Leśniewski-quantifiers and modal arguments in legal discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.1998.007Abstrakt
Following an idea first proposed by Jerzy Wroblewski, this paper examines the usefulness of formal logic for comparative legal analysis. Subject of the comparison are the doctrines of mistake and attempt in German and English criminal law. These doctrines are distinguished by the interaction of deontic, epistemic and alethic modalities. I propose a purely extensional logic which is based on Leśniewski’s substitutional interpretation of quantification to analyse differences in the logical structure of the various criminal law doctrines.Bibliografia
Barcan-Marcus, R., 1972, “Quantification and ontology”, Nous, 240–249.
Binding, K., 1918, Die Normen und ihre Übertretung, Halle.
Blau, U., 1993, Die Logik der Intentionalen Prädikate, Mss. München.
Canty, J., 1970, “Substitutional quantification and Leśniewski quantifiers, Studia Logica, 165–182.
Cresswell, M., 1980, “Quotational theories of propositional attitudes”, J. Phil. Log., 17–140.
Dolling, E., 1995, “Real objects and existence”, in: The Heritage of Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz, Vito Sinsi (ed.), Amsterdam.
Duff, A., 1995, “Attempted homicide”, Legal Theory 1, 149–178.
Dunn, S., and N. D. Belnap, 1968, “The substitutional interpretation of quantifiers”, Nous 2, 177–185.
Geppert, K., 1992, “Zum ‘error in persona vel objekto’ und zur ‘aberratio ictus’, insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der neuen ‘Rose-Rosahl-Entscheidung’ ”, Jura, p. 163.
Kotarbiński, T., 1966, Gnosiology (transl. Wojtasiewicz), New York.
Haack, S., 1974, “Mentioning expressions”, Logique et Analyse, 277–294.
Kielkopf, Ch., 1977, “Quantifiers in ontology”, Studia Logica, 300–307.
Küng, G., 1977, “The meaning of the quantifiers in the logic of Leśniewski”, Studia Logica, 309–322.
Leśniewski, S., 1929, “Grundzüge eines neuen Systems der Grundlagen der Mathematik”, Fundamenta Mathematica 14, 1–18.
Lakatos, I., 1974, “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes” in: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Musgrave (ed.), Cambridge.
Linsky, L., 1972, “Two concepts of quantification”, Nous, 224–238.
Lycan, W., 1979, “Does quotation sometimes permit substitution?”, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic, 279–280.
Prittwitz, C., 1983, “Zur Diskrepanz zwischen Tatgeschehen und Tätervorstellung”, Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht, p. 110.
Quine, W.V.O., 1956, “Quantifiers and propositional attitudes”, Journal of Philosophy, 177–206.
Schäfer, B., 1993, Intensional Argumentation im Vertragsrecht, MA diss., München.
Simons, P., 1982, “On understanding Leśniewski”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 165–191.
Srzednicki, J., and V. F. Rickey (eds.), 1984, Leśniewski’s Systems. Ontology and Mereology, The Hague, Boston, Lancaster and Wrocław.
Wojciechowski, E., 1994, “Zwischen der Syllogistk und den Systemen von Leśniewski: Eine Rekonstruktion der Quantifizierung der Praedikate”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 165–200.
Williams, G., 1978, Textbook of Criminal Law, London.
Wray, D., “Logic in quotes”, 1987, J. Phil Logic, p. 77–110.
Wróblewski, J., 1983, Meaning and Truth in Judicial Decision, Helsinki.
Wróblewski, J., 1974, “Metodologiczne zagadnienia porownywania systemow prawa”, Państwo i Prawo.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 454
Liczba cytowań: 0
