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press Grice,
H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Grush, Rick (2003). In defence of some «Cartesian» assumptions concerning the brain and its operation. Biology and Philosophy 18:53-93.
Grush, Rick (2003,forthcoming). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Grush, Rick (to appear). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Harman, G. (2002) „The Logic of Ordinary Language,” an attempt to distinguish logical principles from others, in Common Sense, Reasoning, and Rationality, edited by Renee Elio (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 93-103.
Kirsh, D. Today the Earwig Tomorrow Man? Artificial Intelligence. (1991). Reprinted in Artificial Life, ed M, Boden, OUP. 1996.
MacDorman, K. F. (1999). Grounding symbols through sensorimotor integration. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 77(1), 20-24.
Maravita A. et al. (2003) Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr. Biol., 13:R531-R539.
Maravita, A. & Iriki,A. (2004) Tools for the body (schema) Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8:79-86.
Mitchell, J.S.B. (1997) Introduction: Special Issue of Algorithmica devoted to Computational Geometry and Manufacturing, Algorithmica 19: 1-3.
Proust, J. (1999) Mind, space and objectivity in non-human animals. Erkenntnis, 51, L 41-58.
Relevance Theory. Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. In Horn, L.R. & Ward, G. (eds.) (2004) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607-632.
Richard S. Sutton. Integrated architectures for learning, planning, and reacting based on approximating dynamic programming. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning, Austin, TX, 1990. Morgan Kaufmann.
Richard S. Sutton. Planning by incremental dynamic programming. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 353-357. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
Roger C. Conant and W. Ross Ashby, „Every Good Regulator of a System Must be a Model of that System”, International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 1, No. 2 (1970),
Shaun Gallagher and Jonathan Cole. 1995. „Body Schema and Body Image in a Deafferented Subject,” Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (1995), 369-390; reprinted ,” in Body and Flesh: A Philosophical Reader, ed. Donn Welton (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 131-147.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1986a. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford and Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA . (Second edition 1995. Blackwell, Oxford .)
Stein, L. A., „Imagination and Situated Cognition,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 6, 393—407, 1994. Reprinted in Android Epistemology, K. M. Ford, C. Glymour, and P. J. Hayes, eds., AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1995, pp. 167—182.
Wimsatt, W.C. 1986. Forms of aggregativity. In Donagan/Perovich Jr./Wedin, Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, 259—291.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 418
Number of citations: 0
