Text in psycholinguistics
Aspectual generalizations as well as language and psycho-accentuation dimensions of artistic text of distinguished Ukrainian writers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2021.001Keywords
text, apperception, understanding, background knowledge, presupposition, psycholinguistic accentuationAbstract
The article gives the insight into the notion of “text” via “prism” of linguistic and psycholinguistic parameters and presents its “broad” and “narrow” interpretation in humanities. It is pointed out that the linguistic parameters of the text include its in-tegrity, coherence, and boundary structuring, while psycholinguistic definitions focus on emotions and creativity of the sender and addressee. The psychological aspects and stages of text creation are analyzed with reference to knowledge of its background and linguistic presupposition. The contribution of Ukrainian and foreign studies to the development of the psycholinguistic foundations of the text are discussed on the basis of examples from Ukrainian literature. It is proved that the interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of the text is crucial for text study; the peculiarities of text creation are characterized through the opposition “generation – perception”, as well as through the expression of the linguistic personality of its ego in the text. The positive and negative impact of the text on the recipient is highlighted as well as it gives up-to-date interpretation of such notions as pathological text, apperception, understanding, interpretational variability of the text. The phenomenon of linguistic and psycho-accentuation is being analyzed on the basis of the texts of Ukrainian distinguished writers (P. Kulish, O. Kobylyanska, I. Ogienko, and others). The author characterizes the influence of linguistic and extralinguistic factors on increasing psycholinguistic accentuation.
References
Akіmova, N. (2012). Problema rozumіnnya tekstu v suchasnіy psikholіngvіstitsі. Naukovі zapiski Natsіonal’nogo unіversitetu «Ostroz’ka akademіya». Serіya: Fіlologіchna, vip. 30, 104–106.
Baley, S. (2002). Z psikhol’ogії tvorchosti Shevchenka. In: Baley S. Zіbr. tvorіv: v 5-ti tomakh, t. 1, L’vіv–Odesa, 174–210.
Belyanin, V. (2000). Osnovy psikholingvisticheskoy diagnostiki (Modeli mira v literature). Moskva.
Bіdyuk, O. (2007), Novіtnya metodologіya doslіdzhennya khudozhn’ogo tekstu: prikladnі aspekti psikhoanalіzu. Pitannya lіteraturoznavstva, vip. 74, 309–316.
Bigun, O. (2020), Taras Shevchenko’s Shristian cordocentrism: Khristiyans’kiy kordotsentrizm Tarasa Shevchenka. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 11(1), 241–250.
Bogdanova, І. Ye. (2002), Stilіstika khudozhn’ogo prostoru u tvorchostі kharkіvs’kikh poyetіv-romantikіv 20–40 rokіv ХІХ stolіttya: avtoref. dis. kand. fіlol. nauk. Kharkіv.
Dyachuk, N. (2016), Do problem doslіdzhennya khudozhn’ogo tekstu u psikholіngvіstitsі. Aktual’nі problemi fіlologії ta perekladoznavstva, vip. 10(1), 241–245.
Franko, І. (1898). Іz sekretіv poyetichnoї tvorchostі. <https://ukrclassic.com.ua/katalog/f/franko-ivan/1017-ivan-franko-iz-sekretiv-poetichnoji-tvorchosti> (30.06.2021).
Freyd, Z. (2002). Nekotor·yye tipy kharakterov iz psikhoanaliticheskoy praktiki. In: V. Leybin (ed.), Klassicheskiy psikhoanaliz i khudozhestvennaya literatura. Sankt-Peterburg.
From, E. (1994). Dzen-buddizm i psikhoanaliz. Chto takoye dzen?. L’vov–Kiyev.
Gal’perin, I. (1974), O ponyatii «tekst». Voprosy yazykoznaniya, № 6, 68–77.
Kim, L. (2010). Variativno-interpretatsionnoye funktsionirovaniye teksta: teoretiko-eksperimental’noye issledovaniye: avtoref. dokt. filol. nauk. Kemerovo.
Kosmeda, T. A. (2008). Retrospektsіya yak metodologіchna osnova doslіdzhennya «zhivogo» movlennya Іvana Franka. Movoznavstvo, № 6, 28–33.
Kosmeda, T. A. (2020). Retseptsiya statusa ukrainskogo yazyka v rossiyskom yazykoznanii: mif i real’nost’. Slavia Centralis, 13(1), 126–135.
Koval’ova, T. V. (1999). Leksiko-semantichnі polya kol’orativіv v ukraїns’kіy poyezії pochatku ХХ st.: avtoref. dis… kand. fіlol. nauk, Kharkіv.
Kuranova, S. (2017). Problemi doslіdzhennya movnoї osobistostі u psikholіngvіstitsі. Vіsnik Marіupol’s’kogo derzhavnogo gumanіtarnogo unіversitetu. Serіya «Fіlologіya», № 16, 90–97.
