Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Theoria et Historia Scientiarum

How to Blend Concepts and Influence People: Computational Models of Conceptual Integration
  • Home
  • /
  • How to Blend Concepts and Influence People: Computational Models of Conceptual Integration
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 6 No. 1 (2002): Metaphor: A Multidisciplinary Approach /
  4. Articles

How to Blend Concepts and Influence People: Computational Models of Conceptual Integration

Authors

  • Tony Veale

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2002.016

Keywords

theory of conceptual integration, algorithmic model, computational models

Abstract

In this paper we explore the computational requirements of the theory of conceptual integration, and propose an algorithmic model that meets these requirements. Broadly speaking, we see three reasons for seeking a computational account of a powerful theory like conceptual integration. Firstly, consider that theoretical utility is inversely proportional to expressive power, and that overly powerful theories have little cognitive status, since scientifically, one should seek the least powerful theory that accounts for the most facts. It is important then that conceptual integration is shown not to be overly powerful. Similarly, a functional view of mind suggests that such a theory should be computationally tractable and not make infeasible processing demands. So just as cognitive theories should be falsifiable via empirical testing, such theories should also be shown to be tractable via computational modelling. This paper demonstrates the tractability of conceptual integration networks by showing how a tractable computational model, called Sapper, can accommodate the processes underlying conceptual integration.

References

Black, M. 1962. Models and Metaphor: studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Eco, U. 1995. Faith in fakes: travels in hyperreality. Translated from the Italian by William Weaver. London: Minerva.

Chamiak, E. 1983. Passing Markers: A Theory of Contextual Influence in Language Comprehension. Cognitive Soience 7, pp 171-190.

Collins, A. & E. F. Loftus. 1975. A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review 82, pp 407-428.

Culler, J. (1981 ). The Problem of Metaphor, in Language, Meaning and Style: Essays in Memory of Stephen Ullman. Leeds, UK: Leeds University Press.

Cunningham, P. & T. Veale. 1991. Organizational issues arising from the integration of the Concept Network and Lexicon in a Text Understanding System, in the Proceedings of the 12th Imernational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufman.

Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D„ & Dedre Gentner. 1989. The Structure-Mapping Engine. Artificial Intelligence, 41, pp 1-63.

Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD: Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401.

Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22:2. pp 133-187.

Forbus, Kenneth D. & D. Oblinger. 1990. Making SME Pragmatic and Greedy, in the Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

French, R. 1995. The Subtlety of Sameness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Garey, M. R. & D. S. Johnson. (1979). Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, New York.

Gentner, Dedre. 1983. Structure Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science 7:2. pp 155-170.

Hawking, S. 1975. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Communications in Maths Physics 87. pp 199-220.

Hendler, J. A. 1989. Marker Passing over Micro-Features: Toward a Hybrid Symbolic/ Connectionist Model, Cognitive Science 13:1.

Hofstadter, D. & M. Mitchell. 1988. Conceptual Slippage and Analogy-Making: A report on the CopyCat Project, in Proc, of the IOth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Montreal, Quebec.

Hofstadter, D. & M. Mitchell & the Fluid Analogy Research Group. 1995. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. NY: Basic Books.

Holyoak, K. J. & P. Thagard. 1989. Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction, Cognitive Science 13, pp 295-355.

Hummel, J. E. & K. J. Holyoak. 1996. LISA: A Computational Model of Analogical Inference and Schema Induction, in the Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hutton, J. 1982. Aristotle’s Pootics. NY: Norton.

Indurkhya, B. 1992. Metaphor and Cognition: Studies in Cognitive Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: The Netherlands.

Koestler, A. 1964. The Act of Creation. London: Picador.

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chigaco, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chigaco, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Quillian, M. R. 1968. Semantic Memory, in Semantic Information Processing, ed. Marvin Minsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. NY: Oxford University Press.

Veale, T. 1997. Creativity as Pastiche: A computational treatment of metaphoric blends, with special reference to cinematic “borrowing”, in the Proceedings of Mind II: Computational Models of Creative Cognition, Dublin, Ireland, September 1997. (available on-line at http://www.compapp.dcu.ie/~tonyv/Pastiche/Pastiche.html).

Veale, T. & Mark T. Keane. 1992. Conceptual Scaffolding: A spatially founded meaning representation for metaphor comprehension, Computational Intelligence 8:3.

Veale, T. & D. O’Donoghue & M. T. Keane. 1996. Computability as a Limiting Cognitive Constraint: Complexity Concerns in Metaphor Comprehension about which Cognitive Linguists Should be Aware. Cognitive Linguistics: Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues (forthcoming). John Benjamins.

Veale, T. & M. T. Keane. 1994. Belief Modelling, Intentionality and Perlocution in Metaphor Comprehension, in the Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Atlanta, Georgia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Veale, T. & M. T. Keane. 1997. The Competence of Sub-Optimal Structure Mapping on ‘Hard’ Analogies, to be pre.vented at IJCAI’97, the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya, Japan, August 1997.

Veale, T. & M. T. Keane. 1998. Principle Differences in Structure-Mapping, in the Proceedings of Advances in Analogical Research, eds. Keith Holyoak, Dedre Gentner and Boicho Kokinov. NBU.S’eries in Cognitive Science, Sofia 1998.

Winston, P. H. 1980. Learning and Reasoning by Analogy, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 23:12. 1980.

Theoria et Historia Scientiarum

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2007-01-02

How to Cite

1.
VEALE, Tony. How to Blend Concepts and Influence People: Computational Models of Conceptual Integration. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. Online. 2 January 2007. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 363-398. [Accessed 13 May 2025]. DOI 10.12775/ths.2002.016.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2002): Metaphor: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 403
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

theory of conceptual integration, algorithmic model, computational models
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop