EXPLORING MEANINGFULNES IN WORK: WHY SENSITIVITY MATTERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2015.018Keywords
meaningfulness in work, meaningfulness sensitivity in work, positive management, job craftingAbstract
Research purpose: The proposed qualitative research study seeks to answer the research question, “How best to define meaningfulness sensitivity in work?” Job design adaptation, which forms a foundation for finding meaningfulness in work, is a motivator that results in happier and more productive employees. Yet, not all employees find meaningfulness in work.
Originality/value: This research is important and original because, in defining a new construct, companies can help meaningfulness-sensitive staff to design their jobs for maximum satisfaction and productivity while helping less sensitive staff to develop a more personal value in their work. In addition, this proposed research might provide insight into ways to address negative employee outcomes such as cynicism and high attrition. Methodology/approach: Researchers plan to use focus groups and interviews to collect data. Using an approach guided by the principles of grounded theory, data analysis will use several rounds of coding to define and develop the meaningfulness sensitivity construct, hopefully, identifying antecedents and personal characteristics of sensitive people as well.
Implications/limitations: This research seeks to extend positive-management research and meaningfulness in work research to identify those most likely to benefit from these approaches to management and job design. The convenience sample from only white-collar workers and managers, one industry, and one country limits its generalizability.
Further research: Compare and contrast different cultures to determine similarities and differences in individuals’ meaningfulness sensitivity in work. To address study limitations, the research will be transparent enough to support replication across any number of environments and levels of staff.
Research purpose: The proposed qualitative research study seeks to answer the research question, “How best to define meaningfulness sensitivity in work?” Job design adaptation, which forms a foundation for finding meaningfulness in work, is a motivator that results in happier and more productive employees. Yet, not all employees find meaningfulness in work.
Originality/value: This research is important and original because, in defining a new construct, companies can help meaningfulness-sensitive staff to design their jobs for maximum satisfaction and productivity while helping less sensitive staff to develop a more personal value in their work. In addition, this proposed research might provide insight into ways to address negative employee outcomes such as cynicism and high attrition. Methodology/approach: Researchers plan to use focus groups and interviews to collect data. Using an approach guided by the principles of grounded theory, data analysis will use several rounds of coding to define and develop the meaningfulness sensitivity construct, hopefully, identifying antecedents and personal characteristics of sensitive people as well.
Implications/limitations: This research seeks to extend positive-management research and meaningfulness in work research to identify those most likely to benefit from these approaches to management and job design. The convenience sample from only white-collar workers and managers, one industry, and one country limits its generalizability.
Further research: Compare and contrast different cultures to determine similarities and differences in individuals’ meaningfulness sensitivity in work. To address study limitations, the research will be transparent enough to support replication across any number of environments and levels of staff.
References
Albrecht, S. L. (2015), “Meaningful work: Some key questions for research and practice”, in: Burke, R. J., Page, K. M., Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Flourishing in life, work, and careers: Individual wellbeing and career experiences, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 210-234.
Amsteus, M. N. (2014), “The validity of divergent grounded theory method”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 71-87.
Alessandri, G., Borgogni, L., Schaufeli, W. B., Caprara, G. V., Consiglio, C. (2015), “From positive orientation to job performance: The role of work engagement and self-efficacy beliefs”, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 767-788. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9543-2
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B. (2008), “Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 147-154. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.515
Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E., Wrzesniewski, A. (2013), “Job crafting and meaningful work”, in: Dik, B. J., Byrne, Z. S., Steger, M. F. (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace, American Psychological Association, Washington, pp. 81-104.
Brown, K. W., Creswell, J. D., Ryan, R. M. (2015), “Introduction: The Evolution of Mindfulness Science”, in: Brown, K. W., Creswell, J. D., Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and practice, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 1-6.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., Creswell, J. D. (2007), “Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects”, Psychological inquiry, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 211-237. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M. (2003), “The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 84 No. 4, pp. 822-848. DOI: http://dx.doi.org.1.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
Burke, R. J. (2015), “Flourishing in love and work”, in: Burke, R. J., Page, K. M., Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Flourishing in life, work, and careers: Individual wellbeing and career experiences, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 3-25.
