Systemic transformation in Poland and Eastern Germany: two versions of the Social Market Economy?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.015Keywords
systemic transformation, shock therapy, economic system, Social Market Economy, institutional frameworkAbstract
Motivation: The process of systemic transformation in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, including Poland and Eastern Germany, which began in the early 1990s, can be described as a unique event in the entire economic history of the world. Therefore, in a situation where it was necessary to decide on the model and pace of stabilization, it was difficult to refer to the experience of other countries. The 30 years that have passed since the beginning of the systemic transformation in Poland and East Germany have been a convenient time to assess the course of the transformation process, the changes that have taken place in these economies, and describe the economic models that have shaped them. The reason for this lies in the importance of this subject and the consequences which the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, including Poland and East Germany, continue to face. Parts of this paper were written as part of Statutory Research at the College of World Economy of the Warsaw School of Economics in 2020, 30 years after the system transformation: lessons and current challenges for the economy in Germany and Poland.
Aim: The article aims to compare the course and consequences of the systemic transformation in Poland and East Germany, highlight subconsciousness and differences, and determine to what extent the shape of the economic system meets the assumptions of the Social Market Economy.
Results: The primary added value of the article is a comparative analysis of the Polish and East German systemic transformation from the perspective of 30 years from its beginning, its successes and failures and a reference to the assumptions of the social market economy, as well as an attempt to answer the question about the contemporary characteristics of both economies.
References
Arbeitskreis “VGR der Länder” (2020). Retrieved 13.07.2021 from https://www.statistikportal.de/de/vgrdl/publikationen.
Bąk, M. (2006). Europa Środkowa i Wschodnia wobec wyzwania transformacyjnego. Uniwersytet Gdański.
Berger, S. (1996). Introduction. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism (pp. 1–29). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501722158-002.
Bofinger, P. (1990). The German monetary unification (GMU): converting marks to D-Marks. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 72(4), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.72.17-36.
Brenke, K., Eickelpasch, A., Postlep, R.-D., Gerling, K., Sander, B., Schmidt, K.-D., Beer, S., Bergemann, A., Komar, W., Müller, R., Ragnitz, J., Traben, L. (1999). Gesamtwirtschaftliche und unternehmerische Anpassungs-fortschritte in Ostdeutschland: Neunzehnter Bericht. Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge, 346/347, 1-193.
Dąbrowski, M. (1997). Fiscal policy in Poland under transition. Russian and East European Finance and Trade, 6(33), 5–66.
Eucken, W. (1992). The foundations of economics: history and theory in the analysis of economic reality. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77318-1.
Eucken, W. (2004). Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Mohr Siebeck.
Goebel, J., Habich, R., Krause, P. (2009). Zur Angleichung von Einkommen und Lebensqualität im vereinigten Deutschland. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 78(2), 122–145.
Graca-Gelert, P. (2021). Zróżnicowanie dochodów, zagrożenie ubóstwem oraz inne wybrane aspekty wykluczenia społecznego w Polsce na tle krajów Unii Europejskiej. In A.M. Kowalski, & M.A. Weresa (Eds.), Polska: raport o konkurencyjności 2021: bilateralna współpraca gospodarcza a przewagi konkurencyjne (pp. 49–80). SGH.
GUS. (2020). Polska w liczbach 2020. Retrieved 11.07.2021 from https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5501/14/13/1/polska_w_liczbach_2020_pl.pdf.
GUS. (2021). Przeciętne miesięczne wynagrodzenie w gospodarce narodowej w latach 1950–2020. Retrieved 13.07.2021 from https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-zatrudnieni-wynagrodzenia-koszty-pracy/przecietne-miesieczne-wynagrodzenie-w-gospodarce-narodowej-w-latach-1950-2020,2,1.html.
Jansen, H. (2004). Transfers to Germany’s eastern Länder: a necessary price for convergence or a permanent drag. ECFIN Country Focus, 1(16), 1–6.
Kaczmarek, T.T., & Pysz, P. (2004). Ludwig Erhard i społeczna gospodarka rynkowa. PAN.
Kamińska, K. (2018). Ordoliberalizm i keynesizm: dwie sprzeczne koncepcje w polityce gospodarczej powojennych Niemiec. UOKiK.
Karsten, S. (1985). Eucken’s ‚social market economy’ and its test in post-war west Germany: the economist as social philosopher developed ideas that parallelled progressive thought in America. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 44(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1985.tb02331.x.
