Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Rent-seeking by politicians in state-owned enterprises
  • Home
  • /
  • Rent-seeking by politicians in state-owned enterprises
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 18 No. 4 (2019) /
  4. Articles

Rent-seeking by politicians in state-owned enterprises

Authors

  • Bartosz Totleben Poznan University of Economics and Business https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-2285
  • Katarzyna Szarzec Poznan University of Economics and Business https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7675-2239
  • Andreas Kardziejonek Independent researcher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-4770

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2019.034

Keywords

state-owned enterprises, rent-seeking, group of interests, rotations in management personnel

Abstract

Motivation: Notwithstanding the privatization processes, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) continue to play an important role in Poland and other post-socialist countries. Governments declare that privatization is completed and that they do not intend to sell any more enterprises. They justify this by pointing to the national security and strategic sectors in which companies should remain state-owned. Unfortunately, SOEs are used by politicians for economic and personal rent-seeking.

Aim: This article aims to discuss the idea of economic rent-seeking by politicians, particularly its impact on SOEs. We claim that politicians, being a group of interest, capture SOEs in order to achieve private gains for themselves and their parties, which compromises economic performance of these companies. We analyze the mechanism of influence that politicians have on SOEs, including the processes related to rotations of managers and boards of directors after winning parliamentary elections. To illustrate this, we analyze the scale of rotations in Polish SOEs in the years 2001–2017. The rotations are presented in absolute terms. Additionally, an index of the average number of changes in a company was estimated.

Results: We listed several examples of capturing SOEs by politicians. The number of SOEs in EU countries varies. Most SOEs are located in Germany and France. Among the countries of the post-socialist EU–11, Poland, Bulgaria and Romania have the most SOEs. The average number of rotations in personnel was significantly greater in SOEs than in private companies in Poland. Rotations in SOEs are positively correlated with political elections. The greatest increase in the number of changes in SOEs can be observed in the periods following parliamentary elections, regardless of which political party wins. This means that politicians treat SOEs as well-deserved spoils of victory and take it as their own.

References

Atkan, C.C. (2015). Political corruption: an introductory study on terminology and typology. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 7(1).

Bałtowski, M., & Kozarzewski, P. (2016). Formal and real ownership structure of the Polish economy: state-owned versus state-controlled enterprises. Post-Communist Economies, 28(3). doi:10.1080/14631377.2016.1196885.

Bhagwati, J.N. (1982). Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy, 90(5). doi:10.1086/261104.

Borghi, E., Del Bo, C., & Florio, M. (2016). Institutions and firms’ productivity: evidence from electricity distribution in the EU. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistic, 78(2). doi:10.1111/obes.12087.

Bortolotti, B., Cambini, C., & Rondi, L. (2013). Reluctant regulation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3). doi:10.1016/j.jce.2012.12.003.

Bureau van Dijk. (2018). Amadeus database. Retrieved 31.05.2018 from https://amadeus.bvdinfo.com.

European Commission. (2016). State-owned enterprises in the EU: lessons learnt and ways forward in a post-crisis context. Institutional Paper, 031. doi:10.2765/99224.

Fund for Peace. (2018). Retrieved 20.05.2018 from https://fundforpeace.org.

Guasch, J.L., & Weiss, A. (1982). An equilibrium analysis of wage: productivity gaps. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4). doi:10.2307/2297282.

Kowalski, P., Büge, M., Sztajerowska, M., & Egeland, M. (2013). State-owned enterprises: trade effects and policy implications. OECD Trade Policy Papers, 147.

Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3).

Kuźmar, S. (2017). Determinanty regionalnej wydajności pracy w Polsce w latach 1995–2013. Warszawa: Difin.

Ministry of Treasury of the Republic of Poland. (2018). Retrieved 20.05.2018 from http://msp.gov.pl.

National Court Register. (2018). Retrieved 20.05.2018 from https://ems.ms.gov.pl.

OECD. (2005). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. doi:10.1787/9789264009431-10-en.

OECD. (2010). Accountability and transparency: a guide for state ownership. doi:10.1787/9789264056640-en.

OECD. (2015a). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. doi:10.1787/9789264244160-en.

OECD. (2015b). State-owned enterprise governance: a stocktaking of government rationales for enterprise ownership. doi:10.1787/9789264239944-en.

OECD. (2015c). State-owned enterprises in the development process. doi:10.1787/9789264229617-en.

Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Piątek, D. (2016). Instytucje państwa a wzrost gospodarczy w krajach postsocjalistycznych. Poznań: UE w Poznaniu.

Piwowar, B., & Świeca, J. (2010). Lobbing: biznes, prawo, polityka. Warszawa: Poltext.

Privatization Barometer. (2018). Retrieved 20.05.2018 from http://www.privatizationbarometer.com.

Szanyi, M. (2016). The reversal of the privatisation logic in Central European transition economies. Acta Oeconomica, 66(1). doi:10.1556/032.2016.66.1.2.

Szarzec, K., & Nowara, W. (2017). The economic performance of state-owned enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 29(3). doi:10.1080/14631377.2017.1316546.

Szarzec, K., Nowara, W., & Żurek, M. (2017). Forma własności a wyniki ekonomiczne największych przedsiębiorstw krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Gospodarka Narodowa, 289(3). doi:10.33119/gn/100746.

Transparency International. (2018). Retrieved 20.05.2018 from https://www.transparency.org.

Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft. Economic Inquiry, 5(3). doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967.tb01923.x.

Wilkin, J. (2012). Pogoń za rentą za pomocą mechanizmów politycznych. In J. Willkin (ed.), Teoria wyboru publicznego: główne nurty i zastosowania. Warszawa: Scholar.

Wilkin, J. (2016). Instytucjonalne i kulturowe podstawy gospodarowania: humanistyczna perspektywa w ekonomii. Warszawa: Scholar.

Witwicki, P. (2018). Aleksander Kwaśniewski: robienie polityki przez Twittera to szaleństwo. Retrieved 31.05.2018 from http://www.rp.pl.

World Bank. (2018). Retrieved 20.05.2018 from https://data.worldbank.org.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

1.
TOTLEBEN, Bartosz, SZARZEC, Katarzyna and KARDZIEJONEK, Andreas. Rent-seeking by politicians in state-owned enterprises. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 31 December 2019. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 515-529. [Accessed 24 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2019.034.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 4 (2019)

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 871
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop