Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Company Competitiveness Profiles on the example of Polish enterprises in the Silesian Region in 2020
  • Home
  • /
  • Company Competitiveness Profiles on the example of Polish enterprises in the Silesian Region in 2020
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022) /
  4. Articles

Company Competitiveness Profiles on the example of Polish enterprises in the Silesian Region in 2020

Authors

  • Olaf Flak Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8815-1185
  • Grzegorz Głód University of Economics in Katowice https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9699-2427

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.006

Keywords

company competitiveness, company competitiveness profile, competitive potential, strategy of competition, competitive advantage

Abstract

Motivation: The concept of competitiveness is used to define the ratio of enterprises to competitors and results from many internal features and the ability to deal with an external environment. However, comparing main elements of company competitiveness to each other does not give detailed position in the market sector, which is the main area of competition. Therefore it is necessary to look for a different method of companies comparison in the field of their competitiveness.

Aim: The purpose of this paper is to present a assessment method of company competitiveness based on the Company Competitiveness Profile in a market sector. The Company Competitive Profile consists of different variables of a competitive potential, a strategy of competition and a competitive advantage. This method is verified based on results of the Company Competitiveness Barometer conducted in 2021 in 177 Polish companies in the Silesian Region. The Company Competitiveness Barometer is an online research tool for assessing company competitiveness which has been used by the authors since 2012.

Results: The questionnaire used in the Company Competitiveness Barometer contains 48 questions. 45 of them are related to the characteristics of the company that are affecting its competitiveness, and 3 questions are metric questions. The questionnaire can be found on http://sensorium24.com. There were 2 hypotheses which were verified in the paper: H1: The configuration of the components of the Company Competitiveness Profile is different in different sectors of the economy. H2: Each company can be characterized in a sector by its individual Company Competitive Profile. The papers presents verification of two hypothesis which concern the Company Competitive Profiles and their use in assessment of company competitiveness in an economic sector. This is also an added value and an original contribution to company research methodology.

References

Anderson, M.E., Jacobsen, L.R., & Reid, G. (2002). Profiles in small business: a competitive strategy approach. Routledge.

Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I.E., Rohm, H., Normann, A., Bossle, M.B., Grønhøj, A., & Oostindjer, M. (2017). Key characteristics and success factors of supply chain initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste: a multiple case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.173.

Bhattacharjee, D., & Dey, M. (2015). Competitive profile matrix: a theoretical review. ABAC Journal, 35(2), 61–70.

Capps III, C.J., & Glissmeyer, M.D. (2012). Extending the competitive profile matrix using internal factor evaluation and external factor evaluation matrix concepts. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(5), 1059–1062. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v28i5.7245.

Carayannis, E.G., & Popescu, D. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries. Technovation, 25(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00071-3.

Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107.

Chrobocińska, K. (2020). Evaluation of enterprise’s competitive position: case study. Scientific Works of the University of Economics in Wrocław, 64(4), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2020.4.02.

Fahy, J., & Hooley, G. (2002). Sustainable competitive advantage in electronic business: towards a contingency perspective on the resource-based view. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 10(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254022000014532.

Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2012). Konkurencyjni przetrwają. Difin.

Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2015a). Results of the company competitiveness barometr 2014 in Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici: Zarządzanie, 42(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_ZARZ.2015.023.

Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2015b). Verification of the relationships between the elements of an integrated model of competitiveness of the company. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 608–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.132.

Giuliano, R., Kampelmann, S., Mahy, B., & Rycx, F. (2017). Short notice, big difference: the effect of temporary employment on firm competitiveness across sectors. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(2), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12236.

Głód, G., & Flak, O. (2017). Factors of Competitiveness in Polish Companies in the Silesian Region in 2014–2016. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.37.

Goess, S., de Jong, M., & Meijers, E. (2016). City branding in polycentric urban regions: Identification, profiling and transformation in the Randstad and Rhine–Ruhr. European Planning Studies, 24(11), 2036–2056. Https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1228832.

