Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Theoria et Historia Scientiarum

Motor Simulation and Ostensive-inferential communication: insights and clarifications
  • Home
  • /
  • Motor Simulation and Ostensive-inferential communication: insights and clarifications
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 19 (2022) /
  4. Articles

Motor Simulation and Ostensive-inferential communication: insights and clarifications

Authors

  • Angelo Delliponti Nicolaus Copernicus University https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3841-4173

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2022.002

Keywords

language acquisition, ostensive communication, motor simulation, intentions, mindreading

Abstract

In the article , a theoretical model of how motor simulation is a mechanism that underlies language acquisition is described. It is argued that motor areas might play a role in both the recognition of linguistic communicative and informative intentions in infants, by activating brain regions dedicated to speech processing. In this paper, I will extend the position taken there (i) by connecting my model to the features of infant-caregiver interaction in speech perception, (ii) by explaining the process that causes brains to create networks between speech areas and the motor cortex, and (iii) by showing how the most influential mindreading models can be made compatible with both the embodied simulation theory and with the cognitive abilities in children.

References

Antognini K., & Daum M. M. (2019). Toddlers show sensorimotor activity during auditory verb processing. Neuropsychologia, 126, 82–91.

Bermúdez, J. L. (2009). Mindreading in the animal kingdom. The Philosophy of Animal Minds, 145–164.

Borghi A., & Caruana F. (2016). Il cervello in azione. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, 28(5), 606–637.

Byom, L. J., & Mutlu, B. (2013). Theory of mind: Mechanisms, methods, and new directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 413.

Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy. Mind & Language, 28(2), 141–172. Carruthers, P. (2016). Two systems for mindreading? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7(1), 141–162.

Cook R., Bird G., Catmur C., Press C., & Heyes C. (2014). Mirror neurons: from origin to function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 177–192.

Cooper, R. P., Cook, R., Dickinson, A., & Heyes, C. M. (2013). Associative (not Hebbian) learning and the mirror neuron system. Neuroscience Letters, 540, 28–36.

Csibra G. (2007). Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account. In: P. Haggard, Y. Rosetti, & M. Kawato, Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition. Attention and Performance XII, 453–459. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Csibra, G. (2010). Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language, 25(2), 141–168.

Delliponti, A. D. (2022). Motor Simulation and Ostensive-Inferential Communication. AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej, 1, 1–20.

Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.

Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15(2), 399–402.

Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 213–218.

Fargier, R., Paulignan, Y., Boulenger, V., Monaghan, P., Reboul, A., & Nazir, T. A. (2012). Learning to associate novel words with motor actions: Language-induced motor activity following short training. Cortex, 48(7), 888–899.

Fernald, A. (1995). Human maternal vocalizations to infants as Biologically Relevant Signals: An Evolutionary Perspective. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, 391.

Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850.

Gallese, V. (2003). A neuroscientific grasp of concepts: from control to representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358, 1231–1240.

Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1480), 659–669.

Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.

Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds. New York: Oxford University Press.

Goldman, A. I., & Jordan, L. C. (2013). Mindreading by simulation: The roles of imagination and mirroring. Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Social Neuroscience, 448–466.

Goldman, A., & de Vignemont, F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 154–159.

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermueller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.

Heyes, C. (2010). Where do mirror neurons come from? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 575–583.

Hickok, G. (2009). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1229–1243.

Lombardo, M. V., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T., Wheelwright, S. J., Sadek, S. A., Suckling, J., MRC AIMS Consortium, & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1623–1635.

Lurz, R. W., Krachun, C., Mareno, M. C., & Hopkins, W. D. (2022). Do chimpanzees predict others’ behavior by simulating their beliefs. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 9(2), 153–175.

Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649–652.

McGuigan, F. J., & Dollins, A. B. (1989). Patterns of covert speech behavior and phonetic coding. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 24(1), 19–26.

Mikulan, E. P., Reynaldo L., & Ibanez A. (2014). Homuncular mirrors: misunderstanding causality in embodied cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–4.

Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258.

Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., Van Elk, M., & Bekkering, H. (2012). How learning to shake a rattle affects 8-month-old infants’ perception of the rattle’s sound: electrophysiological evidence for action-effect binding in infancy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 90–96.

Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying social learning in infancy: infants’ neural processing of the effects of others’ actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(7), 774–779.

Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12549.

Preissl, H., Pulvermuller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Evoked potentials distin-guish between nouns and verbs. Neuroscience Letters, 197, 81–83.

Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.

Pulvermuller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Preissl, H. (1999). Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: Evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 498–508.

Pulvermuller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 884–892.

Rakoczy, H. (2012). Do infants have a theory of mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 59–74.

Reggin, L. D., Muraki, E. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Development of abstract word knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 686478.

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the un-derstanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.

Salo, V. C., Ferrari, P. F., & Fox, N. A. (2019). The role of the motor system in action understand-ing and communication: Evidence from human infants and non- human primates. Developmental Psychobiology, 61(3), 390–401.

Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587–592.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Thompson, E. L., Bird, G., & Catmur, C. (2019a). Mirror neurons, action understanding and social interaction: implications for educational neuroscience. Conference Abstract: 4th International Conference on Educational Neuroscience.

Thompson, E. L., Bird, G., & Catmur, C. (2019b). Conceptualizing and testing action under-standing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 106–114.

Vatakis, A., Ghazanfar, A. A., & Spence, C. (2008). Facilitation of multisensory integration by the “unity effect” reveals that speech is special. Journal of Vision, 8(9), 14.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance theory. In: G. Ward, & L. Horn, Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell.

Theoria et Historia Scientiarum

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2023-12-27

How to Cite

1.
ANGELO DELLIPONTI. Motor Simulation and Ostensive-inferential communication: insights and clarifications. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. Online. 27 December 2023. Vol. 19, pp. 35-54. [Accessed 15 May 2025]. DOI 10.12775/ths.2022.002.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 19 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Angelo Delliponti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 256
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

language acquisition, ostensive communication, motor simulation, intentions, mindreading
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop