On the academic freedom in the times of crisis of liberal democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.043Keywords
academic freedom, democracy, political economy, neoliberalismAbstract
Motivation: The crisis of liberal democracy reveals a new dimension to the dispute over the role of the university. Declining trust in elites and the growing uncertainty during the pandemic challenge the belief that the key aim of the university reform should be to subject it to the global mechanism of competition as well as to introduce modern management principles. In the American society, there is a growing belief that the higher education system in the United States is heading in the wrong direction and that universities are politically biased. Despite this, the American system inspires higher education all over the world, including Poland. Even during the pandemic, the attention of the academic community in Poland is focused on the lists of journals constituting the basis for the evaluation of universities and academics.
Aim: The aim of the article is to demonstrate the threats posed by a higher education system governed by the dominant economic and political forces. The author evaluates the economic forces behind the parameterisation and ranking system, challenging the rationality of the Polish higher education reforms. The source of the arguments for academic freedom is the political economy that places economic goals in the perspective of long-term universal goals and examines the complex relationships between the economic, political and moral aspects.
Results: Academic freedom is not a privilege of the academic world, but one of the foundations of the successful development of a democratic society because science and education cannot be subject to existing patterns of thinking and current economic and political forces. But modern universities are driven to act like firms in competitive market places and they are following trends set by short-term economic and politic interests. Political economy is an effective tool for analysing functioning of higher education operating in quasi-market conditions, imposed by the dominant market players and the state. Understanding the forces underlying the reform of universities requires an analysis of the processes of interpenetration of economic and political processes, which means that the paradigm of political economy is gaining importance. In view of the requirements imposed on universities, dictated by short-term interests, the most important thing is the awareness that the necessity of state financing means that no solution will guarantee autonomy, if there is no responsibility of the academic community and self-discipline of its members.
References
Anielska, A. (2017). Edukacja dorosłych w ofercie szkół wyższych: strategie uczelni w świetle teorii zależności od zasobów. Edukacja, 142(3), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.24131/3724.170307.
Bloom, A. (2012). The closing of the American mind. Simon and Schuster.
Bowen, W.M., Schwartz, M., & Camp, L. (2014). The end of academic freedom: the coming obliteration the core of purpose of the university. Information Age Publishing.
Derrida, J. (2002). Without alibi. Stanford University Press.
Graeber, D. (2016). The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity and secret joys of bureaucracy. Melville.
Greenfeld, L. (2016). Back to 1984: the role of american universities in dismantling liberal democracy. Society, 53(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0030-8.
Hartl, P. (2012). Michael Polanyi on freedom of science. Synthesis Philosophica, 27(2), 307–321.
Hayek, F. (2020). The constitution of liberty: the definitive edition. In R. Hamowy (Ed.), The collected works of F.A. Hayek, 17. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138400047.
Heller, M. (2016). Moralność myślenia. Copernicus Center Press.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. Media Rodzina.
Kehm, B. (2011). Być albo nie być: wpływ inicjatywy doskonałości na niemiecki system szkolnictwa wyższego. In C. Kościelniak, & J. Makowski (Eds.), Wolność, równość, uniwersytet (pp. 229–255). Instytut Obywatelski.
Konecki, K. (2020). Uwagi na temat tego, co jest postrzegane jako ważne i nieważne w socjologii. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 16(2), 188–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.16.2.11.
Kwiek, M. (2012). Changing higher education policies: from the deinstitutionalization to reinstitutionalization of the research mission in Polish universities. Sciences and Public Policy, 39(5), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs042.
Lorenz, C.(2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance: universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599–629. https://doi.org/10.1086/664553.
Mączyńska, E., & Pysz P. (2014). Liberalizm, neoliberalizm i ordoliberalizm. Ekonomista, 2, 221–247.
McCants, A. (2016). Measuring prosperity and preserving freedom: an economic education with Michael Polanyi. Tradition & Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 42(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc201642320.
Miller, B. (2014). Free to manager: a neo-liberal demence of academic freedom in British higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.861055.
Morawski, R.Z.(2019). Ewolucja modelu kariery naukowej i dylematy etyczne środowiska naukowego, In J. Woźnicki (Ed), Transformacja akademickiego szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce w okresie trzydziestolecia 1989–2019 (pp. 165–192). KRASP.
Parker, K. (2019). The growing partisan divide in views of higher education. Retrieved 18.08.2021 from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/08/19/the-growing-partisan-divide-in-views-of-higher-education-2.
Pink, D.H. (2012). Drive: kompletnie nowe spojrzenie na motywację. Studio Emka.
Pirie, I. (2009). The political economy of academic publishing. Historical Materialism, 17(3), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/146544609X12469428108466.
Polanyi, M. (1953). Protests and problem. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9(9), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1953.11457469.
Readings, B. (2017). Uniwersytet w ruinie. Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
Shils, E. (1954). The scientific community: thoughts after Hamburg. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 10(5), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1954.11453458.
Sławek, T. (2011). Autonomia, kształcenie, dług. In C. Kościelniak, & J. Makowski (Eds.), Wolność, równość, uniwersytet (pp. 21–32). Instytut Obywatelski.
Stachowicz, J. (2015). Patologie organizacyjne w szkolnictwie wyższym w Polsce w latach 1990–2007. Adam Marszałek.
Szadkowski, K. (2015). Uniwersytet jako dobro wspólne: podstawy krytycznych badań nad szkolnictwem wyższym. PWN.
Urbanek, P. (2019). Teorie ładu akademickiego. Gospodarka Narodowa, 300(4), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/113062.
Urbanek, P. (2020). Ład akademicki w uniwersytecie korporacyjnym: teorie, instytucje, efektywność. Uniwersytet Łódzki.
van Noorden, R. (2013). Open access: the true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495, 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/495426a.
Wallace, M., & Pocklington, K. (2002). Managing complex educational change: large-scale reorganization of schools. Routledge.
White, S., & Creaser, C. (2007). Trends in scholarly journal prices 2000–2006. Retrieved 18.08.2021 from https://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/infosci/lisu/downloads/op37.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Janina Godłów-Legiędź
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 707
Number of citations: 0