Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Online First Articles
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • Peer Review Process
    • Logic and Logical Philosophy Committee
    • Open Access Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Logic and Logical Philosophy

Intuitionistic Logic from a Metainferential Perspective
  • Home
  • /
  • Intuitionistic Logic from a Metainferential Perspective
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Online First Articles /
  4. Articles

Intuitionistic Logic from a Metainferential Perspective

Authors

  • Miguel Álvarez Lisboa Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, SADAF-CONICET, Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-4650

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2025.006

Keywords

Buenos Aires Plan, metainferential logics, intuitionism, proof-theory, substructurality

Abstract

This paper introduces a metainferential version of intuitionistic logic. I work on the framework proposed by some logicians of Buenos Aires, who defend that a logic should be defined in terms of inferences and metainferences of growing complexity. Three logical systems are presented and proved to be adequate from an intuitionistic point of view

References

Barrio, E. A., and F. Pailos, 2022, “Validities, antivalidities and contingencies: a multi-standard approach”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 51: 75–98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09610-y

Barrio, E. A., F. Pailos and D. Tajer, 2015, “The logics of strict-tolerant logic”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 44(5): 551–571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-014-9342-6

Barrio E. A., F. Pailos and D. Szmuc, 2018, “What is a paraconsistent logic?”, in W. Carnielli and J. Malinowski (eds.), Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency, Trends in Logic (Studia Logica Library, vol. 47), Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98797-2_5

Barrio, E. A., F. Pailos and D. Szmuc, 2020, “A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 49: 93–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09513-z

Barrio, E. A., F. Pailos, F. and J. Toranzo Calderón, 2021, “Anti-exceptionalism, truth and the BA-plan”, Synthese, 199: 12561–12586. DOI: https://doi.org/s11229-021-03343-w

Cobreros, P., E. La Rosa and L. Tranchini, 2021, “(I can’t get no) antisatisfaction”, Synthese, 198: 8251–8265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02570-x

Ferguson, T. M., and E. Ramírez-Cámara, 2021, “Deep ST”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 51(6): 1261–1293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09630-8

Fiore, C., F. Pailos and M. Rubin, 2023, “Inferential constants”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 52(3): 767–796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09687-z

Gentzen, G., 1969 (1935), “Investigations into logical deduction”, pages 68–131 in M. E. Szabo (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, London: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Kashima, R., 2017, “On second order propositional intuitionistic logics”, pages 181–196 in S. Chin-Mu Yang, K. Y. Lee and H. Ono (eds.), Philosophical Logic: Current Trends in Asia, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6355-8_9

Martin-Löf, P., 1987, “Truth of a proposition, evidence of a judgement, validity of a proof”, Synthese, 73(3): 407–420.

Pailos, F., 2019, “A family of metainferential logics”, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 29(1): 97–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1534486

Pailos, F., and B. Da Ré, 2023, Metainferential Logics, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1534486

Paoli, F., 2007, “Implicational paradoxes and the meaning of logical constants”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85(4):553–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400701728574

Posy, C., 2020, Mathematical Intuitionism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674485

Ripley, D., 2021, “One step is enough”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 51: 1233–1259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09615-7

Scambler, C., 2020, “Transfinite Meta-Inferences”, Journal Philosophical Logic, 49(6): 1079–1089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-020-09548-7

Teijeiro, P., 2021, “Strength and Stability”, Análisis Filosófico, 41(2): 337–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2021.459

Troelstra, A. S. and H. Schwichthenberg, 2000, Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Dalen, D., 2004, “Kolmogorov and Brouwer on constructive implication and the ex falso rule”, Russian Mathematical Surveys, 59(2): 247–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10-1070/RM2004v059n02ABEH000717

Zdanowski, K., 2009, “On second order intuitionistic propositional logic without a universal quantifier”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 74(1): 157–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1231082306

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2025-03-26

How to Cite

1.
ÁLVAREZ LISBOA, Miguel. Intuitionistic Logic from a Metainferential Perspective. Logic and Logical Philosophy. Online. 26 March 2025. pp. 1-33. [Accessed 10 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/LLP.2025.006.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Online First Articles

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Miguel Álvarez Lisboa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 843
Number of citations: 0

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Buenos Aires Plan, metainferential logics, intuitionism, proof-theory, substructurality
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop