Comment on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 May 2015, III CZP 114/14
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPOS.2016.007Keywords
Nature protection, hunting law, liability for damage caused by huntingAbstract
The aim of this comment is the analysis of the judgement of the Supreme Court, in which the Court dealt with the issue of the liability of a hunting area leaseholder or manager or the State Treasury for so called damage caused by hunting. It has a significant and practical meaning for the aggrieved party. The Supreme Court dealt also with the interpretation of an agricultural field. The stand taken in the judgement should be accepted, however, not all the arguments of the Supreme Court are accurate.Downloads
Published
2016-04-15
How to Cite
1.
RAKOCZY, Bartosz. Comment on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 May 2015, III CZP 114/14. Environmental Law Review. Online. 15 April 2016. No. 1, pp. 157-167. [Accessed 22 July 2024]. DOI 10.12775/PPOS.2016.007.
Issue
Section
Case Law, Reviews and Bibliography
License
The journal offers the access to its contents in Open Access system on the principles of non-exclusive licence Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0).Stats
Number of views and downloads: 368
Number of citations: 0