The number of pupils and educational effects in comprehensive secondary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2017.013Keywords
number of pupils in a school, educational value added (EVA), comprehensive secondary school, socio-cultural capitalAbstract
Motivation: There may be a significant correlation between the number of pupils in a school and their learning performance. Some studies point to the negative impact of schools with a large number of pupils on the educational results achieved. At the same time, the demographic crisis that has been deepening steadily for several years now represents an important motivation for rationalising the existing network of schools.
Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the optimum size of schools based on the criterion of examination results expressed through educational value added.
Results: The analyses conducted in this study showed that the comprehensive secondary schools with over 600 pupils had the highest learning outcomes as expressed through educational value added. The lowest educational effectiveness was found in schools with less than 150 pupils. A dependency was discovered whereby the effectiveness of education increases as the number of pupils grows. Due to the lack of data concerning examination results in schools with more than 1,000 pupils (value indicated in American studies as the threshold value for positive learning outcomes), it was not possible to determine the maximum number of pupils that guarantees satisfactory learning outcomes.
References
Andrews, M., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: are we any closer to a consensus? Economics of Education Re-view, 21(3). doi:10.1016/s0272-7757(01)00006-1.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (2006). Reprodukcja. Elementy teorii systemu naucza-nia. Warszawa: PWN.
Coupe, T., Olefir, A., & Alonso, J.D. (2016). Class size, school size and the size of the school network. Education Economics, 24(3). doi:10.1080/09645292.2015.1015405.
Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Ort, S.W. (2002). Reinventing high school: out-comes of the Coalition Campus Schools Project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3). doi:10.3102/00028312039003639.
Gershenson, S., & Langbein, L. (2015). The effect of primary school size on academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1). doi:10.3102/0162373715576075.
Gottfredson, D.C., & Dipietro, S.M. (2011). School size, social capital, and student vic-timization. Sociology of Education, 84(1). doi:10.1177/0038040710392718.
Hunt, F.J. (1990). Review of the book Reducing the risk — school as communities of support by G.G. Wehlage, R.A. Rutter, G.A. Smith, N. Lesko, & R.R. Fernandez. Journal of Sociology, 26(2).
Kahne, J.E., Sporte, S.E., De La Torre, M., & Easton, J.Q. (2008). Small high schools on a larger scale: the impact of school conversions in Chicago. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3). doi:10.3102/0162373708319184.
Lee, W.E., & Smith, J.B. (1997). High school size: which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3). doi:10.3102/01623737019003205.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: a policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1). doi:10.3102/0034654308326158.
Meier, D.W. (1997). Can the odds be changed? Educational Policy, 11(2).
NIK. (2014). Efekty kształcenia w szkołach publicznych i niepublicznych o uprawni-eniach szkół publicznych. Retrieved 13.06.2017 from http://www.kuratorium.bydgoszcz.uw.gov.pl.
Schwartz, A.E., Stiefel, L., & Wiswall, M. (2016). Are all schools created equal? Learn-ing environments in small and large public high schools in New York City. Econom-ics of Education Review, 52(3). doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.007.
Stanisz, A. (2007). Przystępny kurs statystyki z zastosowaniem STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny. Tom 1. Statystki podstawowe. Kraków: StatSoft.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 442
Number of citations: 0