MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES AS A METHOD OF MEASURING TEAMS' EFFECTIVENESS

Authors

  • Kinga Hoffmann-Burdzińska University of Economics in Katowice, Department of Human Resources Management, Faculty of Management, Katowice,
  • Olaf Flak University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Radio and Television, Katowice,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2015.016

Keywords

management by objectives, effectiveness, HR team, goal, task, system of organizational terms

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present the method of management by objectives in measuring effectiveness of teams. The main elements of this method – goals and tasks – were used to measure teams’ work on the same project. The quantitative measurers of goals and tasks let assess an effectiveness of teams and compare teams to one another. The methodology of the research was an experiment conducted with on-line management tools named goaler® and tasker® based on the system of organizational terms. This theoretical foundation represent system and positivist approach to management. However, this approach was developed in the mix research method. This paper contains quantitative results and conclusions about effectiveness of teams. For this purpose following measurers were used: numbers of goals and tasks in each group, numbers of actions taken by team managers, duration of teamwork, number of goals and tasks editions. Despite the fact that the method of management by objectives is thoroughly described and parameterized, human contribution in the application of the method in practice appeared still crucial. However, the originality of this paper comes from implementing online management tools which are based on the system of organizational terms and using them to measure human behavior.

References

Adorian, D., Silverberg, D. S., Tomer, D., Wamosher, Z. (1990), “Group discussions with the health-care team: A method of improving care of hypertension in general practice”, Journal of Human Hypertension, Vol. 4, pp. 265-268.

Antoni, C. (2005), “Management by objectives – an effective tool for teamwork”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16 No. 2. pp. 174-184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000311381

Bieniok, H. (2004), Metody sprawnego zarzadzania, Wydawnictwo PLACET, Warszawa.

Brink, C., Rewitzky, I. (2002), “Three dual ontologies”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 543-568. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021204628219

Chodorek, M. (2010), “Self-assessment of the positive potential of organisation by managers of Polish companies - research results”, Journal of Positive Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 85-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2010.007

Daft, R. L. (2010), Management, Cengage Learning, Mason.

Drucker, P. F. (2008), Praktyka zarządzania, Wydawnictwo MT Biznes, Warszawa.

Etzel, M. J., Ivancevich, J. M. (1974), “Management by objectives in marketing: philosophy, process and problems”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 4. pp. 47-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1250391

Flak, O. (2007), “Układ wielkości organizacyjnych jako obiekt badań”, in: Nalepka, A. (Ed.), Organizacje komercyjne i niekomercyjne wobec wzmożonej konkurencji oraz wzrastających wymagań konsumentów, Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz, pp. 64-74.

Flak, O. (2008), “Konceptualizacja układu wielkości organizacyjnych”, in: Nalepka, A. (Ed.), Organizacje komercyjne i niekomercyjne wobec wzmożonej konkurencji oraz wzrastających wymagań konsumentów, Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz, pp. 13-22.

Flak, O. (2010), “Wymiary i wielkości mierzone w układzie wielkości organizacyjnych”, in: Nalepka, A. (Ed.), Organizacje komercyjne i niekomercyjne wobec wzmożonej konkurencji oraz wzrastających wymagań konsumentów, Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz, pp. 11-21.

Flak, O. (2012), “Management sciences”, in: Nalepka, A., Ujwary, A. (Eds.), Business and Non-profit Organizations Fading Increased Competition and Growing Customers’ Demands. Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz, pp. 9-18.

Flak, O. (2013), “Theoretical foundation for managers’ behavior analysis by graph-based pattern matching”, International Journal of Contemporary Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 110-123.

Glykas, M. (2011), “Performance measurement in business process, workflow and human resource management”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 241-265. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/kpm.387

Krzyżanowski, L. (1985), Podstawy nauki zarządzania, PWN, Warszawa.

McGregor, D. (1990), “An uneasy look at performance appraisal”, in: Vroom, V. (Ed.), Manage People, Not Personnel: Motivation and Performance Appraisal, Harvard Business Review, pp. 89-94.

Prechtl, P. (2007), Wprowadzenie do filozofii języka, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków.

Reinfuss, R. (2009), MBO prosta i skuteczna technika zarządzania firmą, Wydawnictwo HELION, Gliwice.

Ross, K. E. (1971), “Management by objectives applied to the business communication class”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 8 No. 2. pp. 45-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194367100800201

Szelagowska-Rudzka, K. (2015), “Management Style as Determinant of Employees’ Direct Participation in ICT Industry: Case Study”, in: Dias Rouco, J. C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance 2015, Academic Conferences International Limited, Reading, pp. 478-486.

Tosi, H. L., Rizzo, J. R., Carroll, S. J. (1970), “Setting goals in management by objectives”, California Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 4. pp. 70-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41164307

Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2. pp. 171-180. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.

Journal of Positive Management

Downloads

Published

2016-04-16

How to Cite

1.
HOFFMANN-BURDZIŃSKA, Kinga and FLAK, Olaf. MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES AS A METHOD OF MEASURING TEAMS’ EFFECTIVENESS. Journal of Positive Management. Online. 16 April 2016. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 67-82. [Accessed 8 December 2024]. DOI 10.12775/JPM.2015.016.

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.

Plagiarism and ghostwriting

In response to the issue of plagiarism and ghostwriting the editors of the Journal of Positive Management has introduced the following rules to counteract these phenomena:

1. Contributors should be aware of their responsibility for a content of manuscripts.

2. Collective authors are obliged to reveal the contribution and an affiliation of each author (i.e. who is an author of specified part of a paper).

3. Any act of dishonesty will be denounced, the editors will inform appropriate institutions about the situation and give evidence of all cases of misconduct and unethical behaviour.

4. The editors may ask contributors for financial disclosure (i.e. contribution of specified institutions).

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1749
Number of citations: 0