Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Risk perception in practice of Polish MNCs in Kazakhstan during COVID-19 time
  • Home
  • /
  • Risk perception in practice of Polish MNCs in Kazakhstan during COVID-19 time
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 21 No. 3 (2022) /
  4. Articles

Risk perception in practice of Polish MNCs in Kazakhstan during COVID-19 time

Authors

  • Małgorzata Jaworek Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-1127
  • Włodzimierz Karaszewski Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8351-4589
  • Magdalena Kuczmarska Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-5122

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.031

Keywords

foreign direct investment, FDI, risk

Abstract

Motivation: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a major crisis in global economy. The year 2020 will be remembered in the history of global economy as the year of a massive supply and demand shock, and, consequently, a slump in economic growth in most countries. The effects of the pandemic will be felt to varying degrees by the majority of the world’s economic entities. One such effect is the radical decrease in global foreign direct investment (FDI). It is hard to assess now how heavily the pandemic will influence the long-term FDI trends. The perception of the pandemic risk is, however, likely to heighten. This article deals with foreign direct investment risks, and more specifically, with the pandemic risk seen as one of natural risks in COVID-19-related contexts.

Aim: The article aims to identify how the enterprises with Polish capital in Kazakhstan perceive the pandemic risk in comparison with other FDI risks. The authors of this paper were co-investigators on a scientific research project concerning FDI in Kazakhstan as exemplified by the investment intensity of Polish enterprises. The project was carried out from 2019 to 2021, i.e., when the pandemic started and during its course. The research concept was, however, created before there were any signs of the pandemic. Therefore, the research questions regarding FDI risk in Kazakhstan were not to any extent inspired by this occurrence. Nevertheless, the question about the pandemic risk was included in the research tool. Thus, the perception of this risk became the subject of research. The findings of partial research that are presented in this article are original in nature, because the assessments constituting their basis were formulated at a time when Kazakhstan, like other countries around the world, struggled with the pandemic and when its effects were unknown.

Results: According to the enterprises with Polish capital in Kazakhstan, the main areas of risk entailed in their operation in this country were, most importantly, the risks of the investment country and global risks. Local currency exchange risk ranked 1st; as many as 70% of respondents said that this risk perception was high. This was followed by global economic events (e.g. depression), performance risks (e.g. product price, transfer risks, the price of capital) and government policy risks (e.g. tax reforms, monetary reforms, price controls, trade restrictions, nationalisation, government regulation, barriers to earnings repatriation). The 5th most distinctly perceived risk by the studied enterprises was global social events risks, including the pandemic risk. 40% of the surveyed entities defined this risk perception as high, and 30% each as medium and small. The fact that the pandemic risk ranked 5th among other FDI risk components in Kazakhstan indicates its great significance to the enterprises operating there at an early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., when the level of uncertainty caused by the pandemic in terms of both its economic and its social effects was very high.

References

Aguiar, S., Aguiar-Conraria, L., Gulamhussen, M.A., & Magalhães, P.C. (2012). Foreign direct investment and home-country political risk: the case of Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 47(2), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2012.0013.

Ashurov, S., Othman, A.H.A., Rosman, R.B., & Haron, R.B. (2020). The determinants of foreign direct investment in Central Asian region: a case study of Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan (a quantitative analysis using GMM). Russian Journal of Economics, 6(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.6.48556.

Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World Economy, 29(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00758.x

Baek, K., & Qian, X. (2011). An analysis on political risks and the flow of foreign direct investment in developing and industrialized economies. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 6(4), 60–91.

Bekaert, G., & Hodrick R.J. (2008). International financial management. Person Prentice Hall.

Bitzenis, A., Tsitouras, A., & Vlachos, V.A. (2009). Decisive FDI obstacles as an explanatory reason for limited FDI inflows in an EMU member state: the case of Greece. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(4), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.03.001.

Buckley, P.J., Chen, L., Clegg, L.J., & Voss, H. (2020). The role of endogenous and exogenous risk in FDI entry choice. Journal of World Business, 55(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101040.

Büsse, M., & Groizard, J.L. (2008). Foreign direct investment, regulations and growth. World Economy, 31(7), 861–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01106.x.

Dosmukhamedov, E.K. (2002). Foreign direct investment in Kazakhstan: politico-legal aspects of post-communist transition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502178.

Erol, C. (1985). An exploratory model of political risk assessment and the decision process of foreign direct investment. International Studies of Management & Organization, 15(2), 5–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40397006.

Escaleras, M., & Register, Ch.A. (2011). Natural disasters and foreign direct investment. Land Economics, 87(2), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.87.2.346.

Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491017.

Hampton, J.J. (2009). Fundamentals of enterprise risk management. how top companies assess risk, manage exposure, and seize opportunity. Amacom.

Harms, P. (2002). Political risk and equity investment in developing countries. Applied Economics Letters, 9(6), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110084064.

