Comment on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 24 June 2014, I CSK 477/13
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPOS.2015.043Keywords
Damage caused by protected animals, liability, tenant’s claim against the State TreasuryAbstract
The aim of the comment is to analyse article 126 of the Nature Conservation Act of 2004 concerning the possibility of suing the State Treasury for a damage caused by protected animals to a real property. In its judgement the Supreme Court confirmed that not only the owner but also the tenant of a real property has legal standing in case of such a damage. The Supreme Court’s opinion merits an approval.Downloads
Published
2015-12-17
How to Cite
1.
DREWEK, Marcin. Comment on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 24 June 2014, I CSK 477/13. Environmental Law Review. Online. 17 December 2015. No. 4, pp. 129-137. [Accessed 22 July 2024]. DOI 10.12775/PPOS.2015.043.
Issue
Section
Case Law, Reviews and Bibliography
License
The journal offers the access to its contents in Open Access system on the principles of non-exclusive licence Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0).Stats
Number of views and downloads: 485
Number of citations: 0