Interactive technologies during implementation of the olympic education into the student educational process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2021.07.01.009Keywords
interactive technologies, Olympic education, educational process, students.Abstract
Introduction Shift of priorities and social values in today's society leads to the need for constant improvement of educational process in higher education institutions. The experts note (Bystrova Yu.V., 2015; Gladush V.A. & Lysenko G.I., 2014; Naul R., Binder D., Ivanenko G., 2019) that the outdated practices prevail in today’s practical activity of higher educational specialized institutions, the ideas of democratization are not sufficiently implemented. The main problems in the development of higher education institutions are student low motivation to acquire knowledge and drop in attendance. This situation necessitates rethinking of the principles, functions and technologies of managing specialist training in Physical Culture and Sports and, thereupon, develops new approaches to the organization of the pedagogical process in a higher education institution. The analysis of special scientific and methodological literature indicates that today the ways of integration of the Olympic education into the school educational process have been extensively revealed (Armor K, Dagkas S., 2012), the educational potential of the Olympic movement has been elucidated (Bulatov M. & Platonov V., 2018), the importance of integrating Olympic education into the specialist training in Physical Culture and Sports (Radchenko LO, 2016), the activity peculiarities of the Olympic Studies Centers operating as part of the specialized higher education institutions of Ukraine (Zagitova & Radchenko, 2019) have been disclosed, whereas the problem of improving the educational process by integrating Olympic education into the educational process of higher education institutions remains a pressing scientific matter. Today’s educational requirements include the training of highly qualified specialists who are able to integrate the theoretical knowledge and practical skills acquired at a higher educational institution into an integral system effectively used in their professional activities. In order to successfully realize personal educational potential of future specialists in Physical Culture and Sports, the development conditions of the qualities such as criticism and non-standard thinking, the ability to produce new ideas and work in a team, etc., must be created. Such tasks are facilitated by the use of interactive learning technologies in the educational process. The working hypothesis is that the use of interactive learning technologies in the study of Olympic education related issues will improve the efficiency of student educational process in higher education institutions preparing future specialists in Physical Culture and Sports. Aim of the Study: to provide the rationale for the use of interactive learning technologies while implementing the Olympic education into the student educational process. Material and methods. Research participants: 12 experts – members of the Olympic Academy of Ukraine, having more than 15 years of pedagogic experience at higher educational institutions, holding managerial positions at sphere-specific educational establishments. 69 students from 8 study groups of the 4th year at the National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport, who major in 0.17 ‘Physical Education and Sport’. Organization of research. The first step was to determine experts’ opinion on the necessity to introduce Olympic education in the student training process. The next step of the study was to determine the educational process efficiency according to I.S. Todorova (Todorova I.S& Pavlenko V.I. 2011). This method employs that the respondents need to answer 20 questions that allow to determine the educational activity efficiency ratio, namely: total educational activity efficiency, motivational subsystem efficiency, operational subsystem efficiency, information subsystem efficiency, and regulatory subsystem efficiency. The level of educational activity efficiency is determined by the quality points earned after calculation. The study was conducted in two cohorts: the 1st cohort is students of the Coach Faculty, and the 2nd cohort is students of the Sport and Management Faculty. Two surveys were undertaken. The first survey was conducted before studying the Olympic Sports. The second one took place in the end of the educational course ‘Olympic Sports’. In this paper, such methods as the analysis of literary sources, synthesis and generalization were used to define interactive learning technologies, the use of which helps to enhance the integration of aspects of the Olympic education into the overall educational process. The application of those methods allowed to develop the content and guidelines for the use of the above-mentioned technologies. Statistical analysis. Statistical processing of the data was performed using the Excel 2010 spreadsheet editor (Microsoft, USA, 2010), the average was used. Results: the expediency of Olympic education implementation in the student educational process was studied; the interactive learning technologies that will facilitate the educational process efficiency among the Physical Culture and Sports future specialists were elucidated; the efficiency of the interactive learning technologies in the Olympic education implementation was disclosed. Conclusions: the interactive learning technologies that will felicitate the creation of a highly-qualified specialist in Physical Culture and Sports, namely: interactive cooperative learning technologies (pairwork, trio rotation, ‘Carousel’, ‘Aquarium’); group learning technologies (‘Brainstorming’, "Decision Tree’, ‘World Café’); situational modeling technologies (‘Six Hats Method’, business games); argument technologies (‘The PRESSING Method,’ ‘What? Where? When? How?’ debates, etc.); and methodological materials for the students of higher educational institutions of Ukraine were produced, based upon this technology data. The use of interactive learning technologies when integrating Olympic education permits to increase the educational process efficiency and helps to improve student motivation to acquire knowledge.References
Abykanova, B. (2016). The Use of Interactive Learning Technology in Institutions of Higher Learning. International journal of environmental &science education. 18:12528-39
Amemado, D. (2014). Integrating technologies in higher education: The issue of recommended educational features still making headline news. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning.29(1):15-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.908700
Armour K, Dagkas S. (2012). Olympism and education: a critical review. Educational Review.64(3):261-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.704742
Binder, D. (2017) Canada: Olympic education programmes as legacies of Olympic Games. In: Naul R, Binder D, Rychtecky A, Culpan I, editors. Olympic education: an international review. New York: Taylor & Francis. 104-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.676539
Bronikowski., M, Bronikowska, M., Glapa, A. (2017). Poland: Olympic education as patterns of sport instittutions. In: Naul R, Binder D, Rychtecky A, Culpan I, editors. Olympic education: an international review. New York: Taylor & Francis:222-37.
