Problem of Social Responsibility of Laboratory Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2021.039Słowa kluczowe
social responsibility, laboratory sciences, theory, Ian Hacking, Imre LakatosAbstrakt
The classic approach to science is dominated by the belief that science is a form of cognitive activity that focuses on constructing theories to describe and explain the phenomena and processes found in the world. Due to the fulfilment of the criteria of intersubjective communicability and controllability, theories are considered to be objective products of research activity that do not bear social responsibility for their applications. In this paper, the issue of social responsibility of science is addressed both from the classic perspective and from the non-classic viewpoint represented by laboratory sciences, i.e. those sciences that are predominantly concerned with creating phenomena rather than discovering them. It is argued that whereas in the former case the problem of social responsibility of science does not provoke serious controversy, in the latter case such controversies do exist and, furthermore, they are justified.
Bibliografia
Amsterdamski Stefan. 1992. “Filozofia nauki i socjologia wiedzy”. In: Racjonalność współczesności, eds. Helena Kozakiewicz, Edmund Mokrzycki, Marek Siemek, 319–334. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Baird Davis. 2004. Thing Knowledge: Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bhaskar Roy. 2008. A Realistic Theory of Science. London–New York: Routledge.
Bińczyk Ewa. 2018. Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocentryzmu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Birnbacher Dieter. 1999. Odpowiedzialność za przyszłe pokolenia. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza.
Chakravartty Arjan. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giere Ronald N., Moffatt Barton. 2003. “Distributed Cognition: Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge”. Social Studies of Science 33/2: 301–310.
Hacking Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking Ian. 1991. “Experimentation and Scientific Realism”. In: The Philosophy of Science, eds. Richard Boyd et al., 247–260. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hacking Ian. 1992. “The Self-Vindication of Laboratory Sciences”. In: Science as Practice and Culture, ed. Andrew Pickering, 29–64. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Hacking Ian. 1996. “The Disunities of the Sciences”. In: The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Eds. Peter Galison, David Stump, 37–74. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hacking Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Cambridge Harvard University Press.
Hesse Mary. 1980. “Theory and Values in the Social Sciences”. In: Mary Hesse, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, 187–205. Brighton: The Harvester University Press.
Hoffmann Roald. 1995. The Same and Not the Same. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jodkowski Kazimierz. 1989. “Kontemplacyjny versus performacyjny model wiedzy a Feyerabendowska krytyka nauki (miejsce nauki w hierarchii wartości różnych tradycji i form życia)”. Studia Filozoficzne 287: 99–113.
Jonas Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knorr-Cetina Karin. 1983. “The Ethnographic Study of Scientific Work: Towards a Constructivism Interpretation of Science”. In: Science Observed: Perspectives on Social Study of Science, eds. Karin Knorr-Cetina, Mike Mulkay, 115–140. London: SAGE Publications.
Knorr-Cetina Karin. 1992. “The Couch, the Cathedral, and Laboratory: On Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science”. In: Science as Practice and Culture, ed. Andrew Pickering, 113–138. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Knorr-Cetina Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krimsky Sheldon. 2003. Science in Private Interest. Has the of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kuhn Thomas. 1970. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, second edition. In: Foundations of the Unity of Science. Toward an International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 2, eds. Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Charles Morris, 54–262. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn Thomas. 1977. “Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science”. In: Thomas Kuhn, The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 31–65. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakatos Imre. 1978. “The Social Responsibility of Science”. In: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, eds. John Worrall, Gregory Currie, 255–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latour Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Leplin Jarret (ed.). 1984. Scientific Realism. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.
Lorenz Konrad. 2009. “Kant’s Doctrine of the A Priori in the Light of Contemporary Biology”. In: Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Michael Ruse, 231–347. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nersessian Nancy. 2006. “The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory”. Organization Studies 27: 125–145.
Pickering Andrew. 1994. “After Representation. Science Studies in the Performative Idiom”. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 413–419.
Sady Wojciech. 2020. Struktura rewolucji relatywistycznej i kwantowej w fizyce. Kraków: Universitas.
Schummer Joachim. 1999. “W kierunku filozofii chemii”. In: Chemia w laboratorium myśli i działań, eds. Danuta Sobczyńska, Paweł Zeidler, 173–202. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe IF UAM.
Sikora Marek. 2019. “Nauka i technika w dobie globalizacji”. Filozofia Nauki 105: 121–138.
Sismondo Sergio. 1996. Science without Myth. On Constructions, Reality, and Social Knowledge. New York: State University of New York.
Zacher Lech. 2007. Transformacje społeczeństw. Od informacji do wiedzy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
Zeidler Paweł. 2011. “Miejsce filozofii chemii w filozofii przyrodoznawstwa”. In: Paweł Zeidler, Chemia w świetle filozofii. Studia z filozofii, metodologii i semiotyki chemii, 13–28. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe IF UAM.
Zeidler Paweł. 2013. Models and Metaphors as Research Tools in Science. Philosophical, Methodological and Semiotic Study of Science. Berlin–Münster–Wien–Zürich–London: LIT Verlag.
Zuboff Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books Ltd.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Marek Sikora
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 413
Liczba cytowań: 0