Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • Język Polski
    • English
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Peer review process
    • Publication Ethics
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Committee
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • Język Polski
  • English

Studia Podlaskie

The Adaptive Strategies of Young Podlasie Residents in the Face of Secularization: An Analysis of Religiosity and Social Camouflage
  • Home
  • /
  • The Adaptive Strategies of Young Podlasie Residents in the Face of Secularization: An Analysis of Religiosity and Social Camouflage
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 33 No. 2 (2025) /
  4. Research articles

The Adaptive Strategies of Young Podlasie Residents in the Face of Secularization: An Analysis of Religiosity and Social Camouflage

Authors

  • Ewa Dąbrowska - Prokopowska University of Bialystok https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-365X
  • Michalina Trochimowicz Doctoral School of the University of Białystok https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0993-9084

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15290/sp.2025.33.02.08

Keywords

secularization, religion, camouflage strategy, Podlasie

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present an analysis of secularisation processes among young people with higher education living in the Podlaskie Voivode­ship. We also present the adaptation strategies used by them during their return to their hometowns. The research on which the analysis is based was carried out by means of individual semi-structured interviews containing ret­rospective questions with respondents aged 25 to 30, who come from villages and small towns of the Podlaskie Voivodeship. The study revealed two key phenomena: a significant weakening of religiosity in the majority of respond­ents at a young age and the use of camouflage strategies as a response to social expectations in their hometowns. It reveals the complex dynamics of changes in religious attitudes that begin as early as the middle school period (around age 14) and not, as one might assume, during the university period. The respondents use a camouflage strategy when returning to their home environment in order to avoid conflicts arising from differences in the world­view and from stigmatisation. The study reveals the complexity of adaptation strategies, particularly highlighting the conflict between individual beliefs and social expectations in the hometowns.

Author Biographies

Ewa Dąbrowska - Prokopowska, University of Bialystok

Doctor of Social Sciences, Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Sociology, University of Białystok. She works at the Cognitive Sociology Unit. Ewa Dąbrowska-Prokopowska developed her scientific experience during a year-long international grant project entitled “Religion, Ideology & Prosociality: Simulating Secularising Societies,” led by Prof. Konrad Talmont-Kamiński. Her research interests include interdisciplinary studies on secularization, transformations of contemporary Polish society, sociology of the Internet, social simulations, and complex systems theories.

Michalina Trochimowicz, Doctoral School of the University of Białystok

Master of Sociology, PhD student at the Doctoral School of the University of Białystok in the field of sociology. Michalina Trochimowicz is pursuing her doctoral studies under Prof. Konrad Talmont-Kamiński, during which she will examine the interactions between nationalism, religion, and magic. Her research interests focus on issues related to religious borderlands, magical thinking, and social change.

References


Printed sources and subject literaturę

Atran S., Norenzayan A. (2004), Religion’s Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion, “Behav Brain Sci”, no. 27(6), pp.713–30, DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x04000172.

Barwiński M. (2014), Pogranicze jako przedmiot badań geografii politycznej, “Polish Borderlands Studies”, vol. 2 (1), pp.46–48.

Berger P.L. (1967), The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, New York.

Bieńkowska M. (2019), Socjologia pogranicza – badania pogranicza w ujęciu białostockiego środowiska socjologicznego, “Nauka”, no. (3), pp. 73–86, DOI: 10.24425/nauka.2019.129245.

Bocchiaro P., Zamperini A. (2012), Conformity, Obedience, Disobedience: The Power of the Situation, [in:] Psychology – Selected Papers, G. Rossi (ed.), London, pp. 275-294.

Borowik I. (2008), O zróżnicowaniu katolików w Polsce, “Chrześcijaństwo – Świat – Polityka”, vol. 2(6), pp. 23–27.

Borowik I. (2016), Przemiany religijne w Polsce na tle transformacji w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej i globalizacji, [in:] Globalny i lokalny wymiar religii. Polska w kontekście europejskim, Borowik I., Górny A., Świątkiewicz W. (eds), Kraków, pp. 7–16.

Brighenti A.M., Castelli, A. (2016), Social Camouflage: Functions, Logic, Paradoxes. Distinktion, “Journal of Social Theory”, vol. 17(2), pp. 228–249 DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2016.1217552.

Bruce S., Voas D. (2023), Secularization Vindicated, “Religions”, vol. 14(3), p. 301, DOI: 10.3390/rel14030301.

Bukraba-Rylska I. (2008), Religijność ludowa – zjawisko i związane z nim kontrowersje, “Wieś i Rolnictwo”, no.1 (138), pp. 50–73, DOI: 10.53098/wir.2008.1.138/03.

CBOS, Religijność polskiej wsi (2014), https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2014/K_003_14.PDF [date of access: 10.11.2024].

CBOS, Religijność młodych na tle ogółu społeczeństwa (2021), https://www.cbos.pl/SPISkOM.POL/2021/k_144_21.PDF [date of access: 10.11.2024].

