Wyzwania epistemiczne: o filozoficznym zaangażowaniu w badania kognitywistyczne
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2019.032Słowa kluczowe
wyzwania epistemiczne, nauki poznawcze, filozofia nauki, filozofia nauk poznawczych, interdyscyplinarnośćAbstrakt
W artykule pokazuję, jaką rolę może aktualnie odgrywać filozof w badaniach kognitywistycznych. Argumentuję za ważną, dotychczas nierozważaną, rolą filozofa nauk poznawczych w tychże naukach, w szczególności, za współpracą pomiędzy filozofami nauki a kognitywistami w pracy nad metodami badawczymi i podstawowymi założeniami teoretycznymi kognitywistyki, czyli nad tzw. problemami refleksyjnymi. Artykuł rozpoczynam od wskazania, jak filozof nauki, tu filozof nauk poznawczych może uczestniczyć w badaniach interdyscyplinarnych. Następnie omawiam przykłady problemów ważnych dla badań kognitywistycznych, w rozwiązywaniu których przydatne są kompetencje filozoficzne. Artykuł kończę wskazując na szeroką paletę problemów, przy rozwiązywaniu których możliwa i pożądana jest współpraca między filozofami i kognitywistami.
Bibliografia
Bechtel William. 1994. “Deciding on the Data: Epistemological Problems Surrounding Instruments and Research Techniques in Cell Biology”. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association:167–78. Philosophy of Science Association.
Bechtel William. 2010. “How Can Philosophy Be a True Cognitive Science Discipline?” Topics in Cognitive Science 2, no. 3: 357–66.
Bechtel William. 2012. Integrating Scientific Disciplines: Case Studies from the Life Sciences. Vol. 2. Springer Science & Business Media.
Bechtel William. 2004. “The Epistemology of Evidence in Cognitive Neuroscience.” Philosophy and the Life Sciences: A Reader.
Bechtel William, Robert S. Stufflebeam. 2001. “Epistemic Issues in Procuring Evidence about the Brain: The Importance of Research Instruments and Techniques.” Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader, 55–81.
Bickle John. 2018. “From Microscopes to Optogenetics: Ian Hacking Vindicated.” Philosophy of Science 85, no. 5: 1065–77.
Boden Margaret A. 1999. “What Is Interdisciplinarity.” Interdisciplinarity and the Organisation of Knowledge in Europe, 13–23.
Bogen James, James Woodward. 1988 . “Saving the Phenomena.” The Philosophical Review 97, no. 3: 303–52.
Borsboom Denny. 2013. “Theoretical Amnesia.” Open Science Collaboration Blog (blog); http://osc.centerforopenscience.org/category/misc6.html.
Brook Andrew. 2009. “Introduction: Philosophy in and Philosophy of Cognitive Science.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1, no. 2: 216–30.
Bzdok, Danilo, John PA Ioannidis. 2019. “Exploration, Inference, and Prediction in Neuroscience and Biomedicine.” Trends in Neurosciences.
Bzdok, Danilo, BT Thomas Yeo. 2017. “Inference in the Age of Big Data: Future Perspectives on Neuroscience.” Neuroimage 155: 549–64.
Carlson, Thomas, Erin Goddard, David M. Kaplan, Colin Klein, J. Brendan Ritchie. 2018. “Ghosts in Machine Learning for Cognitive Neuroscience: Moving from Data to Theory.” NeuroImage 180: 88–100.
Cohen-Cole Jamie. 2007. “Instituting the Science of Mind: Intellectual Economies and Disciplinary Exchange at Harvard’s Center for Cognitive Studies.” The British Journal for the History of Science 40, no. 4: 567–97.
Dennett Daniel C. 2009. “The Part of Cognitive Science That Is Philosophy.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1, no. 2: 231–36.
Derry Sharon J., Christian D. Schunn, Morton Ann Gernsbacher. 2014. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science. Psychology Press.
Duke Clifford S., John H. Porter. 2013. “The Ethics of Data Sharing and Reuse in Biology.” BioScience 63, no. 6: 483–89.
Eberhardt Frederick, David Danks. 2011. “Confirmation in the Cognitive Sciences: The Problematic Case of Bayesian Models.” Minds and Machines 21, no. 3: 389–410.
Egan Frances, Robert J. Matthews. 2006. “Doing Cognitive Neuroscience: A Third Way.” Synthese 153, no. 3: 377–91.
Epstein Susan L. 2005. “Making Interdisciplinary Collaboration Work”. In: Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science, edited by Sharon J. Derry, Christian D. Schunn, and Morton Ann Gernsbacher, 245–63. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Feest Uljana. 2017. “Phenomena and Objects of Research in the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences.” Philosophy of Science 84, no. 5 (2017): 1165–1176.
Feest Uljana. 2011. “Remembering (Short-Term) Memory: Oscillations of an Epistemic Thing.” Erkenntnis 75, no. 3: 391–411.
Feest Uljana. 2011. “What Exactly Is Stabilized When Phenomena Are Stabilized?” Synthese 182, no. 1: 57–71.
Floridi L., M. Taddeo. 2016. “What Is Data Ethics?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, no. 2083.
Frankish Keith, William Ramsey. 2012. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
Friedenberg Jay, Gordon Silverman. 2011. Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind. Sage.
Gigerenzer Gerd. 1991. “From Tools to Theories: A Heuristic of Discovery in Cognitive Psychology.” Psychological Review 98, no. 2: 254.
Gigerenzer Gerd. 2010. “Personal Reflections on Theory and Psychology.” Theory & Psychology 20, no. 6: 733–743.
