Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Redistribution and the alleviation of income inequalities: the case of the European Union
  • Home
  • /
  • Redistribution and the alleviation of income inequalities: the case of the European Union
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020) /
  4. Articles

Redistribution and the alleviation of income inequalities: the case of the European Union

Authors

  • Małgorzata Szczepaniak Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-8430

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2020.011

Keywords

income inequalities, redistribution, social transfers

Abstract

Motivation: The income inequalities are considered an important economic and social problem, because increasing income inequalities may make it difficult to achieve such policy goals as: social cohesion and inclusive development. State’s interference through redistribution is aimed to decrease the differences between the rich and poor. Even though social transfers alleviate the income inequalities, the extent to which they decrease the gap between the rich and the poor is different in European Union (EU) countries. The answer to the question of redistribution effectiveness is extremely important from this perspective.

Aim: The article aims to present the diversity of EU countries from the perspective of income inequalities, social transfers (government expenditures on social protection, health and education) and finally redistribution. Its aim is also to assess the impact of social transfers on inequalities on the basis of dynamic panel data model.

Results: There is no significant relationship between the level of social transfers and Gini disposable income. However, the results of regression analysis proved that government expenditures on social protection significantly increase the difference between market and disposable income inequalities (Gini gap) and therefore more effectively decrease income inequalities.

References

Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3). doi:10.1007/s10888-010-9138-z.

Agnello, L., Castro, V., Jalles, J.T., & Sousa, R.M. (2017). Income inequality, fiscal stimuli and political (in)stability. International Tax Public Finance, 24(3). doi:10.1007/s10797-016-9428-x.

Atkinson, A. (1996). Seeking to explain the distribution of income. In J. Hills (Ed.), New inequalities: the changing distribution of income and wealth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511521935.002.

Bussolo, M., Krolage, C., Makovec, M., Peichl, A., Stockli, M., Torre, I., & Wittneben, C. (2018). Vertical and horizontal redistribution: the case of Western and Eastern Europe. Policy Research Working Papers, 275. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8657.

Causa, O., & Hermansen, M. (2017). Income redistribution through taxes and transfers across OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1453. doi:10.1787/bc7569c6-en.

Dorrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2014). The impact of redistributive policies on inequality in OECD countries. Applied Economics, 46(17). doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.892202.

Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2). doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002.

Eurostat. (2011). Manual on sources and methods for the compilation of COFOG statistics: classification of the functions of government (COFOG). doi:10.2785/16355.

Eurostat. (2019). Retrieved 10.01.2020 from https://ec.europa.eu.

Fuest, C., Niehues, J., & Peichl, A. (2010). The redistributive effects of tax benefit systems in the enlarged EU. Public Finance Review, 38(4). doi:10.1177/1091142110373480.

Jenkins, S.P., Brandolini, A., Micklewright, J., &Nolan, B. (2011). The great recession and the distribution of household income. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671021.001.0001.

Niehues, J. (2010). Social spending generosity and income inequality: a dynamic panel model approach. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 5178. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1724733.

OECD. (2012). Income inequality and growth: the role of taxes and transfers. OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, 9.

OECD. (2015). In it together: why less inequality benefits all? Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264235120-en.

OECD. (2019). Retrieved 10.01.2020 from https://www.oecd.org.

Osińska, M. (Ed.). (2007). Ekonometria współczesna. Torun: TNOiK.

Roed, K., & Strom, S. (2002). Progressive taxes and the labour market: Is the trade-off between equality and efficiency inevitable? Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(1). doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00160.

Sachs, J.P. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Lancet, 379(9832). doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60685-0.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2013). The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Szczepaniak, M. (2018). Nierówności dochodowe w wybranych krajach na tle systemów społeczno-gospodarczych. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 55(3). doi:10.15584/nsawg.2018.3.11.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

1.
SZCZEPANIAK, Małgorzata. Redistribution and the alleviation of income inequalities: the case of the European Union. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 31 March 2020. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 149-161. [Accessed 2 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2020.011.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 716
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop