Assessment Of The Level Of Fiscal Sustainability Of Selected European Union Member States In 2014, 2017, 2020 And 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2025.17Keywords
fiscal sustainability, multidimensionality, Hellwig method.Abstract
Motivation: Fiscal sustainability constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for the long-term stability of public finances and the resilience of economies to external disturbances. Successive global and regional crises, including the global financial crisis, the sovereign debt crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the energy and security shocks related to geopolitical developments, have exposed the vulnerability of fiscal systems within the European Union (EU). States characterized by a higher degree of fiscal sustainability were able to mitigate the adverse macroeconomic and social effects of such crises more effectively, whereas fiscally weaker economies experienced prolonged instability and higher adjustment costs. Consequently, the assessment of fiscal sustainability acquires not only theoretical but also practical significance for shaping fiscal governance. While the subject has been widely discussed in the literature, existing studies frequently focus on single indicators or limited periods, which underscores the need for multidimensional and comparative analyses conducted within a longer time horizon.
Aim: The principal objective of this article is to identify the key determinants of fiscal sustainability and to evaluate its level across EU Member States in 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2023. By applying an integrated, synthetic measure, the study addresses the identified research gap, offering a comprehensive and temporally consistent framework for the comparative assessment of fiscal sustainability among EU economies.
Results: The Synthetic Measure of Fiscal Sustainability (SMFS) was constructed by employing the modified Hellwig method with Mahalanobis distance. The analysis incorporated five diagnostic variables: the public debt-to-GDP ratio, the budget balance-to-GDP ratio, the GDP growth rate, the current account balance, and EMU bond yields. Empirical data were derived from Eurostat. Hierarchical cluster analysis was subsequently applied to classify Member States into homogeneous groups according to their fiscal sustainability levels. The results indicate that Germany maintained the highest level of fiscal sustainability throughout the examined period, followed by the Netherlands and Malta. In contrast, Greece recorded the lowest SMFS values in 2014 and 2017, France in 2020, and Ireland in 2023. Overall, five distinct clusters of countries were identified, ranging from low to high sustainability. The findings demonstrate significant heterogeneity within the EU and underscore the necessity of designing fiscal frameworks that are both country-specific and consistent with the requirements of supranational fiscal governance.
References
Adamowicz M., & Janulewicz P. (2012). Wykorzystanie metod wielowymiarowych w określeniu pozycji konkurencyjnej gminy na przykładzie województwa lubelskiego, Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych, 13(1), 17-28.
Afonso A. (2005). Fiscal Sustainability: The Unpleasant European Case. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 61(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1628/0015221053722532.
Afonso A., & Coelho J. C. (2024). Fiscal sustainability, fiscal reactions, pitfalls and determinants. Applied Economics, 57(26), 3560–3571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2337808.
Afonso A., & Jalles J. T. (2019). Fiscal Reaction Functions Across the World. Quest of Statistical (In)significance. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis,75(3), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1628/fa-2018-0023.
Afonso, A., & Rault, C. (2010). What do we really know about fiscal sustainability in the EU? A panel data diagnostic. Review of World Economics, 145(4), 731–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0027-9
Alesina A.,& Perotti R. (1995).Fiscal Expansions and Adjustments in OECD Countries, Economic Policy, Working Paper No. 5214.
Bąk A. (2016). Porządkowanie liniowe obiektów metodą Hellwiga i TOPSIS – analiza porównawcza, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 426.
Begg D., Vernasca G., Fischer S.,& Dornbbusch R. (2011).Makroekonomia. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Bénassy-Quéré, A., & Roussellet, G. (2014). Fiscal sustainability in the presence of systemic banks: The case of EU countries. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-014-9293-0
Blanchard O., Chouraqui J. C., Hagemann R. P.,& Sartor N. (1990).The sustainability of fiscal policy: New answers to an old question. OECD Economic Studies, No. 15.
Brady, G. L., & Magazzino, C. (2018). Fiscal Sustainability in the EU. Atlantic Economic Journal,46(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-018-9588-4.
Buiter W. H. (1985). A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic Policy, 1(1), 13–61.
