Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Forecasting the directions of the EU sugar market development after limiting government intervention
  • Home
  • /
  • Forecasting the directions of the EU sugar market development after limiting government intervention
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022) /
  4. Articles

Forecasting the directions of the EU sugar market development after limiting government intervention

Authors

  • Anna Budzyńska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-0585
  • Mirosław Urbanek The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-6921

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.016

Keywords

sugar market, government intervention, sugar quotas, forecasting

Abstract

Motivation: The EU sugar industry is one of the most regulated industry which is subject to import duties, subsidies and quotas. Government intervention in sugar markets significantly affects sugar production, consumption and trade. The GATT/WTO negotiations led to the commencement of the liberalization process in the EU sugar market, and initiated a number of reforms aimed at abolishing government support. Consequently, the sugar market in the EU has undergone considerable changes. Proper recognition of the directions of changes will contribute to reducing the difficulties of entities operating on the global sugar market.

Aim: The purpose of this publication is to present the forecasts made in 2017 regarding the main categories characterizing the EU sugar market and to verify their validity following the analysis of the actual data. The work uses the forecasts made for 2017–2020 based on empirical data collected from 1993–2016, and then verifies their validity when set against the real data.

Results: The results of the research showed that statistical models are not able to predict correctly not only the forecasted values, but also the directions of their changes. The range of indicators of forecast errors was almost 40 percentage points, which reduced their credibility. The Pearson correlation index of over 0.7 indicated a significant correlation between the real data and the forecast values for the consumption or sugar beet harvest, while interpreting the discrepancy coefficient index, which did not exceed 1 for the forecast of the sugar production volume. This allows to conclude that this forecast shows the smallest differentiation in comparison to the actual data obtained.

References

Adenäuer, M. (2008). CAPRI versus AGLINK–COSIMO: two partial equilibrium models, two baseline approaches. Retrieved 05.09.2021 from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/44120/2/268.pdf.

Borrel, B., & Duncan, R. (1992). A survey of the costs of world sugar policies. The World Bank Research Observer, 7(2), 171–194, https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/7.2.171.

Budzyńska, A., & Chojnacki, P. (2018). Competitiveness of EU dairy industry in the global market after the abolition of milk quotas. In K.S. Soliman (Ed.), Innovation management and education excellence through vision 2020. Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference (pp. 2778–2788). International Business Information Management Association.

Chudasama, A. (2016). EU reform has made the sugar industry globally competitive. International Sugar Journal, 118(1412), 537.

European Commission DG Agriculture and Rural Development. (2011). Evaluation of CAP measures applied to the sugar sectors. Retrieved 05.09.2021 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/68ab35fb-06d0-4d0c-bedd-83e66543a39f.

European Commission. (2013). Prospects for agricultural markets and income in the EU 2013–2023. Retrieved 05.09.2021 from http://eurocarne.com/daal/a1/informes/a2/previsionesUE2013-2023.pdf.

European Court of Auditors. (2010). Has the reform of the sugar market achieved its main objectives. https://doi.org/10.2865/41975.

Gohin, A., & Bureau, J. (2006). Modelling the EU sugar supply to assess sectoral policy reforms. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbl006.

Grabowski, W., & Welfe, A. (2011). Global stability of dynamic models. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 782–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.011.

Hass, M. (2018). The abolition of the EU sugar quota system and its consequences. Aktuelle Ernahrungsmedizin, 43(1), S32–S36. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0659-6983.

Hogan, P. (2017). EU sugar quota system comes to an end. Retrieved 05.09.2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_3487.

International Confederation of European Beet Growers. (2015). European sugar beet growers united to face difficult times. Retrieved 18.02.2022 from https://www.cibe-europe.eu/img/user/061-15%20CIBE%20Press%20release%205%20June%202015%20final-1.pdf.

Kuzmenko, E., Smutka, L., Strielkowski, W., Streimikis, J., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Cointegration analysis of the world’s sugar market: the existence of the long-term equilibrium. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 23(4), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2020-4-002.

Maitah, M., Rezbova, H., Smutka, L., & Tomsik, K. (2016). European sugar production and its control in the world market. Sugar Tech, 18(3), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0439-9.

Nolte, S., Buysse, J., van Huylenbroeck, G. (2012). Modelling the effects of an abolition of the EU sugar quota on internal prices, production and imports. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr043.

Pechrova, M., & Simpach, O. (2017). Modelling the development of the consumer price of sugar. In P. Prazak (Ed.), Mathematical methods in economics (pp. 527–531). University of Hradec.

Regulation No 1009/67/EEC of the Council of 18 December 1967 on the common organisation of the market in sugar (OJ 308, 18.12.1967).

Smutka, L., Pulkrabek, J., & Benesova, I. (2014). Current state of world sugar market. Listy Cukrovarnicke a Reparske, 130(2), 70–77.

Soare, E., & Chiurciu, I. (2016). Study on the production and commercialization of the sugar beet at national level and by region of development in Romania. Scientific Papers: Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 16(4), 327–332.

van Berkum, S., Roza, P., & van Tongeren, F. (2005). Impacts of the EU sugar policy reforms on developing countries. Retrieved 05.09.2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Siemen_Van_Berkum/publication/23508200_Impacts_of_the_EU_sugar_policy_reforms_on_developing_countries/links/0912f5123d91582e7f000000/Impacts-of-the-EU-sugar-policy-reforms-on-developing-countries.pdf.

Xinqiang, C., Huixing, C., Yongsheng, Y., Huafeng, W., Wenhui, Z., Jiansen, Z., & Yong, X. (2021). Traffic flow prediction by an ensemble framework with data denoising and deep learning model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 565, 125574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125574.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

1.
BUDZYŃSKA, Anna and URBANEK, Mirosław. Forecasting the directions of the EU sugar market development after limiting government intervention. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 30 June 2022. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 297-315. [Accessed 7 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2022.016.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Budzyńska, Mirosław Urbanek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1224
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop