Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Theoria et Historia Scientiarum

An attempt at a proxemic description of politeness from the ethological-evolutionary persepctive
  • Home
  • /
  • An attempt at a proxemic description of politeness from the ethological-evolutionary persepctive
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 9 (2012): Ways to protolanguage contemporary problems in the evolution of language /
  4. Articles

An attempt at a proxemic description of politeness from the ethological-evolutionary persepctive

Authors

  • Przemysław Żywiczyński Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/v10235-011-0005-2

Abstract

It should be admitted that the view on the development of linguistic politeness laid out in this article is couched in very hypothetical terms. To go beyond the postulative character of this proposal, it is necessary to further investigate politeness phenomena themselves as well as their relation to proxemic operations. First of all, the universality of sociofugal politeness should be demonstrated. Although there is some empirical evidence suggesting that the mechanisms of discourse dislocation, cognitive distancing, and personal distancing have a wide distribution across languages (see Żywiczyński 2010: 391–438), this thesis stands in want of a thorough verification, in particular with reference to an influence of socio-linguistic factors on the variability in the occurrence of particular strategies. Next, an exhaustive functional description of sociofugal politeness should be given. Here, the argument about its appeasing role was uniquely based on the study of dispreferred turns. Other studies indicate that in different contexts politeness serves the same purpose. For example, the accumulation of sociofugal strategies in an utterance seems to be proportional to the degree of imposition contained in it; hence, it can be concluded that an increased risk of an interaction taking an agonal course increases the intensity of appeasement displays.

References

Aitchison, J. (2000). The seeds of Speech. Language Origin and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1972). Eye Contact, Distance and Affiliation. In: J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in Face to Face Interaction (pp. 301-316). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C. & Wilcox, S. E. (1994). Signs of the origin of Syntax. Current Anthropology 35(4), 349-368.

Arndt, H. & Janney, R. (1985). Politeness Revisited: Cross-Modal Supportive Strategies. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23(4), 281-300.

Bailey, K. (1987). Human Paleopsychology. Applications to Aggression and Pathological Processes. London: Routledge.

Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1972). The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In: J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in Face to Face Interaction (pp. 103-127). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Brown, R. & Ford, M. (1972). Address in American English. In: J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in Face to Face Interaction (pp. 128-145). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Bühler. K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

Comrie, B. (1976). Linguistic Politeness Axes: Speaker-Addressee, Speaker-Reference, Speaker-Bystander. Pragmatics Microfiche, 1.7, A3-B1.

Corballis, M. (2002). Did Language Evolve from Manual Gestures? In: A. Wray (Ed.), The Transition to Language: studies in the evolution of Language (pp. 161-179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species. The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin Press.

DePaulo, B. (1991). Nonverbal Behavior and Self-Presentation: A Developmental Perspective. In: R. S. Feldman & B. Rimé (Eds.), Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 351-397). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dessalles, J.-L. (2007). Why We Talk: The Evolutionary Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Donald, M. (1999). Preconditions for the Evolution of Protolanguages. In: M. Corballis & S. Lea (Eds.), The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution (pp. 138-154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunbar, R. (1993). Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 681-735.

Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. London: Faber and Faber.

Dunbar, R., Marriott, A. & Duncan, N. (1997). Human Conversational Behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231-246.

Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.

Ehlich, K. (2005). On the Historicity of Politeness. In: R. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (pp. 71-107). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1989. Human Ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Fraser, B. & Nolen, W. (1981). The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 93-109.

Gärdenfors, P. (2003). How Homo Became Sapiens: On the Evolution of Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Doubleday.

Hall, E. (1969). The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Hediger, H. (1950). Wild Animals in Captivity. London: Butterworth.

Hediger, H. (1955). Studies of the Psychology and Behavior of Captive Animals in Zoos and Circuses. London: Butterworth.

Hewes, G. W. (1996). A history of the study of language origins and the gestural primacy hypothesis. In: A. Lock & C. Peters (Eds.), Handbook of human symbolic evolution (571-595). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A., & Ogino, T. (1986). Universals of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10(3), 347-371.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(86)90006-8]

Hurford, J. (2003). The Language Mosaic and its Evolution. In: M. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language Evolution (38-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jakobson, R. [1960] (1999). Linguistics and Poetics. In: A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The Discourse Reader, (48-54). London: Routledge.

Kirby, S. (2002). Learning, Bottlenecks and the Evolution of Recursive Syntax. In: T. Briscoe (Ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition (173-204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krebs, J. R. & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation. In: J. R. Krebs & R. Dawkins (Eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (2nd edition) (380-402). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kuno, S. (1973). The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness, or Minding Your P’s and Q’s. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper.

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. (2001). Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143-188.

Leech, G. (1983). The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MacNeilage, P. (2008). The Origin of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McNeill, D., Bertenthal, B., Cole, J., & Gallagher, S. (2005). Gesture-first, but no gestures? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 138-139.

Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Nijman, H. & Rector, G. (1999). Crowding and Aggression on Inpatient Psychiatric Wards. Psychiatr Serv, 50, 830-831.

Östman, Jan-Ola. (1989). Testing Iconicity: Sentence Structure and Politeness. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 4, 145-163.

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred and Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis (57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversations. Volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 7(4), 289-327.

Scheflen, A. (1972). The Significance of Posture in Communication Systems. In: J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in Face to Face Interaction (225-246). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Scott-Phillips, T. (2008). On the Correct Application of Animal Signalling Theory to Human Communication. In: A. Smith, K. Smith, & R. Ferrer-i-Cancho (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Evolution of Language, (275-282). London - Singapore: World Scientific.

Szwedek, A. (2004). Objectification in Metaphorical Processes - Some Philosophical Issues. Lingua Posnaniensis, 46, 121-129.

Turner, G. (1973). Stylistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Waal, F. de (1989). The Myth of a Simple Relation between Space and Aggression in Captive Primates. Zoo Biology, 8(s1), 141-148.

Watts, R. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wootton, A. (1981). The Management of Grantings and Rejections by Parents in Request Sequences. Semiotica 37(1/2), 59-90.

Żywiczyński, P. (2010). The Axiology of Spoken Interaction. An Essay on the Organisation of Conversational Behaviour. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersystetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

Theoria et Historia Scientiarum

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2012-12-19

How to Cite

1.
ŻYWICZYŃSKI, Przemysław. An attempt at a proxemic description of politeness from the ethological-evolutionary persepctive. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. Online. 19 December 2012. Vol. 9, pp. 71-98. [Accessed 29 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/v10235-011-0005-2.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 9 (2012): Ways to protolanguage contemporary problems in the evolution of language

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 445
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop