Social perception of the impact of AI algorithms on human work: the example of platform-mediated courier and driver work in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2024.029Keywords
Artificial intelligence, digital labour platforms, institutions, platform workAbstract
Motivation: The use of automated management for allocating tasks, monitoring and evaluating the service of platform workers operating through digital labor platforms (DLPs) has given rise to numerous threats to human work. The article identifies the emergence of DLPs as a kind of institutional disruption that requires changes in the existing institutional order. The draft EU Directive on improving working conditions in platform work makes it worthwhile to discuss its provisions regulating algorithmic management, including the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on human work.
Aim: The aim of the article is to examine what adult Poles think about changes in the labor market institutions involving the shift towards human oversight of the AI-assisted automated management of platform work. It presents the findings of the Author’s survey on society’s attitude towards regulating how AI is used for managing a popular type of food delivery and passenger transportation services, ordered and executed through DLPs.
Results: The survey showed that respondents perceive AI control of platform work as a legitimate, modern development that ensures service quality and safety. Yet, they are also in favor of human oversight of decisions made by AI algorithms. The survey findings are relevant in view of implementing the provisions of the said EU Directive in Poland.
References
Aloisi, A., de Stefano, V. (2022). Your boss is an algorithm: Artificial intelligence, platform work and labor. Hart Publishing.
Aloisi, A., Potocka-Sionek, N. (2022). De-gigging the labor market? An analysis of the „algorithmic management” provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive. Italian Labor Law e-Journal, 15(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/15027.
Aloisi, A., Rainone, S., Countouris, N. (2023). An unfinished task? Matching the Plat-form Work Directive with the EU and international „social aquis”. ILO Working Paper 101, ILO.
Balkaya, E., Yarbaşhi, I.Y., Tepeler, M.I. (2023). Determinants of Demand in Digital Platform-Mediated Service Work in Turkey: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 15(13), 10521. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310521
Berg, J., Cherry, M.A., Rani, U. (2019). Digital labor platforms: a need for international regulations? Revista de Economia Laboral, 16(2), 104-128.
Bissell, D. (2020). Affective Platform Urbanism: Changing Habits of Digital on-Demand Consumption. Geoforum, 115, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.026.
Council of the EU (2024). Proposal for the directive of the European Parliament and the Council on improving working conditions in platform work - Analysis of the fi-nal compromise text with a view to agreement. Brussels, 8 March 2024. Retrived 10.06.2024 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d581722d-dd70-11ee-b9d9-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-search.
Demir, I. (2024). Errand Runners of Digital Platform Capitalism: The Errand Economy as a Contribution to the Discussion on the Gig Economy. TripleC, 22(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1438.
Deranty, J.P., Corbin, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences. AI & Society, 39, 675-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01496-x.
Dif-Pradalier, M., Jammet, T., Tiberghien, J., Bignami, F., Cuppini, N. (2023). Plat-forms in the city and cities at the service of platforms: An urban perspective on the platform economy and workers’ responses. The Economic and Labor Relations Re-view, 34(4), 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2023.53.
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B. (Eds.) (2023). Network Readiness Index 2023. Portulans Insti-tute. Retrived 1.06.2024 from https://networkreadinessindex.org/.
European Commission (2019). A definition of AI. Main capabilities and disciplines. High Level Experts Group on Artificial Intelligence. Brussels. Retrived 1.06.2024 from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines.
European Commission (2021a). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work. Brussels. Retrived 9.12.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0762
European Commission (2021b). Study to support the impact assessment of an EU initiative to improve the working conditions in platform work. Annexes. Luxem-bourg Publication Office of the European Union.
Fiori, S. (2002). Alternative visions of change in Douglass North’s new institutional-ism. Journal of Economic Issues, XXXVI(4), 1025- 1043.
Furubotn, E.G., Richter, R. (1998). Institutions and economic theory. The contribution of the New Institutional Economics. University of Michigan Press.
Hall, J.V., Krueger, A.B. (2017). An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States. ILR Review, 71(3), 705-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917717222.
Harries, S. (2012). Innovation and change: Ideas, networks and communities. In S. Harries (Ed.), Records Management and Knowledge Mobilisation (pp. 115-141) . Chandos Information Professional Series, Chandos Publishing.
Jesnes, K., Neumann, D., Trappmann, V., de Becdeliévre, P. (2023). The role of worker collectives among app-based food delivery couriers in France, Germany and Nor-way: All the same or different. In J. Drahokoupil & K. Vandaele (Eds.), A modern guide to labor and the platform economy (pp. 258-273). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lee, M.K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., Dabbish, L, (2015). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In B. Begole & J. Kim (Eds.), CHI 2015: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1603-1612). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548.
Mazur, S. (2013). Zmiana instytucjonalna. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2-3(24-25), 34-43. doi: 10.7366/1898352932503.
Mӧhlman, M., Zalmanson, L. (2017). Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber’s autonomy. In Y.I. Kim, R. Agarwal & J.K. Lee (Eds.), Pro-cedings of the 38 International Conference on Information Systems. Transforming Society with Digital Innovation (pp. 5375-5391), ICIS 2017, Association for Infor-mation Systems.
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Nowik, P. (2020), Specyfika pracy na globalnych platformach internetowych w świetle zarządzania algorytmicznego. Studia Prawnicze KUL, 1, 269-292. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.10637.
Ostoj, I. (2012). Formalne i nieformalne instytucje rynku pracy. Wydawnictwo Uni-wersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
Owczarczuk, M. (2023). Ethical and regulatory challenges amid artificial intelligence development: an outline of the issue. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 22(2), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2023.017.
Owczarek, D. (2022). Don’t gig up, never! Country update - Poland. Institute of Public Affairs.
Özbilgin, M., Gundogdu, N., & Akalin, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Gig Economy and Precarity. In E. Meliou, J. Vassilopoulou, M. Ozbilgin (Eds). Diversity and Pre-carious Work During Socio-Economic Upheaval (284-305). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108933070.014.
Peetz, D. (2023). Can and how should the gig worker loophole be closed? The Econom-ic and Labor Relations Review, 34(4), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2023.57.
Pettica-Harris, A., de Gama, N., Ravishankar, M.N. (2020). Postcapitalist precarious work and those in the ‘drivers’ seat: Exploring the motivations and lived experi-ences of Uber drivers in Canada. Organization, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418757332.
Piasna, A. (2024). Digital labor platforms and social dialogue at EU level: How new players redefine actors and their roles and what this means for collective bargain-ing. Social Policy and Administration, 58(4) (pp. 568-582). https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13000.
Potocka-Sionek N., Aloisi A. (2024). The spillover effect of algorithmic management and how (not) to tame it. In: K. Vandaele & S. Rainone (Eds), The Elgar companion to regulating platform work. Insights from the food delivery sector. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar (forthcoming). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4738680
Pulignano, V. (2024). Unveiling ‘Algorithm Governance’ Shaping Labor Platforms’ Strategies and Working Conditions in the Digital Era. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 4(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WJDS/4.3.6.
Rada UE (2024a). Pracownicy platform. Rada zatwierdza porozumienie w sprawie nowych przepisów mających poprawić warunki pracy. Retrived 3.04.2024 from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/pl/press/press-releases/2024/03/11/platform-workers-council-confirms-agreement-on-new-rules-to-improve-their-working-conditions/
Rada UE (2024b), Wniosek dotyczący Dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie poprawy warunków pracy za pośrednictwem platform internetowych – Analiza ostatecznego tekstu kompromisowego w celu wypracowania porozumie-nia. Retrived 10.04.2024 from https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7212-2024-ADD-1/pl/pdf
Redmond, W.H. (2008). Formal institutions in historical perspective. Journal of Eco-nomic Issues, 42(2), 569-576.
Schwellnus, C., Geva, A., Pak, M., Veiel, R. (2019). Gig economy platforms: boom or bane. Economic Department Working Papers No. 1550. OECD.
Sheikh, H., Prins, C., Schrijvers, E. (2023). Mission AI. The New System Technology. The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy. Springer.
Souza Ferreira, W.S.,Vasconcellos, Vale, G.M., Bernardes, P. (2023). Institutional dis-ruption and technology platforms: the Uber case. Revista de Gest~ao, 30(2), 113-132. DOI 10.1108/REGE-12-2020-0127.
Torre, F., Teigland, R., Engstam, L. (2020 ). AI leadership and the future of corporate governance: changing demands for board competence. In A. Larrson & R. Teigland (Eds.), The Digital Transformation of Labor Automation, the Gig Economy and Welfare (pp. 116-146). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Umair, A., Conboy, K., Whelan, E. (2023). Examining technostress and its impact on worker well-being in the digital gig economy. Internet Research, 33(7), 206-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0214.
Vandevenne, E., Vanroelen, C. (2023). Measuring employment precariousness in gig jobs: A pilot study among food couriers in Brussels. Work, 77(2), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-220691.
Wiener, M., Cram, W.A., Benlian, A. (2023). Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), 485-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Izabela Ostoj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 219
Number of citations: 0