Leongard, K. (2000). Aktsentuirovann·yye lichnosti. Rostov-na-Donu.
Lіshchins’ka, N. (2016). Patogenniy tekst yak zasіb masovoї manіpulyatsії. In: Dokument u zberezhennі іndivіdual’noї / sotsіal’noї pam’yatі: Zbіrnik naukovikh prats’. (30.06.2021).
Mironova, T. (2013). Nezvichaynі movnі yavishcha v tekstі osobi, yaka progolosila smert’ avtora (іz dosvіdu komunіkativno-kognіtivnogo analіzu avtors’kikh yakostey origіnal’nogo tvoru M. Fuko «Vivre avec la Philosophie». Naukovі zapiski [Natsіonal’nogo unіversitetu Ostroz’ka akademіya]. Ser.: Fіlologіchna, 39, 182–186.
Lisichenko, L. (2002). Psikhologіchniy faktor u poyetichnomu movlennі. Ukraїns’ke movoznavstvo, t. 24. <http://www.essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream> (2.07.2021).
Ogієnko, І. (1918). Ukraїns’ka kul’tura: korotka іstorіya kul’turnogo zhittya ukraїns’kogo naroda. Kiїv.
Ovsіyenko, L. (2013). Tekst yak oB’єkt vivchennya psikholіngvіstiki. Teoretichna і didaktichna fіlologіya, vip. 15, 58–69.
Ovsyaniko-Kulikovskiy, D. (1895). Yazyk i iskusstvo. Sankt-Peterburg.
Papіsh, V. A. (2015a). Movnі resursi psikhologіchnogo zmіstu v povіstі O. Kobilyans’koї «Zemlya». In: Naukovі zapiski natsіonal’nogo unіversitetu «Ostroz’ka akademіya». Serіya «Fіlologіchna», vip. 53. Ostorog, 183–185.
Papіsh, V. A. (2015b). Viyavi nartsisizmu v povіstі O. Kobilyans’koї «Zemlya». Naukovі pratsі Kam’nets’-Podіl’s’kogo natsіonal’nogo unіversitetu іmenі Іvana Ogієnka. Fіlologіchnі nauki. KaM’yanets’-Podіl’s’kiy, vip. 38 (za materіalami VІ Mіzhnarodnoї naukovoї konferentsії «Mova, kul’tura і sotsіum u gumanіtarnіy paradigmі», Kamnets’-Podіl’s’kiy, 24–25 kvіtnya 2015), 271–274.
Papіsh, V. (2017). Nebesna aura «slovnoї» movi Іvana Ogієnka. In: Іvan Ogієnko і suchasna nauka ta osvіta. Serіya: Fіlologіchna, vip. 14, 265–270. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/IvanOgienko (2.07.2021).
Pіdmogil’niy, V. (1927). Іvan Levits’kiy-Nechuy (Sproba psikhoanalіzi tvorchosti). Zhittya y revolyutsіya, 295–303.
Potebnya, A. A. (1976). Estetika i poetika. Moskva.
Selіvanova, O. (2006). Suchasna lіngvіstika: termіnologіchna entsiklopediya. Poltava. Yarema, Ya. (2002). Dityachі perezhivannya і tvorchіst’ Shevchenka. Zі stanovishcha psikhoanalіzu. In: Ukraїns’ka lіteraturoznavcha dumka v Galichinі za 150 rokіv: v 2 t. t. 1, L’vіv: L’vіvs’kiy natsіonal’niy unіversitet іm. І. Franka, 176–185. Yermolenko, S., Bibik, S., Todor, O. (2001). Ukraїns’ka mova. Korotkiy tlumachniy slovnik
lіngvіstichnikh termіnіv. Kiїv.
Yung, K.-G. (1991). Arkhetip i simvol. Moskva., <https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4229>. Zagnіtko, A. O. (2012). Slovnik suchasnoї lіngvіstiki: ponyattya і termіni: U 4-okh tomakh, t. 1, 3, 4. Donets’k.
Zagnіtko, A., Mikhal’chenko, M. (2008). Osnovi psikholіngvіstiki. Donets’k.
Sources
Kobilyans’ka, O. (2022). Zemlya. <http://www.pedlib.ru/Books/3/0476/376-259.shtml> (30.06.2021).
Kulіsh, P. O. (1989). Tvori: U 2 tomakh, t. 2 (“Tsigan”, “Orisya”, “Pіvpіvnika”, “Gordovita para”, “Dіvoche sertse“, “Sіchovі gostі”, “Martin Gak”, “Tovkach”), Kiїv.
Mitropolit Іlarіon (1957). Rіdna mova. Stvorennya lyuds’koї movi. In: Fіlosofs’kі mіsterії. Tvori Vіnnіpeg, t. 1, 282–303.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 728
Number of citations: 0