Normativity: the Hard Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2008.002Keywords
normativity, semantic behaviour, cognitive studies, semantics, John HaugelandAbstract
My goal in the present paper is to use Haugeland’s treatment as a springboard to explore a key problem for biological accounts of semantic properties, namely, how to capture the distinction between malfunction and misrepresentation. While Haugeland generates a complex taxonomy of species and subspecies of rules to support his arguments against the risks of identifying social propriety and objective correctness, he is rather more austere in his analysis of the naturalistic problem. I shall sketch a somewhat richer landscape, in which the space of error- by-misrepresentation (as opposed to malfunction) is itself split into twoReferences
Anscombe, Elisabeth (1957) Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Brandom, Robert (1994) Making it Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Chalmers, David (1996) The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dretske, Fred (1986) „Misrepresentation”, in R. J. Bogdan, (ed.), Belief: Form, Content and Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in S. P. Stich and T. A. Warfield (eds.), Mental Representation. A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 1994, pp. 157-173.
— 1988) Explaining Behavior. Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fodor. Jerry (1990) A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Frege, Gottlob (1918) „Der Gedanke”, Beitrdge zur Philosophic des deutschen Idealismus; translated by A. M. and Marcelle Quinton as „The Thought: a Logical Inquiry”, Mind, LXV (1956), pp. 289-311.
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (1994) „A Continuum of Semantic Optimism”, in S. Stich & T. Warfield (eds.) Mental Representation. A Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 259-277.
Haugeland, John (1998) „Truth and Rule-Following”, in J. Haugeland, Having Thought. Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 305-361.
Katz, Leo (1987), Bad Acts and Guilty Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McDowell, John (1998) „Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality”, Journal of Philosophy, XCV, 6 (June 1998), pp. 431-491.
Millikan, Ruth (1984) Language. Thought and Other Biological Categories. New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
— (1989) „In Defense of Proper Functions”, Philosophy of Science LVI, pp. 288. Neander, Karen (1991) „The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy LXIX, 4, pp. 454-468.
Papineau, David (1990) „Truth and Teleology”, in D. Knowles (ed.) Explanation and its Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-43.
Peacocke, Christopher (1990) „Content and Norms in a Natural World”, in E. Villanueva (ed.) Information, Semantics, and Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 57-76.
Pietroski, Paul (1992) „Intentionality and Teleological Error”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (1992), pp. 267-282.
Reznek, Lawrie (1997) Evil or III? Justifying the Insanity Defence. London and New York: Routledge.
Searle, John (1979) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, Charles (1995a) ‘The Importance of Herder’, in Ch. Taylor, Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 79-99.
Taylor, Charles (1995b) ‘Heidegger, Language, and Ecology’, in Ch. Taylor, Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 100-126.
Toribio, Josefa (1998) „Meaning and Other Non-Biological Categories”, Philosophical Papers (1998): 27 (2), pp. 129-150.
Walker, Nigel (1962) Crime and Insanity in England. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1962) Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 741
Number of citations: 0
