Improving Science Learning in Grade 8 through Ipsative Assessment: Insights from Action Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2026.29.68703Keywords
Ipsative Assessment, Formative Assessment, Science Learning, Student Engagement, Reflective PracticeAbstract
Introduction: This action research aimed to explore the use of ipsative assessment as a strategy to enhance students' science learning. Conducted at a private school in District Lower Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, the study employed a qualitative action research design, focusing on teacher observation and reflective practice. The study involved 25 Grade 8 students, with science as a core subject. Ipsative assessment was used, where students compared their current performance with their previous achievements rather than with peers.
Objective: The main objective was to investigate the impact of ipsative assessment on students' learning outcomes, including their awareness of progress, engagement, motivation, and response to feedback.
Material and Method: Data were collected through classroom observations, teacher reflective journals, students' written work, and informal reflection discussions. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns related to students' learning progress and engagement.
Results: The results indicated that ipsative assessment significantly increased students' awareness of their personal learning achievements. It also fostered greater participation in science classes. Feedback focused on improvement was positively received by students, enhancing their confidence and motivation. Reflective teaching practices enabled the teacher to identify learning gaps and adjust instructional strategies accordingly.
Conclusions: The research concluded that ipsative assessment is an effective formative tool that supports student-centered learning and improves science learning outcomes. The findings suggest that implementing ipsative assessment can enhance teaching quality and create a more engaging and motivating learning environment for students.
References
1. Osiesi MP. Educational evaluation: functions, essence and applications in primary schools’ teaching and learning. Society & Sustainability. 2020;2(2):1-9.
2. Clark I. Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review. 2012;24(2):205-49.
3. Zimmerman BJ. From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational psychologist. 2013;48(3):135-47.
4. Ullah S, Ullah A, Manirahari P. Understanding the Role of Madrassas in Pakistan’s Educational Landscape: A Data-Driven Perspective from Google Trends. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport. 2025;26:66269-.
5. Ismail SM, Rahul D, Patra I, Rezvani E. Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia. 2022;12(1):40.
6. Wu X-Y, Ng DTK, Chiu TK. Self-regulated learning with AI: A comparative analysis of General-Purpose and Task-Specific platforms. International Journal of Technology in Education. 2026;9(1):279-302.
7. Sharma GS. Assessment For Learning: AGPH Books| AG Publishing House; 2025.
8. Hanrahan M. The effect of learning environment factors on students’ motivation and learning. International journal of science education. 1998;20(6):737-53.
9. Ullah S, Ullah A, Zaib M. Assessing the Demand for Skill-based Education in Pakistan: Insights from Google Trends Data. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport. 2025;27:66462-.
10. Corcoran TB, Mosher FA, Rogat A. Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. 2009.
11. Crosby R. Using ipsative assessment to improve feedback quality and the student assessment experience in university computer science: Newcastle University; 2021.
12. Siregar T. Classroom action research-based learning innovations: Kemmis and McTaggart models. 2025.
13. Ullah S, Sikandar HM, Jihad A, Maaz M. AI in education, ChatGPT, and personalized learning: Measuring public attention in Pakistan through Google Trends. Culture, Education, and Future. 2025;3(3):391-404.
14. Nishizuka K. Significance and challenges of formative ipsative assessment in inquiry learning: a case study of writing activities in a “contemporary society” course in a Japanese high school. Sage Open. 2022;12(2):21582440221094599.
15. Lee I. Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian modern language review. 2007;64(1):199-213.
16. Schellekens LH, Bok HG, De Jong LH, Van der Schaaf MF, Kremer WD, Van der Vleuten CP. A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2021;71:101094.
17. Mulyana T, Kurniasih S, Ardianto D. Assessment for learning: changes in the role of assessment in learning. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research. 2021;2(5):580-9.
18. Kumar B. ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES AND OUTCOMES. Innovative Approaches to Multidisciplinary Exploration. 2025:33.
19. Alt D. Teachers’ practices in science learning environments and their use of formative and summative assessment tasks. Learning Environments Research. 2018;21(3):387-406.
20. Kotsis KT. Integrating inquiry-based learning in the new Greek primary science curriculum. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. 2024;5(6):63-71.
21. Haynes NM, Boudreaux MK, Gordon EW. A theory-informed and student-centered framework for comprehensive educational assessment. Handbook for Assessment in the Service of Learning. 2025;2.
22. Meškauskienė A, Guoba A. The impact of Assessment and Selfassessment methods of Learning achievements and Progress on adolescent self-esteem building. Pedagogika. 2016;124(4):160-71.
23. Nobutoshi M. Metacognition and reflective teaching: a Synergistic Approach to fostering critical thinking skills. Research and Advances in Education. 2023;2(9):1-14.
24. Fathi S. Opportunities and challenges of a concept-based approach in online education: a case study in secondary international education. 2024.
25. Hughes G. Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2011;36(3):353-67.
26. Namaziandost E, Behbahani HK, Naserpour A. Peer support in language learning: Mitigating anxiety, enhancing achievement, cultivating growth mindsets, and increasing enjoyment. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. 2024;7(2):296-313.
27. Ratnayake A, Bansal A, Wong N, Saseetharan T, Prompiengchai S, Jenne A, et al. All “wrapped” up in reflection: supporting metacognitive awareness to promote students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. 2024;25(1):e00103-23.
28. Krajcik JS, Czerniak CM. Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach: Routledge; 2018.
29. Capobianco BM, Feldman A. Promoting quality for teacher action research: Lessons learned from science teachers’ action research. Educational Action Research. 2006;14(4):497-512.
30. Correia CF, Harrison C. Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science & Technological Education. 2020;38(3):355-76.
31. Kukol A. Combination of Ipsative and Sociomaterial Assessment Methodologies within University-Level Science Education. Higher Education for the Future. 2024;11(2):220-34.
32. Majumdar A. Thematic analysis in qualitative research. Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis: IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2019. p. 197-220.
33. Limeri LB, Carter NT, Choe J, Harper HG, Martin HR, Benton A, et al. Growing a growth mindset: Characterizing how and why undergraduate students’ mindsets change. International Journal of STEM Education. 2020;7(1):35.
34. Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of personnel evaluation in education). 2009;21(1):5-31.
35. Abdullah MY, Bakar NRA, Mahbob MH. Student's participation in classroom: What motivates them to speak up? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;51:516-22.
36. Patterson K. A Qualitative Study About How Teacher Actions Increase Student Anxiety During High-stakes Testing: Northcentral University; 2019.
37. Wiliam D. What is assessment for learning? Studies in educational evaluation. 2011;37(1):3-14.
38. Narciss S, Sosnovsky S, Schnaubert L, Andrès E, Eichelmann A, Goguadze G, et al. Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education. 2014;71:56-76.
39. Sadler DR. Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35(6):727-43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sohaib Ullah, Xin Liu, Marwa Zaib
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 7
Number of citations: 0
