Copredication, Davidson and Logical Form
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2023.013Słowa kluczowe
polysemy, ambiguity, copredication, logical formAbstrakt
This paper offers a novel account of polysemous copredicative sentences. The solution, which it is argued enjoys a number of advantages over the alternative accounts currently on the market, is inspired by Donald Davidson’s first attempt to deal with ambiguity. Specifically, the account involves mapping ambiguities in the object language (in this case polysemous singular terms) onto ambiguities in the metalanguage. If this account is coherent and superior to its rivals, it tells us something important about logical form: the value of logical form does not lie in the elimination all lexical ambiguity.
Bibliografia
Arapinis, A., and L. Vieu, 2015, “A plea for complex categories in ontologies”, Applied Ontology, 10: 285–296. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/AO-150156
Asher, N., 2011, Lexical Meaning in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793936
Chomsky, N., 2000, New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937
Cohen, L. J., 1985, “A problem about ambiguity in truth-theoretical semantics”, Analysis, 45 (3): 129-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/45.3.129
Collins, J., 2017, “The copredication argument”, Inquiry, 60 (7): 675–702. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1321500
Davidson, D., 1967, “Truth and meaning”, Synthese, 17: 304–323. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00485035
Dummett, M., 1996, “Does quantification involve identity?”, pages 308–326 in The Seas of Language, Oxford University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198236212.003.0013
Geach, P., 1980, Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories, Cornell University Press.
Gotham, M., 2017, “Composing criteria of individuation in copredication”, Journal of Semantics, 34 (2): 333–371. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffw008
Gotham, M., 2022, “Property inheritance, deferred reference and copredication”, Journal of Semantics, 39 (1): 87–116. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab020
Lepore, E., and K. Ludwig, 2005, Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liebesman, D., and O. Magidor, 2017, “Copredication and property inheritance”, Philosophical Issues, 27 (1): 131–166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phis.12104
Liebesman, D., and O. Magidor, 2018, “Meaning transfer revisited”, Philosophical Perspectives, 32 (1): 254–297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12120
Luo, Z., 2012, “Formal semantics in modern type theories with coercive subtyping”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 35 (6): 491–513. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9126-4
Ortega-Andres, M., 2022, “The denotation of copredicative nouns”, Erkenntnis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00493-8
Ortega-Andrés, M., and Vicente, A., 2019, “Polysemy and co-predication”, Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4 (1): 1–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.564
Pustejovsky, J., 1995, The Generative Lexicon, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001
Vicente, A., 2021a, “Chomskyan arguments against truth-conditional semantics based on variability and copredication”, Erkenntnis, 86: 919–940. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00138-x
Vicente, A., 2021b, “Approaches to co-predication: Inherent polysemy and metaphysical relations”, Journal of Pragmatics, 182: 348–357. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.007
Viebahn, E., 2022, “Copredication, polysemy and context-sensitivity”, Inquiry, 65 (8): 1066–1082. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1822911
Viebahn, E., and B. Vetter, 2016, “How many meanings for ‘may’? The case for modal polysemy”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 16 (10): 1–26.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Daniel Molto
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 562
Liczba cytowań: 0