Cameron, K., McNaughtan, J. (2014), “Positive Organizational Change”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 445-462. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886314549922
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., Quinn, R. E. (2003), “Foundations of positive organizational scholarship”, in: Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., Quinn, R. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, pp. 3-13.
Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2015), Basics of qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th edn, Sage Publications Inc., Los Angeles.
Creswell, J. W. (2013), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn, Sage Publications Inc., Los Angeles.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Hunter, J. (2003), “Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling”, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 185-199.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Gevers, J. M. (2015), “Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing”, Journal Vocational Behavioral, Vol. 91, pp. 87-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001
Foley, G., Timonen, V. (2015), “Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences”, Health Services Research, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 1195-1210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12275
Fried, Y., Ferris, G. R. (1987), “The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 287-322. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00605.x
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. (2012), The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, 7th edn, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R. (1975), “Development of the job diagnostic survey”, Journal of Applied psychology, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 159-170. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R. (1976), “Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory”, Organizational behavior and human performance, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 250-279. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Havener, C. (1999), Meaning: The secret of being alive, Beaver’s Pond Press, Edina.
Hernandez, C. (2011), “Developing grounded theory using focus groups”, in: Martin V. B., Gynnild, A. (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser, BrownWalker Press, Boca Raton, pp. 117-131.
Hülsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J., Feinholdt, A., Lang, J. W. (2013), “Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 98 No. 2, pp. 310-325.
Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R., Hackman, J. R. (1987), “Work design as an approach to person–environment fit”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 278-296.
Luthans, F. (2002), “Does the positive psychology movement have legs?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 695-706.
Mills, M. J., Fleck, C. R., Kozikowski, A. (2013), “Positive psychology at-work: A conceptual review, state-of-practice assessment, and a look ahead”, Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 153-164.
Mintzberg, H. (2004), Managers, not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Nelson, D. L., Cooper, C. L. (2007), “Positive organization behavior: An inclusive view”, in: Nelson, D. L., Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior, Sage Publications Inc., London, pp. 3-8.
Pratt, M., Ashforth, B. (2003), “Fostering meaningfulness in-working and at-work”, in: Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., Quinn, R. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, pp. 309-327.
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., Lehman, D. R. (2002), “Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 83 No. 5, pp. 1178-1197. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
Selgman, M. P., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000), “Positive psychology: An introduction”, American Psychologist, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 5-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Simons, O. E. (2011), “Why classic grounded theory”, in: Martin, V. B., Gynnild, A. (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser, Brown Walker Press, Boca Raton, pp. 15-30.
Stryker, S. (1968), “Identity salience and role performance: The importance of symbolic interaction theory for family research”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 558-564. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/349494
Stryker, S., Burke, P. J. (2000), “The past, present, and future of an identity theory”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 284-297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D. (2014), “Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy – performance relationship”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 490-507. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2012-0148
Tweed, A., Charmaz, K. (2012), “Grounded Theory Methods for Mental Health Practitioners”, in: Harper, A. R., Thompson, D. (Eds.), Grounded theory methods for mental health practitioners, John Wiley Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, pp. 131-146.
Vuori, T., San, E., Kira, M. (2012), “Meaningfulness-making at-work”, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 231-248. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465641211253110
Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E. (2001), “Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 179-201. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011
Wrzesniewski, A., LoBuglio, N., Dutton, J. E., Berg, J. M. (2013), “Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work”, Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 281-302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ S2046-410X(2013)0000001015
Yeoman, R. (2014), “Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 125 No. 2, pp. 235-251. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10551-013-1894-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
Plagiarism and ghostwriting
In response to the issue of plagiarism and ghostwriting the editors of the Journal of Positive Management has introduced the following rules to counteract these phenomena:
1. Contributors should be aware of their responsibility for a content of manuscripts.
2. Collective authors are obliged to reveal the contribution and an affiliation of each author (i.e. who is an author of specified part of a paper).
3. Any act of dishonesty will be denounced, the editors will inform appropriate institutions about the situation and give evidence of all cases of misconduct and unethical behaviour.
4. The editors may ask contributors for financial disclosure (i.e. contribution of specified institutions).
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 404
Number of citations: 0