Kleer, J. (1999). Niemcy Wschodnie a teoria transformacji. In W. Małachowski (Ed.), Polska–Niemcy a gospodarka rynkowa (pp. 18–35). SGH.
Klump, R. (2001). Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Geistige Grundlagen, ethischer Anspruch, historische Wurzeln. In O. Schlecht, & G. Stoltenberg (Ed.), Soziale Marktwirtschaft. Grundlagen, Entwicklungslinien, Perspektiven (pp. 17–59). Verlag Herder.
Kołodko, G. (2000). From shock to therapy: the political economy of postsocialist transformation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297437.001.0001.
Kołodko, G. (2020). Economics and politics of post-communist transition to market and democracy: the lessons from Polish experience. Post-Communist Economies, 32(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1694604.
Kouba, L. (2016). A lesson for the contemporary European, periphery from the transition process of the CEE countries. In P. Huber, D. Nerudová, & P. Rozmahel (Eds.), Competitiveness, social inclusion and sustainability in a diverse European Union: perspectives from old and new member states (pp. 163–178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17299-6_9.
Krause, P., & Habich, R. (2000). Einkommen und Lebensqualität im vereinigten Deutschland. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 69(2), 316–340.
Krąpiec, M. (2002). Powszechna encyklopedia filozofii. Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu.
Ludwig, U. (2020). Mikrofundierte makroökonomische Resultate der ostdeutschen Transformationswirtschaft. In Ostdeutschland. Eine Bilanz (pp. 16–35). Leibnitz Institute für Wirtschaftsforschung.
Maier, C.S. (2012). The travails of unification: east Germany’s economic transition since 1989. In G. Roland (Ed.), Economies in transition: studies in development economics and policy (pp. 344–363). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230361836_14.
Müller, M.H-P. (2019). Neo-Ordoliberalismus: Ein Zukunftsmodell für die Soziale Marktwirtschaft Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21883-6.
Müller-Armack, A. (1978). The social market economy as an economic and social order. Review of Social Economy, 36(3), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767800000020.
Przybyciński, T. (2010). Etyka a kształtowanie rynkowego ładu gospodarczego w Polsce. Annales: Etyka w życiu gospodarczym, 13(1), 167–175.
Rapacki, R., & Próchniak, M. (2021). Rozwój gospodarki polskiej w latach 2010–2020 na tle innych krajów UE i wybranych partnerów gospodarczych Polski. In A.M. Kowalski, & M.A, Weresa (Eds.), Polska: raport o konkurencyjności 2021: bilateralna współpraca gospodarcza a przewagi konkurencyjne (pp. 29–48). SGH.
Rosati, D. (1994). Output decline during transition from plan to market. Economies of Transition, 2(4), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.1994.tb00126.x.
Sachs, J. (1993). Poland’s jump to the market economy. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5430.001.0001.
Stack, H.M. (1997). The “colonization” of east Germany: a comparative analysis of German privatization. Duke Law Journal, 46(5), 1211–1253. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372919.
Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: how much has happened (pp. 5–38). Institute for International Economies.
Williamson, J. (2004). The Washington consensus as policy prescription for development. Retrieved 29.03.2021 from: https://www.piie.com/publications/papers/williamson0204.pdf.
Williamson, J. (2005). Differing interpretations of the Washington consensus. Leon Kozminski Academy of Entrepreneurship and Management and TIGER Distinguished Lectures Series, 17, 1–23.
World Bank. (2017). Lessons from Poland, insights for Poland: a sustainable and inclusive transition to high income status. Retrieved 13.07.2021 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28960.
World Bank. (2021). Retrieved 22.11.2020 from https://data.worldbank.org.
Zagóra-Jonszta, U. (1999). Ordoliberalizm a społeczna gospodarka rynkowa Niemiec: możliwości jej realizacji w Polsce. Akademia Ekonomiczna w Katowicach.
Żuchowska, D. (2012). Polityka kursu walutowego a inflacja w krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. CeDeWu.
Żukrowska, K., (2000). Poland: an effective strategy of systemic change. In W. Kostecki, K. Żukrowska, & B. Góralczyk (Eds.), Transformations of post-communist states (pp. 168–184). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511309_10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Katarzyna Kamińska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 388
Number of citations: 0