CBOS, Religijność Polaków w ostatnich dziesięcioleciach (2024), https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2024/K_050_24.PDF [date of access: 10.11.2024].

Chaves M. (1994), Secularization as declining religious authority, “Social Forces”, vol. 72(3), pp. 749–774.

Cox H. (2013), The Secular City, Princeton.

Coleman T.J. III, Hood R.W., Jr., Streib H. (2018), An Introduction to Atheism, Agnosticism, and Nonreligious Worldviews, “Psychology of Religion and Spirituality”, vol. 10(3), pp. 203–206, DOI: 10.1037/rel0000213.

Cook J., Hull L., Crane L., Mandy W. (2022), Camouflaging in Autism: A Systematic Review, “Clin Psychol Rev.”, no. 89(102080),. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102080, Epub 2021 Sep 6. PMID: 34563942.

Czyżewski M. (2013), Socjologia interpretatywna i metoda biograficzna: przemiana funkcji, antyesencjalistyczne wątpliwości oraz sprawa krytyki, “Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, vol. 9(4), pp. 14–27.

Deutsch M., Gerard H.B. (1955), A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment, “Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology”, no. 51, pp. 629–636.

Eberts M. (1998), The Roman Catholic Church and Democracy in Poland, “Europe Asia Studies”, vol. 50(5), pp. 817–842, DOI: 10.1080/09668139808412567.

Fereday J., Muir-Cochrane E. (2006), Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 5(1), pp. 80–92.

Fesmire C., Ven, T. V.,Wright L. (2019), The Social Camouflage and Everyday Masks of the Con-Style Serial Rapist: A Sociological Analysis of Newspaper Accounts, “Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology”, vol. 7(3), DOI: 10.21428/88de04a1.eb804223.

Flatt K.N. (2023), Secularization Theory’s Differentiation Problem: Revisiting the Historical Relationship between Differentiation and Religion, “Religions”, vol. 14(7), pp. 828, DOI: 10.3390/rel14070828.

Grabowska M. (2018), Bóg a sprawa polska. Poza granicami teorii sekularyzacji, Warszawa.

GUS, Ludność. Stan i struktura oraz ruch naturalny w przekroju terytorialnym w 2023 r. Stan w dniu 31 grudnia, 2023, https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-stan-i-struktura-ludnosci-oraz-ruch-naturalny-w-przekroju-terytorialnym-w-2023-r-stan-w-dniu-31-12,6,36.html [date of access: 10.11.2024].

Kusano K., Jami W.A. (2022), Selected Anomalies or Overlooked Variability? Modernization Is Associated with Secularization in Countries with High Historical Wealth but Is Associated with Increasing Religiosity in Post-communist or Christian-minority Countries, “Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology”, no. 3, pp. 1–17, DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100036.

Kvale S. (2013), Prowadzenie wywiadów, Warszawa.

Lotz J.B. (1992), Bóg we współczesnym świecie, Kraków.

Łuczewski M. (2008), Czarnowski zabłądził w Zaciszu, „Miesięcznik Znak” 3 (634) pp. 59–81

Marody M., Konieczna-Sałamatin J., Sawicka M., Mandes S., Kacprowicz K., Bulkowski G., Bartkowski J. (2019), Społeczeństwo na zakręcie. Zmiany postaw i wartości Polaków w latach 1990–2018, Warszawa.

Mesoudi A. (2011), Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences, Chicago

Molteni F. (2020), Religious Change among Cohorts in Eastern Europe: A Longitudinal Analysis of Religious Practice and Belief in Formerly Communist Countries, “Religion and Society in Central and Eastern Europe”, no. 10(1), pp. 35–53.

Mouzelis N. (2012), Modernity and the Secularization Debate, “Sociology”, vol. 46(2), pp. 207–223, DOI: 10.1177/0038038511428756.

Norenzayan A, Gervais W.M. (2013), The Origins of Religious Disbelief, “Trends Cogn Sci”, no. 17(1), pp. 20, DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006.

Norris P., Inglehart R. (2011), Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide, Cambridge, DOI: 10.1017/CbO9780511894862.

Pennycook G., Cheyne J.A., Seli P, Koehler D.J., Fugelsang J.A. (2012), Analytic Cognitive Style Predicts Religious and Paranormal Belief, “Cognition”, no. 123(3), pp. 335–46, DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003.

Paszkiewicz J. (1972), O Postawach Konformizmu I Nonkonformizmu, “ Etyka”, no. 10, pp. 119–36, DOI: 10.14394/etyka.257.

Pew Research Center (2018), https://www.pewforum.org/2018/06/13/the-age-gap-in-religion--around-the-world/ [date of access: 10.11.2024].

Poleszczuk J. (2004), Ewolucyjna teoria interakcji społecznych, Warszawa.

Predicting Religion: Christian, Secular and Alternative Futures (2003), Davie G., Heelas P., Woodhead L. (eds), Abingdon, DOI: 10.4324/9781315246161.