Gigerenzer Gerd. 1998. “Surrogates for Theories.” Theory & Psychology 8, no. 2: 195–204.
Gilmore Rick O., Michele T. Diaz, Brad A. Wyble, Tal Yarkoni. 2017. “Progress toward Openness, Transparency, and Reproducibility in Cognitive Neuroscience.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1396, no. 1: 5–18.
Graff Harvey J. 2015. Undisciplining Knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century. JHU Press.
Grüne-Yanoff Till. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Success without Integration.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6, no. 3: 343–360.
Jolly Eshin, Luke J. Chang. “The Flatland Fallacy: Moving Beyond Low–Dimensional Thinking.” Topics in Cognitive Science, 2018.
Kaiser Marie I., Maria Kronfeldner, Robert Meunier. 2014. “Interdisciplinarity in Philosophy of Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 45, no. 1: 59–70.
Kaiser Marie. 2016. “Problems and Prospects of Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Philosophy of Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 41, no. 1: 61–70.
Kello Christopher T., Gordon DA Brown, Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho, John G. Holden, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen, Theo Rhodes, Guy C. Van Orden. 2010. “Scaling Laws in Cognitive Sciences.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14, no. 5: 223–232.
Klein Julie Thompson. 2010. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity 15: 15–30.
Kołodziejczyk Sebastian. 2014. “Po co filozofia kognitywistyce? Preteorie, metateorie i translacje”. In: Metodologiczne i teoretyczne problemy kognitywistyki. Ed. Jan Woleński, Andrzej Dąbrowski, 219–270. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2014.
Krakauer, John W., 2017. Asif A. Ghazanfar, Alex Gomez-Marin, Malcolm A. MacIver, and David Poeppel. “Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias.” Neuron 93, no. 3: 480–490.
Laplane Lucie, Paolo Mantovani, Ralph Adolphs, Hasok Chang, Alberto Mantovani, Margaret McFall-Ngai, Carlo Rovelli, Elliott Sober, Thomas Pradeu. 2019. “Opinion: Why Science Needs Philosophy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 10: 3948–3952.
Leonelli Sabina. 2016. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. University of Chicago Press.
Leonelli Sabina. 2016. “Locating Ethics in Data Science: Responsibility and Accountability in Global and Distributed Knowledge Production Systems.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, no. 2083: 20160122.
Leonelli Sabina. 2009. “On the Locality of Data and Claims about Phenomena.” Philosophy of Science 76, no. 5: 737–749.
Leonelli Sabina. 2015. “What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework.” Philosophy of Science 82, no. 5: 810–821.
Mäki Uskali. 2016. “Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity. What? Why? How?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6, no. 3: 327–342.
Miłkowski Marcin. 2016. “Unification Strategies in Cognitive Science.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 48, no. 1: 13–33.
Miłkowski Marcin, Witold M. Hensel, Mateusz Hohol. 2018. “Replicability or Reproducibility? On the Replication Crisis in Computational Neuroscience and Sharing Only Relevant Detail.” Journal of Computational Neuroscience 45, no. 3: 163–172.
Palminteri Stefano, Valentin Wyart, Etienne Koechlin. 2017. “The Importance of Falsification in Computational Cognitive Modeling.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21, no. 6: 425–433.
Peterson David. 2016. “The Baby Factory: Difficult Research Objects, Disciplinary Standards, and the Production of Statistical Significance.” Socius 2: 2378023115625071.
Peterson David. 2017. “The Depth of Fields: Managing Focus in the Epistemic Subcultures of Mind and Brain Science.” Social Studies of Science 47, no. 1: 53–74.
Riesch Hauke. 2014. “Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science: Interdisciplinary Relations and Complex Social Identities.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 48: 30–37.
Ritchie J. Brendan, David Michael Kaplan, Colin Klein. 2017. “Decoding the Brain: Neural Representation and the Limits of Multivariate Pattern Analysis in Cognitive Neuroscience.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Rosenberg Monica D., B. J. Casey, Avram J. Holmes. 2018. “Prediction Complements Explanation in Understanding the Developing Brain.” Nature Communications 9, no. 1: 589.
Schindler Samuel. 2011. “Bogen and Woodward’s Data-Phenomena Distinction, Forms of Theory-Ladenness, and the Reliability of Data.” Synthese 182, no. 1: 39–55.
Sullivan Jacqueline A. 2017. “Coordinated Pluralism as a Means to Facilitate Integrative Taxonomies of Cognition.” Philosophical Explorations 20, no. 2: 129–145.
Sullivan Jacqueline A. 2018. “Optogenetics, Pluralism, and Progress.” Philosophy of Science 85, no. 5: 1090–1101.
Sullivan Jacqueline A. 2014. “Stabilizing Mental Disorders: Prospects and Problems.” In: Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds, by Jacqueline A. Sullivan and Harold Kincaid, 257. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London,England: MIT Press.
Sullivan Jacqueline A. 2009. “The Multiplicity of Experimental Protocols: A Challenge to Reductionist and Non-Reductionist Models of the Unity of Neuroscience.” Synthese 167, no. 3: 511.
Thagard Paul. 2005. “Being Interdisciplinary: Trading Zones in Cognitive Science.” Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science, 317–339.
Thagard Paul. 2006. “How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44, no. S1: 177–196.
Van Gelder Tim. 1998. “The Roles of Philosophy in Cognitive Science.” Philosophical Psychology 11, no. 2: 117–136.
Wagenknecht Susan. 2016. A Social Epistemology of Research Groups. Springer.
Yarkoni Tal, Jacob Westfall. 2017. “Choosing Prediction over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons from Machine Learning.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 12, no. 6: 1100–1122.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 324
Liczba cytowań: 0