Gołębiowski, T. (2001). Strategic management: planning and control. Difin.

Gorynia, M. (2004). Competitiveness of Polish firms and the European Union enlargement. Competitiveness Review, 14(1/2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb046463.

Horvat, D., Stahlecker, T., Zenker, A., Lerch, C., & Mladineo, M. (2018). A conceptual approach to analysing manufacturing companies’ profiles concerning Industry 4.0 in emerging economies. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.065.

Jenssen, J.I. (2003). Innovation, capabilities and competitive advantage in Norwegian shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(2), 93–106. Https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000084841.

Lis, A. (2020). Managing organization development: identifying research patterns and mapping the research field. In A. Zakrzewska-Bielawska, & I. Staniec (Eds.), Contemporary challenges in cooperation and coopetition in the age of industry 4.0 (pp. 375–396). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30549-9_20.

Liu, C.H. (2017). Creating competitive advantage: linking perspectives of organization learning, innovation behavior and intellectual capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.013.

Lombana, J. (2011). Looking for a distinctive model with which to analyze competitiveness. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 19 (3–4), 32–44.

Mahdi, O.R., Nassar, I.A., & Almsafir, M.K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320–334. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013.

Medilo, Jr,C., & Aniga, F. (2018). What can municipalities do to enhance competitive advantage. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development, 6, 288–297.

Piątkowski, M. (2012). Factors strengthening the competitive position of SME sector enterprises: an example for Poland. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1001.

Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). Rewiew: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4) 747–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148708.

Ritchie, J. R., & Crouch, G. I. (2010). A model of destination competitiveness/sustainability: Brazilian perspectives. Revista de Administracao Publica, 44(5), 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122010000500003.

Romanowska, M. (2009). Planowanie strategiczne w przedsiębiorstwie. PWE.

Romanowska, M. (2012). Odporność przedsiębiorstwa na kryzys. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów/Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 118, 7–15.

Rousseau, R. (2019). Balassa = revealed competitive advantage = activity. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1835–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03273-y.

Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., & Gilbert, B.A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695.

Sohel, S.M., Rahman, A.M.A., & Uddin, M.A. (2014). Competitive profile matrix (CPM) as a competitors’ analysis tool: a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Human Potential Development, 3(3), 40–47.

Schimmer, M. (2012). Competitive dynamics in the global insurance industry: strategic groups, competitive moves, and firm performance. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3992-0.

Stankiewicz, M.J. (2002). Konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstwa: budowanie konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa w warunkach globalizacji. Dom Organizatora.

Stanley, L., Kellermanns, F.W., & Zellweger, T.M. (2017). Latent profile analysis: understanding family firm profiles. Family Business Review, 30(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516677426.

Strumsky, D., & Thill, J.C. (2013). Profiling US metropolitan regions by their social research networks and regional economic performance. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12048.

Tan, Q., & Sousa, C.M. (2015). Leveraging marketing capabilities into competitive advantage and export performance. International Marketing Review, 32(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-12-2013-0279.

Trąpczyński, P., & Gorynia, M. (2017). A double-edged sword: the moderating effects of control on firm capabilities and institutional distance in explaining foreign affiliate performance. International Business Review, 26(4), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.009.

Urbanowska-Sojkin, E., Banaszyk, P., & Witczak, H. (2004). Zarządzanie strategiczne przedsiębiorstwem. PWE.

Urbanowska-Sojkin, E. (2017). Wybory strategiczne: u podstaw „bezwładności” przedsiębiorstw w warunkach niepewności. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 2(176), 53–64.

Wagner, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2003). How does sustainability performance relate to business competitiveness. Greener Management International, 44, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3062.2003.wi.00003.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

1.
FLAK, Olaf and GŁÓD, Grzegorz. Company Competitiveness Profiles on the example of Polish enterprises in the Silesian Region in 2020. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 31 March 2022. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 103-120. [Accessed 30 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2022.006.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Olaf Flak, Grzegorz Głód

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1551
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop