From the narrow to the broad. Multiple perspectives on language evolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths-2014-001Keywords
language evolution, evolution of language, faculty of language, FLN, FLB, biolinguistics, biosemioticsAbstract
Although many of the recent controversies in the field of language evolution research are empirical, the deepest divides seem to remain theoretical in nature. Specifically, defining language in incompatible ways has led to radically different views on language evolution as a programme, including evaluation of its current success and future progress. Despite recent manifestos from the “narrow” camp (Hauser et al. 2014; Bolhuis et al. 2014), who along the lines of Hauser, Chomsky and Fitch (2002) equates language with the syntactic processor, the rival approach seems to be gaining momentum. It embodies a move in exactly the opposite direction, by understanding language broadly and assuming an inclusive perspective on its origins, which results in ongoing expansion of the field of language evolution. New areas of academic reflection (such as normativity) are being brought to bear, new areas of linguistics are being included (such as pragmatics or linguistic politeness); and, interestingly, existing linguistic methods are now being used to inform animal communication studies.
References
Adornetti, I. and F. Ferretti. (2014) The pragmatic foundations of communication: an action-oriented model of the origin of language. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Arbib, M. A. (2006). Aphasia, apraxia and the evolution of the language-ready brain. Aphasiology 20: 1125–1155.
Atkinson, Q. D. (2011). Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332: 346–349.
Barceló-Coblijn, L. and A. Gomila. (2012). Campbell’s monkeys alarm calls are not morpheme-based. In Scott-Phillips, T., M. Tamariz, E. Cartmill, J. Hurford (eds.) The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference (EVOLANG 9). Singapore: World Scientific, 42-49.
Beckner, C., R. Blythe, J. Bybee, M.H. Christiansen, W. Croft, N.C. Ellis and T. Schoenemann. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Language Learning 59.1: 1-26.
Bickerton, D. (2014). Some Problems for Biolinguistics. Biolinguistics 8: 073–096.
Bolhuis, J. J., I. Tattersall, N. Chomsky and R.C. Berwick. (2014). How could language have evolved? PLoS biology 12.8: e1001934.
Botha, R. P. (2000). Discussing the evolution of the assorted beasts called language. Language and Communication 20.2: 149-160.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in relation to Sex. London: Murray.
Dediu, D. and S.C. Levinson. (2013). “On the antiquity of language: the reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences.” Frontiers in psychology 4: 1-17.
Dębska, A. (2014). Pointing in the right direction. A discussion of The Evolution of Social Communication in Primates, (eds.). M. Pina and N. Gontier. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Dor D., C. Knight and J. Lewis (eds.). (2014). The social origins of language.
Dunbar, R. I. M.,C. Gamble and J.A.J. Gowlett. (2014). (eds.) Lucy to Language: The Benchmark Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, N. (2013). Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. In T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365-387.
Fay, N., M. Arbib and S. Garrod. (2013). How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive science 37.7: 1356-1367.
Fitch, T., M. Hauser and N. Chomsky. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition 97.2: 179-210.
Gibson, K. R. and M. Tallerman. (2011). (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Hashimoto, T., N. Usui, M. Taira, I. Nose, T. Haji and S. Kojima. (2006). The neural mechanism associated with the processing of onomatopoeic sounds? NeuroImage 31: 1762-1770.
Hauser, M., N. Chomsky and T. Fitch. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
Hauser, M. D., C. Yang, R.C. Berwick, I. Tattersall, M.J. Ryan, J. Watumull, N. Chomsky and R.C. Lewontin. (2014). The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in psychology, vol. 5.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Igras, M., S. Kacprzak, M. Mąsior and M. Ziółko. (2014). The acoustic diversity in the phoneme inventories of the world’s languages. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Jackendoff, R. (2010). Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives, 63-72.
Johansson, S. (2012). The case for Neanderthal language – how strong is it?, [w:] T. Scott-Phillips, M. Tamariz, E. Cartmill and J. Hurford (red.), The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference (EVOLANG 9). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Kirby, S. (2013). The Evolution of Linguistic Replicators. In K. Smith and P.-M. Binder (eds.), The Language Phenomenon: Human Communication from Milliseconds to Millennia, 121-138. London: Springer.
Kirby, S. and J.R. Hurford. (2002). The Emergence of Linguistic Structure: An overview of the Iterated Learning Model. In A. Cangelosi and D. Parisi (eds.), Simulating the Evolution of Language. London: Springer.
Kirby, S., H. Cornish and K. Smith. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105.31: 10681-10686.
Lenti Boero, D. (2014). Sounds of protolanguages: Some preliminary insights from developmental psychology. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Lewontin, R. (1998). The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In D. Scarborough and S. Sternberg (eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Volume 4: Methods, models, and conceptual issues, 107-132. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Locke, J. L. (2006). Parental selection of vocal behavior. Crying, Cooing, Babbling, and the Evolution of Language. Human Nature 17.2: 155-168.
Mithen, S. (2005). The Singing Neanderthals: the origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Ouattara, K., A. Lemasson and K. Zuberbühler. (2009). Campbell’s monkeysuse affixation to alter call meaning. PloS One 4.11: e7808.
Parthemore, J. (2014). The case for protoconcepts: why concepts, language, and protolanguage all need protoconcepts. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Pina, M. And N. Gontier (eds.) (2014). The Evolution of Social Communication in Primates. Lisbon: Springer.
Pinker, S., Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: what's special about it? Cognition 95.2: 201-236.
Pleyer, M. and J. Winters. (2014). Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and Language Evolution Research. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Pokornowski, M. (2014). The fourth V, as in evolution: how evolutionary linguistics can contribute to data science. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Roebroeks, W. and P. Villa. (2011). On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. PNAS 108.13: 5209-5214.
Schlenker, P., E. Chemla, K. Arnold, A. Lemasson, K. Ouattara, S. Keenan, C. Stephan, R. Ryder and K. Zuberbühler [in press].”Monkey Semantics: Two 'Dialects' of Campbell's Monkey Alarm Calls.”
Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2014). Speaking Our Minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. Palgrave MacMillan.
Slocombe, K., B. Waller and K. Liebal. (2011). The language void: the need for multimodality in primate communication research, Animal Behaviour 81.5: 919-924.
Takahashi D., D.Z. Narayanan and A.A. Ghazanfar. (2013). Coupled oscillator dynamics of vocal turn-taking in monkeys. Current Biology 23.21: 2162-2168.
von Heiseler, T. N. (2014). How language and humans evolved – Introducing a new hypothesis. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Wacewicz, S. (2012). The narrow faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how is it defined? Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, vol. 9: 217-229.
Wacewicz, S. (2014). The shades of social. A discussion of The social origins of language, (eds.) Dor D., C. Knight and J. Lewis. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Wacewicz, S., P. Żywiczyński, L. McCrohon. (2014). „Linguistic politeness from an ethological perspective: Theoretical questions and empirical issues.” Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11.
Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 402
Number of citations: 0