Bistrova, U. (2015) Innovative Methods of learning in the Higher School of Ukraine. Law and Innovation Society. 1(4):27-33.
Bulatova M., Georgiadis K. (2016). International Olympic Academy in the system of education and upbringing. Science in Olympic sports.3:4-13.
Bulatova, M., Platonov, V. (2018). Olympism and Olympic education: history, modernity, future. Science in Olympic sports. 4:4-27. https://doi.org/10.32652/olympic2018.4_1
Chilwant K.S. (2012).Comparsion of two teaching methods, structured interactive lectures and conventional lectures. Biomedical Research. 23(3):363-66.
Devine, C. (2013). London 2012 Olympic legacy: a big sporting society? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 5(2):257-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.656674
Georgiadis, K. (2005). The Olympic education program of the Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games Athens 2004 and the Greek Ministry of Education. In: IOA, editor. 45th Session for Young Participants; Olympia. 120-45.
Gladush, V., Lysenko, G. (2014). Higher education pedagogy: theory, practice, history. Dnypro, 416 p.
Haijun Zhang, Guo Xiatao, Zhang Shangyan. (2017).Research on the Reason of Olympic Internationalization Succes from the Cross-culture Perspective. Open Access Journal of Science. 1(6): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.15406/oajs.2017.01.00033
Horodynskyy S.I., Ibragimova L.S. (2017). Features introduction of Olympic education in the educational process in Ukraine. Young Scientist. 3.1(43.1): 99-2.
Ivanenko H. (2017). Problems of realization of the Olympic education Ukrainian universities and ways of overcoming them (view of students). Theory and methods of Physical Education and Sports.4:23-6.
Ivanenko, H. (2019). Olympic education in the system of preparation of specialists in the specialty "Physical Culture and Sports" in Ukraine. Prydniprovsky Sports Newsletter. 1:25-32. DOI: 10.32540/2071-1476-2019-1-025
Kozatek, A., Uzhvenko, K., Duchnova, L., Radchenko, L, Krol, I., Ulan, A., D’omina, A., Borysova, O., Denysova, L., Shi Shengying (2020). Sustainable development and the olympic movement. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES). 20 (1): 403-7. DOI:10.7752/jpes.2020.s1057
Lenskyj, H. (2012). Olympic education and Olympism: Still colonizing children’s minds. Educational Review. 64(3):265-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.667389
Lyras A. (2014). Olympic education in practice: educational components of a sport for peacebuilding intervention. In: Chatziefstathiou D, Muller N, editors. Olympism, Olympic education and learning legacies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge scholars Publishing: 245-58.
Minnaert, L. (2012). An Olympic legacy for all? The non-infrastructural outcomes of the Olympic Games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996-Beijing 2008). Tourism Management. 33(4):361-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.04.005
Muller, N., editor. (2000). Pier de Coubertin. Olimpism. Selected Writings. Lausanne: IOC: 281-283.
Naul, R., Binder, D., Rychtecky, A., & Culpon, I. (2017). Olympic Education: an internatsonal review. Discription: Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routbedge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa Busines, 361 p.
Radchenko M.A. (2014). Interactive learning technologies in the professional formation future specialist. Pedahohika formuvannya tvorchoyi osobystosti u vyshchiy i zahal’noosvitniy shkolakh.34:299-06.
Radchenko, L. (2016) Stages of realization of Olympic education in activity of higher profile educational institutions. Scientific journal of M.P. Dragomanov National Pedagogical University. 6 (76): 95-8.
Roux Charl J., Janse van Rensburg Natasha. (2017). An outdoor adventure programme infused with Olympic values in teaching Olympism to university students. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation.1-2: 63-77.
Raman Santhiram. (2016). Emerging Trends in Higher Education Pedagogy. WOU Press. 2:82.
Todt NS. (2014). Worldwide practices combining Olympic values and sport: encouraging transferable life skills to Disadvantaged Brazilian Communities. In: Chatziefstathiou D, Muller N, editors. Olympism, Olympic education and learning legacies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge scholars Publishing. 194-206.
Todorova I., Pavlenko V. Psykholohiia i pedahohika: navchalnyi posibnyk. K: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 2011.180-185.
Zagitova, M., Radchenko, L. (2019). Organizational bases of activity of the regional centers of Olympic researches and education in Ukraine. Science in Olympic sports. 1:4-9. doi:10.32652/olympic2019.1_1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 510
Number of citations: 0