Institutions for digital labour platforms: results of a study conducted in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2023.008Keywords
platform work, gig economy, regulations, PolandAbstract
Motivation: The development of labour platforms is one of the manifestations of the platformisation of the economy. Their growing popularity has revealed institutional vulnerabilities, particularly with regard to the weak position of platform workers, related to their ambiguous status, controversial regulations of labour platforms including algorithmic control of tasks performed, the rate and method of payment for services rendered, insufficient knowledge of how platforms operate. They are all the subject of intense discussion, also at the EU level.
Aim: The identification of desired directions of changes in the institutional environment of labour platforms in Poland — as expected by the society — against the background of the ongoing discussion on this subject in other countries and at the EU level.
Results: A diagnostic survey conducted on a large sample of Polish citizens aged 18–70 revealed that the most expected changes that would improve the quality of the institutional environment of labour platforms are: the introduction of a minimum payment for work services and the adoption of the independent worker status, the introduction of universal rules regulating digital platform operations, as well as the introduction of training and information materials on how labour platforms work. Poles attach less importance to the right of platform workers to establish trade unions.
References
Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform work in the EU: lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead. European Labour Law Journal, 13(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557.
Aloisi, S., & Potocka-Sionek, N. (2022). De-gigging the labour market: an analysis of “algorithmic management” provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive. Italian Labour Law e-Journal, 15(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/15027.
Autor, D., Mindell, D., & Reynolds, E. (2020). The work of the future: building better jobs in age of intelligent machines. Retrieved 22.02.2023 from https://workofthefuture.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020-Final-Report4.pdf.
Bessa, I., Joyce, S., Neuman, D., Stuart, M., Trappman, V., & Umney, C. (2022). A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour paltforms. ILO Working Paper, 70, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.54394/CTNG4947.
Bilić, A., & Smokvina, V. (2022). What lesson could Croatia learn from a comparative perspective regarding the labour market status of on-demand platform workers. InterEULawEast, 9(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.3.
Boavida, N., Brandao, A., Naumann, R., Roque, I. & Azevedo, R. (2021). Case stud-ies on the digital labour platforms in Portugal: final national report of project crowdwork. Retrived 20.08.2022 from https://crowd-work.eu/documents.
Carelli, M., Oliveira, R., & Grillo, S. (2021). Concept and criticism of digital labour platforms. Labour & Law Issues, 7(1), C.28–C.53. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/13110.
Dazzi, D. (2019). Gig economy in Europe. Italian Labour Law e-Journal, 12(2), 67–122. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/9925.
De Stefano, V., Durri, I., Stylogiannis, C., & Wouters, M. (2021). Platform work and employment relationship. ILO Working Paper, 27, 1–58
European Commission. (2021a). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work (COM/2021/762 final).
European Commission. (2021b). Study to support the impact assessment of an EU initiative to improve the working conditions in platform work: annexes. Retrieved 22.02.2023 from https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24961&langId=en.
European Parliament resolution of 16 September 2021 on fair working conditions, rights and social protection for platform workers: new forms of employment linked to digital development (2019/2186(INI)) (OJ C 117, 11.3.2022).
Huws, U., Spencer, N.H., Coates, M., & Holts, K. (2019). The platformisation of work in Europe: results of research in 13 European countries. Retrieved 22.02.2023 from https://feps-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/publications/the%20platformisation%20of%20work%20in%20europe%20-%20final%20corrected.pdf.
Joyce, S., Neumann D., Trappman, V., & Umney, Ch. (2020). A global struggle: worker protest in the platform economy. ETUI Policy Brief, 2, 1–6.
Joyce, S., Stuart, M., & Ford, Ch. (2022). Theorising labour unrest and trade unionism in the platform economy. New Technology, Work and Employment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12252.
Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A.M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237.
Kozak-Maśnicka, M., & Pisarczyk, Ł. (2022). Extending the personal scope of collective bargaining as a chance of gig workers: the Polish case. In J.M.M. Boto, & E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy. a traditional tool for new business models (pp. 211–226). Hart Publishing.
Krzyminiewska, G. (2021). Work and its transformations: from statism-based work to the gig economy. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 20(3), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.034.
Kuriakose, F., & Iyer, D.K. (2021). A case for worker-centric platform economy in India (part 1). Retrieved 21.07.2022 from https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/iit/kuriakoseiyer2021.
Muszyński, K., Pulignano, V., & Mara, C. (2022). Product markets and working conditions on international and reginal food delivery platforms: a study in Poland and Italy. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801211070802.
Naumowicz, K. (2021). Some remarks to the legal status of platform workers in the light of the last European jurisprudence. Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej. Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy, 28(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.21.016.13962.
OECD. (2019). Measuring platforms mediated workers. OECD Digital Economy Papers, 282. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1787/20716826.
Piasna, A. (2020). Counting gigs: how can we measure the scale of online platform work. ETUI Working Paper, 2020.06, 1–21.
Piasna, A., & Drahokoupil, J. (2019). Digital labour in central and eastern Europe: evidence from the ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey. ETUI Working Paper, 2019.12, 1–47.
Potocka-Sionek, N., & Aloisi, A. (2021). “Festina Lente”: the ILO and EU agendas on the digital transformation of work. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 37(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694754.
Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: the promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797012.001.0001.
Pulignano, V., & Marà, C. (2021). Working for nothing in the platform economy: forms and institutional contexts of unpaid labour. Retrieved 21.07.2022 from https://www.solidar.org/system/downloads/attachments/000/001/410/original/Thematic_publication_Working_for_Nothing.pdf?1638980551.
Rolf, S., O’Reilly, J., & Meryon, M. (2022). Towards privatized social and employment protections in the platform economy: evidence from the UK courier sector. Research Policy, 51(5), 104492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104492.
Silberman, M.S., & Jonhston, H. (2020). Using GDPR to improve legal clarity and working conditions on digital labour platforms. ETUI Working Paper, 2020.05, 1–36.
Stojković Zlatanović, S., & Ostojić, I. (2021). Labour law status of platform workers.: between autonomy and subordination. Regional Labour Review, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.18485/iup_rlrc.2021.2.ch16.
Świątkowski, A. (2019). Elektroniczne technologie zatrudnienia ery postindustrialnej. Akademia Ignatianum.
Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2017). The mobilisation of gig economy couriers in Italy: some lessons for the trade union movement. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(3), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917713846.
Todoli-Signes, A. (2017). The “gig economy”: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381.
Webster, N.A., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Intersectional understandings of the role and meaning of platform-mediated work in the pandemic Swedish welfare state. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100025.
Wei, W., & MacDonald, I.T. (2021). Modeling the job quality of “work relationships” in China’s gig economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(4), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12310.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Izabela Ostoj

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 224
Number of citations: 0