Uses and Abuses of Cosmological Argumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.1993.005Keywords
cosmology, cosmological argumentation, God, theologyAbstract
In the present essay, after quoting two examples of abusing cosmology to support two opposite philosophical doctrines, I shall look for a methodological criterion which would allow one to defend cosmology against dangers of this kind. It is well known, for quite a time, that cosmology as a natural science is neutral with respect to philosophical or theological views. Unfortunately, however, this does not prevent scientists, philosophers, theologians, and many other outsiders from abusing cosmological argumentation. It is usually the so-called God-of-gaps theology which prepares a snare for too hasty a thinker.References
Popper K.R, Objective Knowledge, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1972, pp. 160—161; italicized by Popper.
Goldwirth D. S., T. Piran, Inflation — an Alternative to the Singular Big Bang, General Relativity and Gravitation 23, 1991,
Downloads
Published
2007-01-02
How to Cite
1.
HELLER, Michael. Uses and Abuses of Cosmological Argumentation. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. Online. 2 January 2007. Vol. 3, pp. 36-44. [Accessed 15 September 2024]. DOI 10.12775/ths.1993.005.
Issue
Section
Articles
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 318
Number of citations: 0