Collignon, S. (2012). Fiscal policy rules and the sustainability of public debt in Europe. International Economic Review, 53(2), 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00690.x
Filipiak B. Z.,& Wyszkowska D. (2022).Stabilność fiskalna w krajach UE. Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician, vol. 67, 8, 17–40, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9703.
Göndör, M. (2019). Fiscal sustainability: Comparative trends in the European Union and challenges for Romania. Curentul Juridic, 22(4), 45–56. https://revcurentjur.ro/
Gwóźdź, T., & Kołodziej, D. (2024). Fiscal sustainability – a comparative approach. RAIP, 1(XXIV), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4679.
Hellwig Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału kraju ze względu na poziom rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr, Przegląd Statystyczny, 4.
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/FiscalRules/matrix/matrix.html.
Hwang C. L., & Yoon K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9.
IMF, Fiscal Rules Dataset 1985 - 2021, (2022), IMF Fiscal Affairs Department, Retrieved 14.01.2025 from:
Iwacewicz-Orłowska A., & Sokołowska D. (2016). Ocena realizacji koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju w podregionach województw Polski Wschodniej z wykorzystaniem metody wzorca rozwoju Hellwiga, Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 1(79), 182-197, https://doi.org/10.15290/ose.2016.01.79.12.
Konopka P. (2021).Metody wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji w badaniu ryzyka finansowania przedsiębiorstw, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
Kopiński A. (2014). Taksonomia i zastosowanie metody Hellwiga w ocenie efektywności funduszu inwestycyjnych, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 330, 192-204.
Kopits G., & Symansky S. (1998). Fiscal Policy Rules. IMF Occasional Paper No. 162.
Kopits, M. G., & Symansky, M. S. A. (1998). Fiscal policy rules. International Monetary Fund.
Krakowiak-Bal A. (2005). Wykorzystanie wybranych miar syntetycznych do budowy miary rozwoju infrastruktury technicznej, Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 3, 71-82.
Larch, M., & Martins, J. N. (2009). Fiscal policy making in the European Union: An assessment of current practice and challenges. Routledge.
Marchewka-Bartkowiak K. (2010). Reguły fiskalne. Analizy BAS, nr 7 (32).
Papadopoulos, A. P., & Sidiropoulos, M. G. (1999). The sustainability of fiscal policies in the European Union. International Advances in Economic Research, 5(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295078
Postuła, M., Kawarska, A., & Chmielewski, W. (2025). The Reform of European Public Debt Regulations – an Opportunity and a Challenge for EU Member States. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 28(2), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.28.10.
Roszkowska E.,& Filipowicz-Chomko M. (2021). Measuring Sustainable Development Using an Extended Hellwig Method: A Case Study of Education, Social Indicators Research, 153, 299–322, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02491-9.
Roszkowska E.,& Filipowicz-Chomko M.,& Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak A.,& Majewska E. (2024). Extended Hellwig’s method utilizing entropy-based weights and Mahalanobis distance: applications in evaluating sustainable development in the education area. Entropy, 26(3), 197, https://doi.org/10.3390/e26030197.
Schick A. (2005). Sustainable Budget Policy: Concepts and Approaches. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(1).
Steel I., & Harris T. (2020). COVID-19 Economic Recovery: Fiscal Stimulus Choices for Lower-Income Countries. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.
Stoian, A., Obreja Brașoveanu, L., & Brașoveanu, I. V. (2018). A framework to assess fiscal vulnerability: Empirical evidence for European Union countries. Sustainability, 10(7), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072268
The ‘general escape clause’ within the Stability and Growth Pact: Fiscal flexibility for severe economic shocks (2020).European Parliament, Retrieved 31.01.2025 from::https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2020)649351.
Vanhorebeek, F., and Van Rompuy, P. (1995). Solvency and Sustainability of Fiscal Policies in the EU. De Economist, 143(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384910.
Wójcicki W. (2021). Zrozumieć finanse publiczne, Wydawnictwo Państwowej Szkoły wyższej im. Papieża Jana Pawła II w Białej Podlaskiej, Biała Podlaska.
Wysocki F. (2010). Metody taksonomiczne w rozpoznawaniu typów ekonomicznych rolnictwa i obszarów wiejskich, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego, Poznań.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paweł Konopka, Patrycja Łapińska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 176
Number of citations: 0