Comment on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 24 June 2014, I CSK 477/13

Authors

  • Marcin Drewek Magister prawa, asystent w Katedrze Prawa Cywilnego i Bankowego Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/PPOS.2015.043

Keywords

Damage caused by protected animals, liability, tenant’s claim against the State Treasury

Abstract

The aim of the comment is to analyse article 126 of the Nature Conservation Act of 2004 concerning the possibility of suing the State Treasury for a damage caused by protected animals to a real property. In its judgement the Supreme Court confirmed that not only the owner but also the tenant of a real property has legal standing in case of such a damage. The Supreme Court’s opinion merits an approval.
Environmental Law Review

Downloads

Published

2015-12-17

How to Cite

1.
DREWEK, Marcin. Comment on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 24 June 2014, I CSK 477/13. Environmental Law Review. Online. 17 December 2015. No. 4, pp. 129-137. [Accessed 1 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/PPOS.2015.043.

Issue

No. 4 (2015): Przegląd Prawa Ochrony Środowiska

Section

Case Law, Reviews and Bibliography

License

The journal offers the access to its contents in Open Access system on the principles of non-exclusive licence Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 3.0).

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 642
Number of citations: 0