Puga-Gonzalez I., Voas D., Kiszkiel L., Bacon R.J., Wildman W.J., Talmont-Kaminski K., Shults F.L. (2022), Modeling Fuzzy Fidelity: Using Microsimulation to Explore Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Secularization, “Journal of Religion and Demography”, no. 9(1–2), pp. 111–137, DOI: 10.1163/2589742x-bja10012.

Renz R. (2022), Religia rzymskokatolicka w życiu społeczności lokalnej w okresie międzywojennym: (na przykładzie diecezji kieleckiej), “Perspektywy Kultury”, no. 36(1), pp. 185–208, DOI: 10.35765/pk.2022.3601.13.

Requena M., Stanek M. (2013), Secularization in Poland and Spain after the Democratic Transition: a Cohort A nalysis, ”International Sociology”, no. 28(1), pp. 84–101, DOI: 10.1177/0268580912466551.

Sadanowicz E. (2018), Podlaska wielokulturowość i związane z nią problemy językowe mniejszości narodowych, “Pogranicze. Studia Społeczne”, no. 32, pp. 98–110.

Sadowski A. (2020), Społeczeństwo wielokulturowe z perspektywy pogranicza, Kraków.

Schulz J., Beauchamp J.,Bahrami-Rad D., Henrich J. (2019), The Church, Intensive Kinship, and Global Sychological Variation, “Science”, no. 366 (707), 2019, pp. 1–12.

Smith J.M. (2011), Becoming an Atheist in America: Constructing Identity and Meaning from the Rejection of Theism, “Sociology of Religion”, no. 72(2), pp. 215–237.

Smith J.A. (1995), Semi Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, [in:] Rethinking Methods in Psychology, Smith J.A., Harre R., Van Langenhove L. (eds), Thousand Oaks, pp. 9–26.

Sommer H. (1996), Przewartościowanie religijne młodej inteligencji (na przykładzie studentów Rzeszowa), “Studia Socjologiczne”, no. 3(142), pp. 91–111, DOI: 10.15290/pss.2018.32.07.

Speed D., Coleman T.J., III, Langston J. (2018), What Do You Mean, “What Does It All M ean? Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning, “SAGE Open”, no. 8, DOI: 10.1177/2158244017754238.

Sumerau J.E., Cragun R.T. (2016), ‘I Think Some People Need Religion’: The Social Construction of Nonreligious Moral Identities, “Sociology of Religion”, no. 77(4), pp. 386–407.

Stolz J. (2020), Secularization Theories in the Twenty-first Century: Ideas, Eviden-ce, and Problems. Presidential Address, “Social Compass”, no. 67(2), pp. 282–308, DOI: 10.1177/0037768620917320.

Taves A., Asprem E., Ihm E. (2018), Psychology, Meaning Making, and the Study of Worldviews: Beyond Religion and Non-religion, “Psychology of Religion and Spirituality”, no. 10, pp. 207–217, DOI: 10.1037/rel0000201.

Tomasello M., Kruger A.C., Ratner H. (1993), Cultural Learning, “Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, no. 16(3), pp. 495–511, DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0003123X.

Trzebiatowska M. (2021), Presuming Religious Congruence? The Nonreligious and Catholicism in Poland, “Social Compass”, no. 68(4), pp. 653–670, DOI: 10.1177/0037768621994746.

Tyrała R. (2014), Bez Boga na co dzień. Socjologia ateizmu i niewiary, Kraków.

Weber E. (2018), Podlasie — gdzie religia spotyka magię, “Kultury Wschodniosłowiańskie – Oblicza i Dialog”, no. (4), pp. 209–215, DOI: 10.14746/kw.2014.4.18.

Williams Z.J. (2021), Commentary: The Construct Validity of ‘Camouflaging’ in Autism: Psychometric Considerations and Recommendations for Future Research - Reflection on Lai et al., “Child Psychol Psychiatry”, no. 63(1), pp. 118–121, DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13468.

Voas D. (2009), The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe, “European Sociological Review”, no. 25(2), pp. 155–168, DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcn044.

Voas D., Chaves, M. (2016), Is the United States a Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis?, “American Journal of Sociology”, no. 121(5), pp. 1517–1556,DOI: 10.1086/684202.

Zuckerman P. (2015), Faith No More: Why People Reject Religion, New York.

Studia Podlaskie

Downloads

  • PDF (Język Polski)

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

1.
DĄBROWSKA - PROKOPOWSKA, Ewa and TROCHIMOWICZ, Michalina. The Adaptive Strategies of Young Podlasie Residents in the Face of Secularization: An Analysis of Religiosity and Social Camouflage. Studia Podlaskie. Online. 31 December 2025. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 153-173. [Accessed 1 January 2026]. DOI 10.15290/sp.2025.33.02.08.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Research articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ewa Dąbrowska - Prokopowska, Michalina Trochimowicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 6
Number of citations: 0

User

User

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop