Motives and expectations of platform workers in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2023.022Keywords
motives for work, work labour platforms, gig economyAbstract
Motivation: Nowadays in economic literature the increasing popularity of the concept of platform work and gig economy can be observed. Nevertheless, this growth is not accompanied by a sufficient amount of empirical research into this new phenomenon, especially referring to the Polish labour market. Therefore, such studies on this issue are fundamental.
Aim: The first aim of the article was to identify the main motives why some people in Poland started rendering services as platform workers. The second one was to assess to what extent the expectations of platform workers in Poland have been met.
Results: Based on the analysis of the current world literature and using the method of the diagnostic survey, it was verified which circumstances and features of platform work were crucial to workers in Poland and what reasons led to expectations not being met. It turned out, that income, flexibility and independence are crucial motives. A concern for majority of respondents was low and unstable incomes. Many workers were also disappointed with the apparent flexibility. In general, the expectations of platform workers in Poland seem to be met to a significant extent, which may contribute to the growing acceptance of this form of work and its popularity.
References
Akerlof, G.A., & Yellen, J.L. (1990). The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105 (2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937787.
Ashford, S.J., George, E., & Blatt, R. (2007). Old assumptions, new work: the opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 65–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559807.
Becker, G.S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949.
Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., Six Silberman, M. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: towards decent work in the online world. Retrieved 23.06.2023 from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_645337.pdf.
Chiappori, P.-A., & Lewbel, A. (2015). Gary Becker’s a theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 125(583), 410–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12157.
de Stefano, V., Aloisi, A. (2018). European legal framework for digital labour platforms. https://doi.org/10.2760/78590.
Drever, J. (1956). A dictionary of psychology. Penguin Books.
Farrell, D., & Greig, F. (2016). Paychecks, paydays, and the online platform economy: big data on income volatility. Proceedings: Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 109, 1–40.
Gajderowicz, T. (2016). Dekompozycja korzyści z zatrudnienia w świetle literatury teoretycznej i empirycznej. Studia Ekonomiczne, 293, 7–22.
Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, home production and work: the theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1099–1123.
ILO. (2021). The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Retrieved 23.06.2023 from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_771749.pdf.
Kirdina, S., & Sandstrom, G. (2010). Institutional matrices theory as a framework for both western and non-western people to understand the global village. MPRA Paper, 18642, 1–12.
Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A.M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237.
Lancaster, T. (1979). Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment. Econometrica, 47(4), 939–956. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914140.
Mincer, J. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: a study of labor supply. In Aspects of labor economics (pp. 63–105). Princeton University Press.
Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Linda-Eling, L. (2008). Employee motivation. Harvard Business Review, July–August.
Ostoj, I. (2021). The logic of gig economy: origins and growth prospects. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 66(4), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2021-0025.
Rätzel, S. (2009). Revisiting the neoclassical theory of labour supply: disutility of labour, working hours, and happiness. FEMM Working Paper, 5, 1–28.
Rosen, S. (1986). The theory of equalizing differences. In O. Ashenfelter, & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, 1, 641–692.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(86)01015-5.
Spreitzer, G.M, Cameron, L., & Garret L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332.
Vallas, S., & Schor, J.B. (2020). What do platforms do? understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857.
Vercherand, J. (2014). The neoclassical model of the labour market. In: J. Vercherand (Ed.) Labour: a heterodox approach (pp. 53–74). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373618_3.
Young, P.T. (1961). Motivation and emotion: a survey of the determinants of human and animal activity. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1037/13138-000.
Zipperer, B., McNicholas, C., Poydock, M., Schneider, D., & Harknett, K. (2022). National survey of gig workers paints a picture of poor working conditions, low pay. Retrieved 23.06.2023 from https://files.epi.org/uploads/250647.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Magdalena Tusińska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 715
Number of citations: 0
