Counterparts as Near-Equals

Bruno Dinis; Bruno Jacinto

doi:10.12775/LLP.2025.003

Autor

Bruno Dinis Departamento de Matemática, Centro de Investigação em Matemática e Aplicações – CIMA Universidade de Évora,, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-3289
Bruno Jacinto Departamento de História e Filosofia das Ciências, Faculdade de Ciências LanCog, Centro de Filosofia Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-544X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2025.003

Słowa kluczowe

Ship of Theseus, nonstandard primitivism, near-equality

Abstrakt

This paper offers an account of the ship of Theseus paradox along the lines of the so-called nonstandard primitivism about vagueness. This account is inspired by a model of the ship of Theseus paradox offered by Dinis that considers near-equality, in the context of Nonstandard Analysis, as the proper way to model the `same as' relation. The output is a class of models which unifies the semantic account of vague gradable adjectives recently proposed by Dinis and Jacinto with that of the `'same as' relation. It does so by taking both paradoxes to arise from a confusion between relations of marginal difference between vague degrees and ``"small'' precise relations between the things that have those degrees.

Bibliografia

Dinis, B., 2023, “Equality and near-equality in a nonstandard world”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 32(1): 105–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.018

Dinis, B., and B. Jacinto, “Marginality scales for gradable adjectives”, Submitted.

Dinis, B., and B. Jacinto, 2025, “A theory of marginal and large difference”, Erkenntnis, 90: 517–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00709-z

Dinis, B., and I. van den Berg, 2019, Neutrices and External Numbers: A Flexible Number System, with a foreword by Claude Lobry, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429291456

Fara, D. G., 2000, “Shifting sands”, Philosophical Topics, 28(1): 45–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20002816

Fara, D. G., 2008, “Relative-sameness counterpart theory”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(2): 167–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020308080155

Fara, D. G., 2012, “Possibility relative to a sortal”, page 1 in K. Bennett and D. W. Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 7, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/acprof:oso/9780199659081.003.0001

Nelson, E., 1987, Radically Elementary Probability Theory, Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 117, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.

Rosch, E., and C. B. Mervis, 1975, “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories”, Cognitive Psychology, 7(4): 573–605. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028575900249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9