Hefeker, C., & Büsse, M. (2005). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. Hamburg Institute of International Economics Discussion Paper, 315, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.704283.

Jaworek, M., Karaszewski, W., & Kuczmarska, M. (2020). Pandemic risk: doesn’t it really matter? Foreign direct investment after COVID-19. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 19(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2020.019.

Jun, K.W., & Singh, H. (1996). The determinants of foreign direct investment: new empirical evidence. Transnational Corporations, 5(2), 67–105.

Karaszewski, W. (Ed.). (2009). Foreign direct investment of Polish companies: its scale, structure, determinants, influence on the competitiveness. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

Karaszewski, W., Jaworek, M., Kuzel, M., Szałucka, M., & Szóstek, A. (2014). Foreign direct investment by Polish companies. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

Levis, M. (1979). Does political instability in developing countries affect foreign investment flow: an empirical examination. Management International Review, 19(3), 59–68.

Li, Q. (2006). Democracy, autocracy, and tax incentives to foreign direct investors: a cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00370.x.

Meldrum, D.H. (2000). Country risk and foreign direct investment: customized, systematic country risk assessment is critical for companies that contemplate activity abroad. Business Economics, 35(1), 33–40.

NBK. (2022). Kazakhstan: balance of payments and external debts for 2021. Retrieved 29.07.2022 from https://nationalbank.kz/en/news/platezhnyy-balans/rubrics/1693.

NBP. (2020). Zagraniczne inwestycje bezpośrednie w Polsce w 2020 r. Retrieved 30.07.2022 from https://www.nbp.pl/home.aspx?f=/publikacje/zib/zib.html.

Oetzel, J.M., & Oh, C.H. (2014). Learning to carry the cat by the tail: firm experience, disasters, and multinational subsidiary entry and expansion. Organization Science, 25(3), 732–756. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0860.

Oh, C.H., & Oetzel, J. (2017). Once bitten twice shy: experiences managing violent conflict risk and MNC subsidiary-level investment and expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 714–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2498.

Osabutey, E.L.C., & Okoro, C. (2015). Political risk and foreign direct investment in Africa: the case of the Nigerian telecommunications industry. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(6), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21672.

Rakhmatullayeva, D.Zh., Bobkov, V.N., & Zhatkanbayev, E.B. (2015). Modeling of social effect of foreign direct investment in the regions of Kazakhstan. Economy of Region, 2, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-23.

Rakhmatullayeva, D.Zh., Kuliyev, I., Beisenbaiyev, Zh., & Tabeyev, T. (2020). Assessment of the influence of FDI on the economic growth of the host country: evidence from Kazakhstan. E3S Web of Conferences, 159, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015906007.

Szóstek, A. (2008). Ryzyko bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych. In W. Karaszewki (Ed.), Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne polskich przedsiębiorstw (pp. 147–164). TNOiK.

Türedi, S. (2018). The effect of corruption and country risk on FDI inflows: empirical evidence from developing countries. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, (21), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.370653.

UNCTAD. (2017). World investment report 2017: investment and the digital economy. https://doi.org/10.18356/e692e49c-en.

UNCTAD. (2021). World investment report 2021: investing in sustainable recovery. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210054638.

UNCTAD. (2022). World investment report 2022: international tax reforms and sustainable investment. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210015431.

WEF. (2007). Global risks 2007: a global risk network report. Retrieved 31.07.2022 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2007.pdf.

WEF. (2015). Global risks 2015. Retrieved 31.07.2022 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_2015_Report15.pdf.

WEF. (2019). The global competitiveness report 2019. Retrieved 08.04.2021 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf.

WEF. (2020). The global risks report 2020. Retrieved 15.04.2020 from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf.

WEF. (2021a). The global competitiveness report: methodology. Retrieved 09.04.2021 from https://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/methodology.

WEF. (2021b). The global risks report 2021. Retrieved 31.07.2022 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf.

WEF. (2022). The global risks report 2022. Retrieved 31.07.2022 from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf.

Wei, S.-J. (2000). How taxing is corruption on international investors. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300558533.

White, C., & Fan, M. (2006). Risk and foreign direct investment. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624832.

World Bank. (2020). Doing business 2020: comparing business regulation in 190 economies. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-2.

Wu, F.W. (1982). The political risk of foreign direct investment in Post-Mao-China: a preliminary assessment. Management International Review, 22(1), 13–25.

Zinecker, M., Doubravský, K., Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B., & Dohnal, M. (2021). The Covid-19 disease and policy response to mitigate the economic impact in the EU. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(3), 742–762. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14585.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

1.
JAWOREK, Małgorzata, KARASZEWSKI, Włodzimierz and KUCZMARSKA, Magdalena. Risk perception in practice of Polish MNCs in Kazakhstan during COVID-19 time. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 30 September 2022. Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 583-601. [Accessed 3 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2022.031.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Małgorzata Jaworek, Włodzimierz Karaszewski, Magdalena Kuczmarska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 814
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop