Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

UNFAIRNESS DOCTRINE AND THE ECONOMIC APPROACH TO CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE PRACTICE OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION IN THE U.S.
  • Home
  • /
  • UNFAIRNESS DOCTRINE AND THE ECONOMIC APPROACH TO CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE PRACTICE OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION IN THE U.S.
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011) /
  4. Articles

UNFAIRNESS DOCTRINE AND THE ECONOMIC APPROACH TO CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE PRACTICE OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION IN THE U.S.

Authors

  • Anna Mokrysz-Olszyńska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2011.007

Abstract

Starting from the concept of treating the protection of consumers’ interests as a necessary element of market order, the U.S. federal law has created a pattern of protection against unfair or misleading acts or market practices, perceived from the perspective of their effects on consumers, competitive relationships, and the functioning of the market mechanism. Such  a  comprehensive  perspective  justifies  the  economic  approach  to  the  regulation of unfair market practices. At the same time, it is intriguing to search for answers to the question of the possibility and desirability of applying elements of economic analysis of law with respect to the interpretation of unfairness to the consumer (unfairness doctrine).

References

A Look Forward With the FTC: Advertising and Marketing Enforcement Challenges, Remarks of David C. Vladeck, Director, FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection, on Electronic Retailing Association, Great Ideas Summit, New Orleans, LA, February 3, 2010

Annys Shin, FTC Moves to Unmask Word-of-Mouth Marketing, Washington Post, December 12, 2006, s. D01, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20061211013

Beales J. H., Competition, Advertising and Health Claims: Legal and Practical Limits on Advertising Regulation, George Mason Law Review 2004, Symposium on Antitrust and Consumer Protection, March 2, 2004

Białaszek W., Pomiędzy ekonomią i psychologią. Ekonomia behawioralna w ujęciu analizy zachowania, http://www.ptpb.pl/www/index.php/publisher/articleview/frmArticleID/42/

Boddewyn J., Advertising Regulation in the 1980´ s: the underlying Global Forces, "Journal of Marketing" (dalej: "J. of M."), 1982/1

Brandt K.T., Preston J.L., The Federal Trade Commission' s Use of Evidence to Determining Deception, "J. of M." 1977/1

Cohen D., Remedies for Consumer, Protection: Prevention, Restitution or Punishment, "J. of M." 1975/4

Cohen D., The Concept of Unfairnessas it relates to Advertising Legislation, “J. of M.”, 1974/3

Cohen D., Unfairness in Advertising revisited, “J. of M.” 1982/1

Cooter R., Ulen Th. Ekonomiczna analiza prawa, wyd. C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2009

Federal Trade Commission, Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising, February 2009, http://www2.ftc.gov/os/2009/02/P085400behavadreport.pdf.

Ford G.T., Calfee J.E., Recent Development in FTC Policy on Deception, “J. of M.” 1986/2

FTC Approves Two Reports to Congress on the National Do Not Call Registry, http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/01/donotcall.shtm

How the FTC brings an action, http://www.ftc.gov/pbc/conline/pubs/general/guidetoftc.shtm

http://ftc.gov/

Jennings C.J., Koebel Engle M., Advertising to Kids and the FTC: A Regulatory Retrospective That Advises the Present

Law and Economics Resources, http://lawecon.lp.findlaw.com/

Miller J., Unfair Competition, Cambridge 1941

Mokrysz-Olszyńska A., Komunikacja nieformalna w marketingu a zakaz reklamy ukrytej, „Zeszyty Naukowe Kolegium Gospodarki Światowej”, SGH Warszawa 2010 nr 27

Muris T.J., Pitofsky R., More than Law Enforcement: The FTC´s Many Tools – A Conversation with Tim Muris and Bob Pitofsky, “Antitrust Law Journal”, Vol. 72, 2005/3

Parry Ch., The FTC and the Economy, http://www.investorguide.com/igu-article-941-government-regulations-the-ftc-and-the-economy.html

Podmolik M.E., Federal Trade Commission's plan to change rules on ad endorsements, testimonials worries marketers, “Consumerist”, March 20, 2009, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212988/posts

Salinger M., Behavioral Economics, Consumer Protection and Antitrust, A Symposium on Antitrust & Behavioral Economics, Lexis Nexis, Documents, Competition Policy International, Spring 2010

Salinger M., Consumer Protection Economics at the FTC. Prepared Remarks for Chief Economist Roundtable, Boston, Massachusetts, April 8, 2006, s. 2.

Stern L.W., Eovaldi T.L., Legal Aspects of Marketing Strategy, Antitrust and Consumer Protection Issues, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1984

Substantial Reliable Evidence Required for FTC Rulemaking, FTC News Notes, March 2, 1984, J. of M." 1985/1

The Federal Trade Commission Act 1914 http://www.stolaf.edu/people/becker/antitrust/statutes/ftc.html

VaGla (Waglowski P.), W USA zakończyły się konsultacje FTC w sprawie WOMM, http://prawo.vagla.pl/node/8424

Vladeck D.C., Promoting Consumer Privacy: Accountability and Transparency in the Modern World, New York University, October 2, 2009.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF (Język Polski)

Published

2011-12-31

How to Cite

1.
MOKRYSZ-OLSZYŃSKA, Anna. UNFAIRNESS DOCTRINE AND THE ECONOMIC APPROACH TO CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE PRACTICE OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION IN THE U.S. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 31 December 2011. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 109-128. [Accessed 8 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2011.007.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011)

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 501
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop