CORRUPTION, GOVERNMENT’S ECONOM-IC PERFORMANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST IN THE MENA REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2024.020Keywords
Government’s performance, corruption, Institutional Trust, MENA RegionAbstract
Motivation: Countries in the MENA region are perceived as highly corrupt. They are struggling to achieve clear results against corruption. Unfortunately, no country has reached a significant improvement on the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) published by Transparency International in 2021. The United Arab Emirates and Qatar are the top performers in the Region. The former was ranked 69 out of 100, the latter 63 out of 100. Libya (17/100), Yemen (16/100), and Syria (13/100) awfully damaged by the war are the worst. The state-of-the-art impacts trust at the national level and the performance of public institutions as well.
Aim: This paper aims to study the relationship between corruption and trust, and its impact on public economic performance in the MENA region. It is based on the data provided by Arabbarometer, 2018-2019. Our sample includes 8215 individuals located in 12 countries in that region. To test all our hypotheses simultaneously, we have used the structural equation modeling method with SmartPLS software. The latent variable of the research model – corruption, fighting corruption, and economic performance of the government- all of them are used as a reflective measurement. However, trust is included in the model as a formative measurement.
Results: The findings show that trust in public institutions, measured by a formative scale, is negatively impacted by the level of corruption (-0,36). It also depends on the efforts made by the state to fight corruption in public agencies and institutions (0,37). Trust is one of the most important components of social capital. The performance of public policies is highly correlated to the level of trust between public administration and individuals. The government’s economic performance depends on the level of that trust (0,341), the efforts made to fight corruption (0,173), and public corruption (-230). All hypotheses are significant at 1%.References
Beesley, C., & Hawkins, D. (2022). Corruption, institutional trust and political engagement in Peru. World Development, 151, 105743.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314.
Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of Formative Measure-ment in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly , 33(4), 689–707.
Chang, E. C. C., & Chu, Y. H. (2006). Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies? Journal of Politics, 68(2), 259–271.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Gambetta, D. (2000). Can We Trust Trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Electronic, pp. 213–237).
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
Hair, Jr. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
Jarvis, B. C., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Market-ing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
Kim, S. (2010). Public Trust in Government in Japan and South Korea: Does the Rise of Critical Citizens Matter? Public Administration Review, 70(5), 801–810.
Koubaa, S. (2014). Management stratégique des connaissances et capacité d’absorption des connaissances. La Revue Des Sciences de Gestion, 2(266), 109–120.
Kubbe, I. (2013). Corruption and Trust: A model design. Zeitschrift Fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 7(September), 117–135.
Lavallée, E., Razafindrakoto, M., & François, R. (2008). Corruption and trust in political institutions in sub-Saharan Africa. Afrobarometer Working Pa-pers, 102, 25.
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.
Morris, S. D., & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258–1285.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
Richey, S. (2010). The impact of corruption on social trust. American Politics Research, 38(4), 676–690.
Rothstein, B. (2013). Corruption and social trust: Why the fish rots from the head down. Social Research, 80(4), 1009–1032.
Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.
Uslaner, E. M. (2004). Trust and Corruption. In J. G. Lambsdorf, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), Corruption and the New Institutional Economics (pp. 76–92). Routledge.
van der Meer, T. W. G. (2017). Political Trust and the “Crisis of Democracy.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, September, 1–22.
Wang, C. H. (2016). Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 211–231.
Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The Performance-Trust Link : Implications for Performance Measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Salah KOUBAA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 201
Number of citations: 0