Ghost buster: The reality of one’s own body
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2003.007Keywords
proprioception, body representation, body schema, phantom limbs, aplasic patients, neonatesAbstract
What are the epistemic bases of the knowledge of the reality of our own body? Proprioception plays a primordial role in body representation and more particularly at the level of body schema. Without proprioception people can feel amputated and the mislocalization of proprioceptive information through the remapping of the Penfield Homonculus induces illusions of phantom limbs, illusions that contradictory visual feedback cannot erase. However, it turns out that it is not as simple as that and that vision also intervenes in body knowledge: vision of one’s own body allows deafferented patients to move and phantom limbs to disappear. Finally, the existence of phantom limbs in aplasic patients as well as studies on neonates provide evidence of an innate component of body representation.References
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1959. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, H. and Gerstenbrand, F. 1981. Phantom illusions in spinal cord lesions. In Siegfried J. and Zimmermann M. (eds). Phantom and stump pain, Springer-Verlag.
Bermudez, J. 1998. The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Block, N. 1983. Mental pictures and cognitive science. Philosophical Review, 92: 499-541.
Brugger, P., Kollias, S.S., Mtiri, P.M., Crelier, G., Hepp-Raymond, M.C., and Regard, M.2000. Beyond re-membering: Phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of USA, 23; 97 (11): 6167-72.
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., and Fazio, F. 1994. Mapping motor representations with PET. Nature, 371: 600-602.
Dretske, F. 1995. Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fourneret, P., and Jeannerod, M. 1998. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36 (11): 1133-1140.
Gallagher, S. 1995. Body schema and intentionality. In J.L. Bermudez, A. Marcel and N.Eilan (eds). The Body and the Self. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gallagher, S. and Cole, J. 1995. Body Schema and Body Image in a Deafferented Subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16: 369-390.
Gallagher, S. and Meltzoff, A.N. 1996. The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau- Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology, 9 (2): 211-233.
Gallagher, S., Butterworth, G.E., Lew, A., and Cole, J. 1998. Hand-mouth coordination, congenital absence of limb and evidence for innate body schemas. Brain and cognition, 38: 53-65.
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Giraux, P., Sirigu, A., Schneider, F. and Dubemard, J.M. 2001. Cortical reorganization in motor cortex after graft of both hands. Nature Neuroscience, 4 (17): 691-692.
Graziano, M.S.A. 1999: Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of USA, 96 (18): 10418-10421.
Lackner, J.R. 1988. Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain, 111: 281-297.
Levine, D.N., Calvanio, R., Rinn, W.E. 1991. The pathogenesis of anosognosia for hemiplegia. Neurology, 41(11): 1770-81.
Lotze, M., Flor, H., Grodd, W., Larbig, W., and Birbaumer, N. 2001. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain, 124: 2268-2277.
Meltzoff, A. and Moore, M.K. 1999. Persons and representation: why infant imitation is important for theories of human development. In J. Nadel and G. Butterworth (eds). Imitation in Infancy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9-35.
Melzack, R. 1990. Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends in neuro-science, 13 (3): 88-92.
Melzack, R. 1992. Phantom limbs. Scientific American, 4: 90-96.
Melzack, R., Israel, R., Lacroix, R., and Schultz, G. 1997. Phantom limbs in people with congenial limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain, 120: 1603-1620.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard Merzenich,
M.M., Nelson, R.J., Stryker, M.P., Cynader, M.S., Schoppmann, A., and Zook, J.M. 1984. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol, 224(4): 591-605.
Milner, D. and Goodale M.A. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Shaughnessy, B. 1995. Proprioception and the body image. In J.L. Bermudez, A. Marcel and N. Eilan (eds). The Body and the Self, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramachandran, V.S., and Rogers-Ramachandran, D. 1996. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 263: 377-386.
Ramachandran, V.S. and Blakeslee, S. 1998. Phantoms in the brain. London: Fourth estate.
Ramachandran, V.S. and Hirstein, W. 1998. The perception of phantom limbs. Brain, 121: 1603-1630.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. and Fogassi, L. 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3: 131-141.
Sirigu, A., Daprati, E., Pradat-Diehl, P, FranckN. and JeannerodM. (1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122 (10): 1867-1874.
Tye, M. 1995. Ten problems of consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Vuilleumier, P, Reverdin, A., and Landis, T. 1997. Four legs: illusory reduplication of the lower limbs after bilateral pariatal lobe damage. Archives of neurology, 54: 1543-1547.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 379
Number of citations: 0
